China hit back Tuesday by sanctioning five U.S.-based subsidiaries of South Korea’s Hanwha Ocean, sending shares of the shipbuilder tumbling over 8% in Seoul. The Chinese government said the action was triggered by Hanwha’s alleged support for U.S. investigations into China’s maritime and shipbuilding sectors. The blacklisted firms are Hanwha Shipping LLC, Hanwha Philly Shipyard […]China hit back Tuesday by sanctioning five U.S.-based subsidiaries of South Korea’s Hanwha Ocean, sending shares of the shipbuilder tumbling over 8% in Seoul. The Chinese government said the action was triggered by Hanwha’s alleged support for U.S. investigations into China’s maritime and shipbuilding sectors. The blacklisted firms are Hanwha Shipping LLC, Hanwha Philly Shipyard […]

China sanctiones five U.S. subsidiaries of Hanwha Ocean for aiding U.S. probes into its shipping sector

2025/10/15 06:15
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

China hit back Tuesday by sanctioning five U.S.-based subsidiaries of South Korea’s Hanwha Ocean, sending shares of the shipbuilder tumbling over 8% in Seoul.

The Chinese government said the action was triggered by Hanwha’s alleged support for U.S. investigations into China’s maritime and shipbuilding sectors.

The blacklisted firms are Hanwha Shipping LLC, Hanwha Philly Shipyard Inc., Hanwha Ocean USA International LLC, Hanwha Shipping Holdings LLC, and HS USA Holdings Corp. These sanctions took effect immediately and block all Chinese businesses and individuals from working with them. China’s Commerce Ministry said the measure was taken to “safeguard sovereignty and national security.”

A spokesperson from China’s Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom) stated, “Hanwha’s subsidiaries in the U.S. have assisted and supported the U.S. government’s probes and measures against Chinese maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors. China is strongly dissatisfied and resolutely opposes it.” The quote was translated and published by CNBC.

Linda Johnson, spokesperson for Hanwha USA, responded in a short statement: “We are aware of the announcement by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, and we are currently reviewing the details. Hanwha will continue to provide world-class maritime services to our customers, including through our investments in the U.S. maritime industry and via Hanwha Philly Shipyard.”

Beijing adds port fees and targets rare earth exports

Hours before announcing the sanctions, China said it had started collecting new port fees on all vessels linked to the United States. The charge stands at 400 yuan—roughly $56 per net ton—and kicked in Tuesday at 12:01 a.m. EDT, exactly when the U.S. began imposing steep port fees on Chinese ships.

China-built vessels will not be subject to these fees, according to Beijing. That gives a loophole to ships made in China, but it hits American shipping firms hard. Container ships vary between 50,000 to 220,000 tons, so this isn’t small money.

At the same time, China has expanded its blacklist of American companies and pushed forward a new rare earth export restriction framework. This comes as a direct reply to U.S. President Donald Trump threatening 100% additional tariffs on Chinese goods. In return, Beijing said its rare earth move was “legitimate.”

There’s also a separate front now. China’s Ministry of Transport opened a full investigation into how the U.S. Section 301 probe is affecting China’s shipping and shipbuilding industries. That probe is the same one the sanctioned Hanwha subsidiaries are accused of aiding.

Beijing said the investigation will focus on whether any companies, individuals, or groups helped the U.S. enforce “discriminatory restrictive behaviours” against the China-linked shipping supply chain.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000943
$0.000943$0.000943
+3.06%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Price Prediction: ARK Projects $300B Liquidity Rebound as Pepeto Targets 267x From Presale

Solana Price Prediction: ARK Projects $300B Liquidity Rebound as Pepeto Targets 267x From Presale

After months of pressure on risk assets, the tide may finally be turning. ARK Invest expects roughly $300 billion to flow back into markets as the Treasury General
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 09:06
Nasdaq-listed crypto treasury GD Culture to add 7,500 BTC after Pallas Capital acquisition closes

Nasdaq-listed crypto treasury GD Culture to add 7,500 BTC after Pallas Capital acquisition closes

Those tokens are worth around $876 million at current prices, making GDC among the top 15 largest publicly traded bitcoin holders.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:19