The post Key Satoshi Feature Uncovered as Bitcoin Community Remains on Edge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As reported, the Bitcoin Core project announced that new core release v30.0 is available for testing. The Bitcoin Core v30 update, however, did not sit well with some members of the Bitcoin community, including Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo, who recommended not upgrading to the Bitcoin Core release. “As a (hopefully) temporary measure, run Knots. I strongly recommend not upgrading to Core v30,” Szabo wrote.  A few other Bitcoin community members also disagreed with the recent Core release. The bone of contention in the Bitcoin v 30.0 release is an increase in OP_RETURN beyond the limit of 80 bytes. As seen in the testing guide of the Bitcoin v30.0 release candidate, the upgrade increases “datacarriersize” to 100,000 by default, and to test this, one of the steps is for users to generate a new transaction with an OP_RETURN of greater than 83. Adam Back weighs in Bitcoin pioneer and Blockstream CEO Adam Back weighs in as the recent Bitcoin upgrade splits the community. Back made an important clarification about “OP_RETURN,” which is the main bone of contention. Op return is old 15 years. It’s a Satoshi feature — Adam Back (@adam3us) October 9, 2025 To clarify, OP_Return is a special data storage function in a blockchain transaction. While it is commonly believed that Bitcoin Core client version 0.9.0 introduced the OP_Return function to allow users to attach additional information to Bitcoin transactions, Back stated that “OP_RETURN” was a Satoshi feature, dating back to 15 years ago. “Op return is old 15 years. It’s a Satoshi feature,” Back stated in a tweet.  While the Bitcoin Core v30 update includes TRUC transaction support, among others, the fact that it removes a limit on transaction data, increasing it to 100,000 bytes, as well as the OP_Return limit of 80 bytes, might not sit well… The post Key Satoshi Feature Uncovered as Bitcoin Community Remains on Edge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As reported, the Bitcoin Core project announced that new core release v30.0 is available for testing. The Bitcoin Core v30 update, however, did not sit well with some members of the Bitcoin community, including Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo, who recommended not upgrading to the Bitcoin Core release. “As a (hopefully) temporary measure, run Knots. I strongly recommend not upgrading to Core v30,” Szabo wrote.  A few other Bitcoin community members also disagreed with the recent Core release. The bone of contention in the Bitcoin v 30.0 release is an increase in OP_RETURN beyond the limit of 80 bytes. As seen in the testing guide of the Bitcoin v30.0 release candidate, the upgrade increases “datacarriersize” to 100,000 by default, and to test this, one of the steps is for users to generate a new transaction with an OP_RETURN of greater than 83. Adam Back weighs in Bitcoin pioneer and Blockstream CEO Adam Back weighs in as the recent Bitcoin upgrade splits the community. Back made an important clarification about “OP_RETURN,” which is the main bone of contention. Op return is old 15 years. It’s a Satoshi feature — Adam Back (@adam3us) October 9, 2025 To clarify, OP_Return is a special data storage function in a blockchain transaction. While it is commonly believed that Bitcoin Core client version 0.9.0 introduced the OP_Return function to allow users to attach additional information to Bitcoin transactions, Back stated that “OP_RETURN” was a Satoshi feature, dating back to 15 years ago. “Op return is old 15 years. It’s a Satoshi feature,” Back stated in a tweet.  While the Bitcoin Core v30 update includes TRUC transaction support, among others, the fact that it removes a limit on transaction data, increasing it to 100,000 bytes, as well as the OP_Return limit of 80 bytes, might not sit well…

Key Satoshi Feature Uncovered as Bitcoin Community Remains on Edge

As reported, the Bitcoin Core project announced that new core release v30.0 is available for testing.

The Bitcoin Core v30 update, however, did not sit well with some members of the Bitcoin community, including Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo, who recommended not upgrading to the Bitcoin Core release.

“As a (hopefully) temporary measure, run Knots. I strongly recommend not upgrading to Core v30,” Szabo wrote.  A few other Bitcoin community members also disagreed with the recent Core release.

The bone of contention in the Bitcoin v 30.0 release is an increase in OP_RETURN beyond the limit of 80 bytes.

As seen in the testing guide of the Bitcoin v30.0 release candidate, the upgrade increases “datacarriersize” to 100,000 by default, and to test this, one of the steps is for users to generate a new transaction with an OP_RETURN of greater than 83.

Adam Back weighs in

Bitcoin pioneer and Blockstream CEO Adam Back weighs in as the recent Bitcoin upgrade splits the community. Back made an important clarification about “OP_RETURN,” which is the main bone of contention.

To clarify, OP_Return is a special data storage function in a blockchain transaction.

While it is commonly believed that Bitcoin Core client version 0.9.0 introduced the OP_Return function to allow users to attach additional information to Bitcoin transactions, Back stated that “OP_RETURN” was a Satoshi feature, dating back to 15 years ago.

“Op return is old 15 years. It’s a Satoshi feature,” Back stated in a tweet. 

While the Bitcoin Core v30 update includes TRUC transaction support, among others, the fact that it removes a limit on transaction data, increasing it to 100,000 bytes, as well as the OP_Return limit of 80 bytes, might not sit well with some members of the community.

Source: https://u.today/key-satoshi-feature-uncovered-as-bitcoin-community-remains-on-edge

Market Opportunity
Edge Logo
Edge Price(EDGE)
$0.12945
$0.12945$0.12945
-1.49%
USD
Edge (EDGE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

LONDON, Jan. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Cappfinity is pleased to announce the promotion of Stephanie Hopper to the role of Chief Talent Management Officer, marking
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 15:30
TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

The post TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX is consolidating at the $0.31 level while showing a short-term bullish tendency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 15:27