Garrett Jin was identified as one of the most aggressively short whales, seen as a source of crypto market manipulation.Garrett Jin was identified as one of the most aggressively short whales, seen as a source of crypto market manipulation.

Crypto projects have no steady cash flow, says Garrett Jin

2025/10/14 18:47
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Garrett Jin turned into one of the critical voices in crypto space, just days after only appearing as an anonymous whale. Jin, known for his aggressive BTC short positions, now talks about the sector’s need for security reserves. 

Garrett Jin was finally identified as the bearish OG whale, who appeared just days before the recent market crash. As Cryptopolitan reported, the whale’s wallets became notorious for opening short positions 30 minutes ahead of the late Friday market crash. 

On-chain investigation linked the identity of Jin to some of the OG whale’s wallets. He admitted to holding the positions, though denying any links to the Trump family or deliberate insider trading. 

OG whale Garrett Jin states crypto suffers from lack of revenue

Jin recently stated the crypto space was suffering from a lack of fresh revenue. He explained that the value taken from the crypto space through fees end up hurting BTC and ETH. 

Even though some protocols try to reinvest into their tokens, the industry as a whole suffers from ongoing extraction through exchange fees. 

Jin further showed crypto companies with no revenues are also not attractive investments. In the past years, crypto projects have attempted to build a fee structure for regular payments, but they still rely on external cash to be able to extract the fees. 

Garrett remains bearish in the short term

Jin explained the drive to take up short positions as a hedging strategy, aimed at protecting the funds of an unnamed client. The short positions are not a deliberate tool to extract funds from Hyperliquid, but a short-term hedge, as the anonymous client holds significant spot reserves, said Jin. 

However, in the past, the OG whale’s activities were not just passive short positions. Instead, the whale also often sold BTC and shifted into ETH. 

In his role as a trader, Jin remains bearish, recently adding to the BTC short position. The position has grown to a notional value of $491M, with a liquidation price of $124,260. As a Hyperliquid whale, Jin now holds the top liquidatable short position, gradually increasing the liquidation price over the past few days. 

Garrett Jin: Crypto projects have no reliable cash flow.The BTC short position of Garrett Jin is the largest on Hyperliquid, after a few days of adding more collateral. Jin has not been deliberately hunted to liquidate the position, as BTC remains depressed at under $115,000. | Source: CoinGlass.

The position carries unrealized profit of over $15M, and is currently not threatened by aggressive counter-trading. There is also no similar level of long liquidity on Hyperliquid, while previously large-scale short positions were deliberately hunted and liquidated. Jin’s position remained safe, as BTC took another downturn on Tuesday, to trade at $111,879, after attempting to recover to $115,000.

Jin also remained critical of the crypto space as a whole, calling for more mature trading tools rather than relying on hype and narratives. He has reached out to other ecosystem influencers, calling for the creation of bailout funds and avoiding the technical risk of liquidations. Jin claimed the crypto space has too many tokens with no intrinsic value and high leverage, creating an inherently risky situation. He added that exchanges should have a stabilization mechanism similar to stocks, otherwise they’re risking similar deleveraging events like Friday’s crash.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken

Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken

The post Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Nasdaq, the world’s second-largest stock exchange by market capitalization
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/10 10:40
Video Marketing Technology: Platform Selection, Distribution and Performance Measurement

Video Marketing Technology: Platform Selection, Distribution and Performance Measurement

Video content drives engagement more effectively than static imagery across virtually all platforms and audience segments. Video marketing effectiveness depends
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 10:23