The post Women Spent 50% More Than Men On Mental Health Medications In 2024 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A GoodRx analysis estimated that in 2024, women spent around 50% more out of pocket than men did on mental health prescriptions. (Photo: Getty) getty It will be important to mind the gap here—the gap between how much women and men may be spending on mental health prescription medications. A GoodRx analysis estimated that in 2024, women spent around 50% more out of pocket than men did on mental health prescriptions. That’s $5.4 billion for women compared to $3.6 billion for a $1.8 billion difference. Now, there are four possible things that could be driving this difference. And, spoiler alert, none of these Rx-related possible things would be good. GoodRx Based The Analysis On A Sample Of Prescription Fills In 2024 The analysis was based on a sample of over 250 million prescription fills for mental health medications in 2024. As Tori Marsh, MPH, the senior director of research at Good Rx who led this analysis, explained, “These fills come from a national claims dataset licensed by GoodRx, which captures anonymized retail prescription transactions across payers, pharmacies, and geographies.” Marsh then described how they went from the findings from this sample to the national estimates: “We extrapolated the results using IQVIA’s 2024 Report on the Use of Medicines in the U.S. and IQVIA Longitudinal Access and Adjudication Data.” Note that this was not a peer-reviewed study published in a scientific journal and did have a number of different limitations, some of which will be discussed later. Therefore, take everything you can get from it with a grain—or maybe multiple grains—of salt. Nevertheless, the findings do raise important questions and call for further studies to figure out, “What’s going on,” in the words of that Marvin Gaye song. Women Filled More And Spent More On Prescriptions For Different Mental Health Conditions… The post Women Spent 50% More Than Men On Mental Health Medications In 2024 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A GoodRx analysis estimated that in 2024, women spent around 50% more out of pocket than men did on mental health prescriptions. (Photo: Getty) getty It will be important to mind the gap here—the gap between how much women and men may be spending on mental health prescription medications. A GoodRx analysis estimated that in 2024, women spent around 50% more out of pocket than men did on mental health prescriptions. That’s $5.4 billion for women compared to $3.6 billion for a $1.8 billion difference. Now, there are four possible things that could be driving this difference. And, spoiler alert, none of these Rx-related possible things would be good. GoodRx Based The Analysis On A Sample Of Prescription Fills In 2024 The analysis was based on a sample of over 250 million prescription fills for mental health medications in 2024. As Tori Marsh, MPH, the senior director of research at Good Rx who led this analysis, explained, “These fills come from a national claims dataset licensed by GoodRx, which captures anonymized retail prescription transactions across payers, pharmacies, and geographies.” Marsh then described how they went from the findings from this sample to the national estimates: “We extrapolated the results using IQVIA’s 2024 Report on the Use of Medicines in the U.S. and IQVIA Longitudinal Access and Adjudication Data.” Note that this was not a peer-reviewed study published in a scientific journal and did have a number of different limitations, some of which will be discussed later. Therefore, take everything you can get from it with a grain—or maybe multiple grains—of salt. Nevertheless, the findings do raise important questions and call for further studies to figure out, “What’s going on,” in the words of that Marvin Gaye song. Women Filled More And Spent More On Prescriptions For Different Mental Health Conditions…

Women Spent 50% More Than Men On Mental Health Medications In 2024

A GoodRx analysis estimated that in 2024, women spent around 50% more out of pocket than men did on mental health prescriptions. (Photo: Getty)

getty

It will be important to mind the gap here—the gap between how much women and men may be spending on mental health prescription medications. A GoodRx analysis estimated that in 2024, women spent around 50% more out of pocket than men did on mental health prescriptions. That’s $5.4 billion for women compared to $3.6 billion for a $1.8 billion difference. Now, there are four possible things that could be driving this difference. And, spoiler alert, none of these Rx-related possible things would be good.

GoodRx Based The Analysis On A Sample Of Prescription Fills In 2024

The analysis was based on a sample of over 250 million prescription fills for mental health medications in 2024. As Tori Marsh, MPH, the senior director of research at Good Rx who led this analysis, explained, “These fills come from a national claims dataset licensed by GoodRx, which captures anonymized retail prescription transactions across payers, pharmacies, and geographies.” Marsh then described how they went from the findings from this sample to the national estimates: “We extrapolated the results using IQVIA’s 2024 Report on the Use of Medicines in the U.S. and IQVIA Longitudinal Access and Adjudication Data.”

Note that this was not a peer-reviewed study published in a scientific journal and did have a number of different limitations, some of which will be discussed later. Therefore, take everything you can get from it with a grain—or maybe multiple grains—of salt. Nevertheless, the findings do raise important questions and call for further studies to figure out, “What’s going on,” in the words of that Marvin Gaye song.

