TLDR Swiss gambling authority Gespa has filed a criminal complaint against FIFA over its NFT platform. The complaint alleges that FIFA’s NFT competitions may qualify as unlicensed gambling under Swiss law. Gespa claims that users must pay to participate in challenges with the chance to win valuable digital assets. FIFA recently moved its NFT operations [...] The post FIFA Faces Criminal Charges in Switzerland Over NFT Reward Scheme appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR Swiss gambling authority Gespa has filed a criminal complaint against FIFA over its NFT platform. The complaint alleges that FIFA’s NFT competitions may qualify as unlicensed gambling under Swiss law. Gespa claims that users must pay to participate in challenges with the chance to win valuable digital assets. FIFA recently moved its NFT operations [...] The post FIFA Faces Criminal Charges in Switzerland Over NFT Reward Scheme appeared first on Blockonomi.

FIFA Faces Criminal Charges in Switzerland Over NFT Reward Scheme

TLDR

  • Swiss gambling authority Gespa has filed a criminal complaint against FIFA over its NFT platform.
  • The complaint alleges that FIFA’s NFT competitions may qualify as unlicensed gambling under Swiss law.
  • Gespa claims that users must pay to participate in challenges with the chance to win valuable digital assets.
  • FIFA recently moved its NFT operations to the Avalanche blockchain which may have introduced more lottery-like mechanics.
  • Gespa stated it only discovered the platform recently and offered to assist authorities but will not lead any prosecution.

The Swiss gambling regulator, Gespa, has filed a criminal complaint against FIFA regarding its NFT rewards platform. The regulator claims that FIFA’s NFT-linked competitions may breach gambling laws due to monetary stakes and potential winnings. Although non-binding, the complaint marks a serious legal development for FIFA’s digital ventures.

Gespa Alleges FIFA’s NFT Platform Breaks Swiss Law

Gespa submitted a one-page criminal complaint to Swiss authorities concerning FIFA’s NFT distribution model. It stated that FIFA offers competitions involving monetary stakes and prize-based outcomes. According to Gespa, this could meet the legal criteria for gambling.

The platform allows users to enter challenges or await random NFT drops, hoping to win valuable digital collectibles. FIFA switched its blockchain partner from Algorand to Avalanche, increasing activity and possibly introducing more lottery-like features. Gespa claims this new structure further blurs the line between digital collectibles and gambling.

“Various competitions related to [NFT] collectibles are offered,” Gespa wrote, citing the monetary stakes and reward system in place. Gespa also highlighted that entry into these competitions requires payment. Thus, it views them as either lotteries or forms of sports betting under Swiss gambling law.

Regulatory Action Remains Uncertain Despite Formal Complaint

While Gespa filed the complaint, it does not plan to lead any criminal prosecution itself. The agency noted that only law enforcement can determine whether FIFA’s NFT model violates Swiss law. Gespa offered cooperation but made it clear that it would not pursue charges directly.

The regulator claims it discovered FIFA’s NFT offerings only recently, despite the platform operating for years. Gespa’s fast response after this discovery signals growing concern over blockchain-linked games. However, its complaint remains brief and does not conclude on FIFA’s legal liability.

Gespa emphasized that it holds no official legal stance and simply flagged a potential legal issue. “Participation is only possible in exchange for a monetary stake,” the complaint added, reinforcing its concern. Still, Gespa released no further information, leaving enforcement to Swiss prosecutors.

FIFA May Pursue a Settlement or Alter Distribution Methods

FIFA may avoid litigation by adjusting its distribution of NFTs to comply with Swiss gambling regulations. Authorities have not confirmed if they will proceed with the case. Therefore, FIFA still has a path to negotiate with regulators.

The complaint may prompt FIFA to reform its promotional methods and digital asset sales. This could include removing any elements resembling betting or chance-based rewards. However, no official response from FIFA has been released yet.

With FIFA’s NFT presence expanding on Avalanche, legal clarity remains crucial for future offerings. Authorities must determine whether the current structure constitutes gambling. Until then, FIFA will continue to face ongoing scrutiny over its blockchain initiatives.

The post FIFA Faces Criminal Charges in Switzerland Over NFT Reward Scheme appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
AINFT Logo
AINFT Price(NFT)
$0.0000003561
$0.0000003561$0.0000003561
+0.08%
USD
AINFT (NFT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39