Larry Fink now calls Bitcoin “digital gold” and acknowledges it as a legitimate asset. Fink advises caution, recommending Bitcoin as a small portfolio component. Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has changed his stance on Bitcoin, calling the cryptocurrency “digital gold” and acknowledging its position as a legitimate alternative asset. This is a stark reversal from [...]]]>Larry Fink now calls Bitcoin “digital gold” and acknowledges it as a legitimate asset. Fink advises caution, recommending Bitcoin as a small portfolio component. Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has changed his stance on Bitcoin, calling the cryptocurrency “digital gold” and acknowledging its position as a legitimate alternative asset. This is a stark reversal from [...]]]>

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink Admits He Was Wrong on Bitcoin — Now Calls It “Digital Gold”

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Larry Fink now calls Bitcoin “digital gold” and acknowledges it as a legitimate asset.
  • Fink advises caution, recommending Bitcoin as a small portfolio component.

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has changed his stance on Bitcoin, calling the cryptocurrency “digital gold” and acknowledging its position as a legitimate alternative asset. This is a stark reversal from his comments in 2017, when he called Bitcoin an “index of money laundering” that “was used mainly by criminals.” While Fink still advises against overexposure to the asset, the shift in his tone is indicative of an increasing acceptance of Bitcoin’s presence in mainstream finance.

Fink’s acknowledgement of Bitcoin as a store of value arrives at a time when cryptocurrencies led by Bitcoin continue to gain more attention in the mainstream. Bitcoin has experienced multiple market crashes over the last few years, but has continued to grow, and investors are turning to it as a safe haven against inflation and political unrest. 

While Fink has expressed acceptance of the value of Bitcoin, he still has not fully warmed to the concept of investing significant parts of investment portfolios in the digital currency. Fink acknowledged that it is a safe-haven asset, but said, “It is not a bad asset.” However, he did say that Bitcoin is not meant to be a major part of most investors’ portfolios, and that investors should be careful in how much exposure they have.

BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF and Institutional Adoption

BlackRock’s decision to launch a Bitcoin ETF that was approved by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a significant step in the institutionalization of cryptocurrency investments. The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF, launched in 2024, became the world’s largest crypto ETF in a short time, with more than $93.9 billion in assets under management. The ETF enables traditional investors to receive exposure to Bitcoin without having to buy and store the cryptocurrency directly.

Other major financial institutions share BlackRock’s interest in the crypto space. Companies such as Fidelity, Tesla, and Metaplanet have added Bitcoin to portfolios, which has led to the adoption of the cryptocurrency as a way to diversify and hedge against inflation. 

Retail Interest and Bitcoin’s Global Appeal

Bitcoin isn’t only popular with institutional investors. Retail investors have also expressed high demand, with nearly half of the demand for BlackRock’s Bitcoin Fund ETF from individual investors. According to Fink, 75% of the retail investors had never held an iShares product previously, showcasing the changing mindset towards cryptocurrency.

Financial experts such as Fabian Dori, Chief Investment Officer of Sygnum Bank, say that global tensions and the risk of weakening currencies are among the major drivers of Bitcoin’s appeal. With political instability, increasing debt, and high inflation affecting economies around the world, investors are increasingly turning to decentralized assets such as Bitcoin, which is immune to manipulation by government and inflationary pressures.

Despite its support by BlackRock and the growing interest of institutional investors, some traditional investment platforms are still skeptical. Investment companies such as Hargreaves Lansdown still warn investors of Bitcoin’s volatility and lack of inherent value. 

]]>
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken

Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken

The post Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Nasdaq, the world’s second-largest stock exchange by market capitalization
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/10 10:40
Video Marketing Technology: Platform Selection, Distribution and Performance Measurement

Video Marketing Technology: Platform Selection, Distribution and Performance Measurement

Video content drives engagement more effectively than static imagery across virtually all platforms and audience segments. Video marketing effectiveness depends
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 10:23