Chen Zhi, the chairman of Prince Holding Group, set up a Singapore family office that claimed special tax perks while allegedly running one of Asia’s largest crypto crime networks. As Cryptopolitan previously reported, US prosecutors said Chen and several associates, including three Singapore citizens, were hit with sanctions this week for laundering billions of dollars […]Chen Zhi, the chairman of Prince Holding Group, set up a Singapore family office that claimed special tax perks while allegedly running one of Asia’s largest crypto crime networks. As Cryptopolitan previously reported, US prosecutors said Chen and several associates, including three Singapore citizens, were hit with sanctions this week for laundering billions of dollars […]

Accused CEO of Cambodian scam ring linked to Singapore family office

2025/10/16 20:37
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Chen Zhi, the chairman of Prince Holding Group, set up a Singapore family office that claimed special tax perks while allegedly running one of Asia’s largest crypto crime networks.

As Cryptopolitan previously reported, US prosecutors said Chen and several associates, including three Singapore citizens, were hit with sanctions this week for laundering billions of dollars made from online scams built on emotional manipulation and forced labor in Cambodia.

The scam happened via the infamous “pig butchering”, where victims get lured into fake investment platforms, convinced to deposit money, and drained dry once the balance gets fat enough.

The US Department of Justice said Chen’s network used cryptocurrency to clean the proceeds through shell accounts and digital wallets.

As details surfaced, regulators and firms in Singapore began examining how this criminal web operated through legitimate-looking financial channels in one of the world’s strictest business hubs.

MAS investigates DW Capital’s tax incentive claim

Chen and key associate Chen Xiuling were involved in the setting up of single family office DW Capital Holdings Pte in 2018, which claimed to receive a 13X tax incentive from Singapore’s financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Chen Zhi is its founder and chairman, according to the office’s website. Chen Xiuling has been its chief financial officer since 2021, according to a separate exchange filing.

When Bloomberg contacted MAS, a spokesperson allegedly said, “We are looking into whether there have been any breaches of MAS’ requirements in relation to this case.” The statement confirmed that the regulator is now reviewing if DW Capital slipped through gaps in oversight.

The sanctions against Prince Group are part of a broader US crackdown on Cambodia-based criminal institutions.

The Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a “final rule” cutting Huione Group off from the US financial system entirely, citing ongoing struggles in dismantling illegal crypto markets. Singapore police have yet to announce whether they will launch their own investigation into the Prince Group.

Xiuling, who previously served as an independent director at 17LIVE Group Ltd., resigned on Thursday after the US sanctions were announced. The live-streaming platform, backed by Temasek Holdings, was listed on the Singapore Exchange in December 2023 after merging with Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp., a Temasek-supported SPAC.

As of right now, Temasek holds nearly 26% of 17LIVE through its subsidiary, Vertex Ventures. Before her resignation, 17LIVE’s Chief Investment Officer Joji Koda said in an email that Xiuling was appointed during the de-SPAC process after routine background checks.

“17LIVE has never done business with DW Capital, Chen Zhi, or Chen Xiuling,” Koda said, adding that neither Temasek nor Vertex were involved in her appointment and only learned of the allegations after Bloomberg reached out.

Prince-linked real estate deals and luxury condos in Singapore

The criminal investigation extends beyond finance. Prince Group’s construction arm, Canopy Sands Development Co., hired SJ Group, a Temasek subsidiary, for planning and engineering work on Ream City, a $16 billion project in Cambodia’s Sihanoukville. The US Treasury identified Canopy Sands among the entities connected to Chen’s syndicate.

Another Temasek-linked company, CapitaLand Investment was contracted in 2024 to manage two hotels in Cambodia under the Prince umbrella, but later explained that it holds no ownership stake and is “reviewing the latest developments” to ensure compliance with international sanctions, said Bloomberg.

Real estate records show that Chen spent S$17 million ($13 million) on a luxury penthouse in Gramercy Park, near Orchard Road. His associate Li Thet, also Cambodian and named in the US sanctions list, bought another property nearby for S$18.2 million at Boulevard Vue.

Prince Group had previously denied all money-laundering allegations in statements dating back to 2024, saying media reports were false. But those rebuttals have since vanished from the company’s website, no trace remains.

Now, regulators in Singapore are left piecing together how Chen managed to weave a billion-dollar empire of crypto scams, property deals, and tax incentives into a network that touched some of the city’s most reputable institutions without being stopped.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said Thursday it would delay the rollout of new rules governing how banks treat cryptoassets until 2027, pushing back its original target of January 1, 2026 following responses to a consultation on the changes.

“We will continue to monitor developments in the cryptoasset landscape and global regulatory standards to ensure alignment and support responsible innovation,” the regulator said.

Meanwhile, Singapore is considering stripping directorships from persons who have been convicted of money-laundering offenses in the city state after a S$3-billion ($2.34 billion) scandal that dented the Southeast Asian country’s reputation as a global financial center.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Crypto investors are watching the latest moves from twins Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss. According to blockchain tracking data, wallets linked to the
Share
Coinfomania2026/03/10 20:12
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

Laptop rental services are emerging as a popular choice. This is true, especially among businesses that require temporary equipment. Renting a laptop can be an
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 20:05