Women Filled More And Spent More On Prescriptions For Different Mental Health Conditions

Marsh and the GoodRx team found that women not only spent more on mental health medications but also filled more prescriptions of such meds. The following graph shows how much more for different mental health conditions:

The somewhat darker and thinner blue bar represents how much more prescriptions women filled compared to men percentage-wise for each mental health condition. The somewhat lighter and thicker blue bar represents how much more women spent than men percentage-wise for each. As you can see the spend for women for depression was 113% higher than men, followed by anxiety at 102% more, panic disorder at 53% more, bipolar disorder at 46% more, and obsessive-compulsive disorder at 26% more.

The Mental Health Prescription Gap Between Women And Men Increased With Age

The GoodRx analysis also revealed that these mental health prescription spending and fill gaps between the sexes increased with age. Just look at what happens to both the thinner and darker blue lines and the ticker and lighter blue lines in the following figure as you go from the below 18 years age group all the way up to the over 64 years age group:

The Limitations Of This Analysis

Now, Marsh did say that they couldn’t determine from the analysis alone whether women were paying more than men for each prescription fill or for the same medications. It’s not clear whether the greater spend was due simply to women filling more mental prescriptions.

Furthermore, this analysis was for only one year rather than multiple years. It could not show trends over multiple years. So, there remains the possibility that 2024 was an outlier, an unusual year.

Additionally, prescription fills are not the same as usage. In theory, people could be getting the medications from pharmacies or mail-order outlets and then leaving them in their medicine cabinets, night stands, hedgehog-shaped pill boxes or wherever unused.

Moreover, a sample is a sample and isn’t exactly the same as the entire population, no matter how representative of the whole population the sample may be. Plus, the analysis didn’t take some deeper dives that will be mentioned later.

Why Might Women Be Spending More On Mental Health Medications

Nevertheless, what Marsh and her team found was not an itty-bitty discrepancy between men and women. It was more like a city-biggy difference, which suggests that something real is happening here. The question here is what. Well, here are four possibilities:

  • Possibility One—More women are suffering more mental health challenges than men: Studies have suggested that women are more likely than men to be diagnosed with certain mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety disorders. There are also periods of time where women may be more likely to experience depression symptoms such as during and after pregnancy, around the time of their menstrual period during perimenopause.
  • Possibility Two—Women are more likely than men to seek care for mental health challenges: Of course, just because women may be more likely to be diagnosed with a mental health condition doesn’t necessarily mean they are suffering such conditions more frequently. Studies have also suggested that men are less likely to seek help and treatment if they do have a mental health condition.
  • Possibility Three—Doctors are prescribing medications to women at a greater rate than to men for the same mental health challenges: Of course, just because you are struggling with a mental health challenge doesn’t necessarily mean that you should be taking a prescription medication. There are other approaches such as counseling and therapy. One concern is that some doctors may be too quick to jump to prescribe medications to certain people rather than try other possible treatment approaches first.
  • Possibility Four—Women have worse insurance coverage than men: Could the higher out of pocket payments for women be due to their having worse insurance coverage than men do? Data have shown that women are more likely to be uninsured and when they do have insurance, what’s covered tends to be less. This possibility alone may not explain the higher fill rate of prescription medications, though.

More Studies Are Needed

Any number of the aforementioned four possibilities could be at play either separately or in some combinations with each other. It will be important to figure out what’s going on because each of these possibilities is not good.

On the one hand, if women are indeed more likely to experience mental health challenges, the big question is how can this gap be closed? Since men and women kind of are connected with each other and aren’t on separate planets, anything that affects women will end up affecting men and vice-versa. This also applies to the possibility of men quietly struggling with mental health challenges without seeking help or treatment. This could impact their partners, families, co-workers, employees (if the men are business leaders) or entire populations (if the men are political leaders, for example).

On the other hand, if this is an issue of either the overprescription of medications to women or women having worse insurance coverage, then surprise, surprise, the broader healthcare system in the U.S. needs fixing. You may not think about healthcare system problems if you aren’t currently using the healthcare system regularly. But what happens when it is your turn to get care. Will your treatment be actually driven by scientific evidence? Will you be able to pay for your care?

While it does have its limitations, this GoodRx analysis serves as a good opener to more consideration and more studies—not just about mental health medication use but also about broader issues. In other words, the gap that this analysis found shouldn’t just be something that we as an interconnected society should mind, it should be something that we should fully address.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2025/10/08/women-spent-50-more-than-men-on-mental-health-medications-in-2024/

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.001973
$0.001973$0.001973
-1.05%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Iran’s Central Bank Spends $500M on Crypto Amid Rial Crisis

Iran’s Central Bank Spends $500M on Crypto Amid Rial Crisis

Iran's Central Bank has reportedly acquired more than $500 million in cryptocurrency assets over the past year to mitigate the ongoing currency crisis.
Share
coinlineup2026/01/22 08:59
Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35