The post FIFA World Cup NFTs Slammed With Criminal Charges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gespa, a Swiss gambling authority, filed a criminal complaint against FIFA for its NFT collection. The regulator claimed that competitions for on-chain rewards may constitute unregistered betting. Still, though, this complaint is non-binding. Gespa offered to cooperate with any prosecution efforts, but it won’t spearhead a case itself. FIFA may be able to reach a non-litigious agreement with government officials. Sponsored Sponsored FIFA’s NFT Competitions Soccer and the crypto sector have had years of overlap at this point, and FIFA has been offering its own NFTs for quite some time. However, this trade may have brought some trouble to the football association, as Swiss authorities may pursue charges against FIFA in the near future. Specifically, Gespa, the Swiss Gambling Supervisory Authority, alleged in a criminal complaint that FIFA’s NFT offerings may constitute gambling. Rather than buying products directly, users enter challenges or await drops in the hope of receiving assets. Due to their monetary value, these NFTs may violate gambling regulations: “Various competitions related to [NFT] collectibles are offered [on FIFA platforms]…Participation in the competitions is only possible in exchange for a monetary stake, with monetary benefits to be won. From a gambling law perspective, the offers in question are partly lotteries and partly sports betting,” Gespa’s complaint read. Sponsored Sponsored New Distribution Schemes? So, why is this a problem now, after several years of operation? For one thing, FIFA switched its partner in NFT generation, using Avalanche instead of Algorand as its underlying blockchain. This brought a huge surge of activity to Avalanche and may have introduced further lottery-like mechanics into asset distribution. Additionally, Gespa claims that it only discovered FIFA’s NFT platform this month. Until then, the regulator was apparently unaware of the competitions, such as drops and challenges, that can allow users to win NFTs. We don’t… The post FIFA World Cup NFTs Slammed With Criminal Charges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gespa, a Swiss gambling authority, filed a criminal complaint against FIFA for its NFT collection. The regulator claimed that competitions for on-chain rewards may constitute unregistered betting. Still, though, this complaint is non-binding. Gespa offered to cooperate with any prosecution efforts, but it won’t spearhead a case itself. FIFA may be able to reach a non-litigious agreement with government officials. Sponsored Sponsored FIFA’s NFT Competitions Soccer and the crypto sector have had years of overlap at this point, and FIFA has been offering its own NFTs for quite some time. However, this trade may have brought some trouble to the football association, as Swiss authorities may pursue charges against FIFA in the near future. Specifically, Gespa, the Swiss Gambling Supervisory Authority, alleged in a criminal complaint that FIFA’s NFT offerings may constitute gambling. Rather than buying products directly, users enter challenges or await drops in the hope of receiving assets. Due to their monetary value, these NFTs may violate gambling regulations: “Various competitions related to [NFT] collectibles are offered [on FIFA platforms]…Participation in the competitions is only possible in exchange for a monetary stake, with monetary benefits to be won. From a gambling law perspective, the offers in question are partly lotteries and partly sports betting,” Gespa’s complaint read. Sponsored Sponsored New Distribution Schemes? So, why is this a problem now, after several years of operation? For one thing, FIFA switched its partner in NFT generation, using Avalanche instead of Algorand as its underlying blockchain. This brought a huge surge of activity to Avalanche and may have introduced further lottery-like mechanics into asset distribution. Additionally, Gespa claims that it only discovered FIFA’s NFT platform this month. Until then, the regulator was apparently unaware of the competitions, such as drops and challenges, that can allow users to win NFTs. We don’t…

FIFA World Cup NFTs Slammed With Criminal Charges

Gespa, a Swiss gambling authority, filed a criminal complaint against FIFA for its NFT collection. The regulator claimed that competitions for on-chain rewards may constitute unregistered betting.

Still, though, this complaint is non-binding. Gespa offered to cooperate with any prosecution efforts, but it won’t spearhead a case itself. FIFA may be able to reach a non-litigious agreement with government officials.

Sponsored

Sponsored

FIFA’s NFT Competitions

Soccer and the crypto sector have had years of overlap at this point, and FIFA has been offering its own NFTs for quite some time.

However, this trade may have brought some trouble to the football association, as Swiss authorities may pursue charges against FIFA in the near future.

Specifically, Gespa, the Swiss Gambling Supervisory Authority, alleged in a criminal complaint that FIFA’s NFT offerings may constitute gambling.

Rather than buying products directly, users enter challenges or await drops in the hope of receiving assets. Due to their monetary value, these NFTs may violate gambling regulations:

Sponsored

Sponsored

New Distribution Schemes?

So, why is this a problem now, after several years of operation? For one thing, FIFA switched its partner in NFT generation, using Avalanche instead of Algorand as its underlying blockchain.

This brought a huge surge of activity to Avalanche and may have introduced further lottery-like mechanics into asset distribution.

Additionally, Gespa claims that it only discovered FIFA’s NFT platform this month. Until then, the regulator was apparently unaware of the competitions, such as drops and challenges, that can allow users to win NFTs.

We don’t know what alerted Gespa to these activities, but its speed of response suggests that it’s concerned.

To be clear, though, the Swiss regulator’s complaint was only one page long. It claims that law enforcement has jurisdiction over whether or not FIFA’s NFT offerings violate the law; Gespa itself takes no official position on the subject.

It offered to assist future investigations but declined to release any more information itself.

In other words, there may be a non-litigious solution here. FIFA may be able to reform its NFT distribution scheme to avoid this complaint, or the association may reach another agreement with Swiss regulators.

For now, though, we’ll have to see if local authorities attempt to pursue Gespa’s case.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/fifa-world-cup-nft-criminal-charges-gambling/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date

Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date

The post Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jonah Wren Phillips in “Bring Her Back.” A24 Bring Her Back, a new A24 horror movie from the filmmakers of the smash hit Talk to Me, is coming soon to HBO Max. Bring Her Back opened in theaters on May 30 before debuting on digital streaming via premium video on demand on July 1. The official logline for Bring Her Back reads, “A brother and sister uncover a terrifying ritual at the secluded home of their new foster mother.” Forbes‘South Park’ Season 27 Updated Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?By Tim Lammers Directed by twin brothers Danny Philippou and Michael Philippou, Bring Her Back stars Billy Barratt, Sora Wong, Jonah Wren Philips, Sally–Anne Upton, Stephen Philips, Mischa Heywood and Sally Hawkins. Warner Bros. Discovery announced on Wednesday that Bring Her Back will arrive on streaming on HBO Max on Friday, Oct. 3, and on HBO linear on Saturday, Oct. 4, at 8 p.m. ET. Prior to the debut of Bring Her Back on HBO on Oct. 4, the cable outlet will air the Philippou brothers’ 2022 horror hit Talk to Me. ForbesHit Horror Thriller ’28 Years Later’ Is New On Netflix This WeekBy Tim Lammers For viewers who don’t have HBO Max, the streaming platform offers three tiers: The ad-based tier costs $9.99 per month, while an ad-free tier is $16.99 per month. Additionally, an ad-free tier with 4K Ultra HD programming costs $20.99 per month. The Success Of ‘Talk To Me’ Weighed On The Minds Of Philippou Brothers While Making ‘Bring Her Back’ During the film’s theatrical run, Bring Her Back earned $19.3 million domestically and nearly $19.8 million internationally for a worldwide box office tally of $39.1 million. Bring Her Back had a production budget of $17 million before prints and advertising, according to The Numbers.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:23
XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13