The post how retail turned Bitcoin proxy plays into pain trade appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. There’s a grim symmetry to every crypto boom: an idea born from freedom eventually gets packaged, securitized, and sold back to the masses, this time at a hefty premium. According to a new 10XResearch report, retail investors have collectively lost $17 billion trying to gain indirect Bitcoin exposure through listed “digital asset treasury” companies like Metaplanet and Strategy. 10X Research report describes the great proxy trade The logic made sense on paper. Why bother managing a private wallet or navigating ETF inefficiencies when you could simply buy shares in firms that hold Bitcoin themselves? Strategy had turned this ‘strategy’ into something of a cult playbook. They inspired a wave of corporate imitators from Tokyo to Toronto. By mid‑2025, dozens of small to mid‑cap “Bitcoin treasuries” had emerged, some genuine, others opportunistic, pitching themselves as pure‑play proxies for Bitcoin’s upside. But there was one fatal flaw: valuation drift. 10X Research notes that at the height of the rally, the equity premiums on these stocks reached absurd levels. In some cases, companies traded at 40–50% above their net Bitcoin per‑share value. This was driven by momentum traders and retail enthusiasm rather than underlying assets. According to Bloomberg, it soon stopped being exposure to Bitcoin and became exposure to crowd psychology. When premiums meet reality As Bitcoin corrected 13% in October, the effect on these treasuries was magnified. The stocks didn’t just track Bitcoin lower. They cratered, wiping out paper wealth at more than double the rate of the underlying asset’s decline. Strategy fell nearly 35% from its recent peak, while Metaplanet plunged over 50%, erasing the majority of its speculative summer gains. For late‑entry retail holders, the drawdown wasn’t just painful; it was devastating. 10X Research estimates that since August, retail portfolios focused on digital asset treasury equities have collectively lost around $17 billion. This was… The post how retail turned Bitcoin proxy plays into pain trade appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. There’s a grim symmetry to every crypto boom: an idea born from freedom eventually gets packaged, securitized, and sold back to the masses, this time at a hefty premium. According to a new 10XResearch report, retail investors have collectively lost $17 billion trying to gain indirect Bitcoin exposure through listed “digital asset treasury” companies like Metaplanet and Strategy. 10X Research report describes the great proxy trade The logic made sense on paper. Why bother managing a private wallet or navigating ETF inefficiencies when you could simply buy shares in firms that hold Bitcoin themselves? Strategy had turned this ‘strategy’ into something of a cult playbook. They inspired a wave of corporate imitators from Tokyo to Toronto. By mid‑2025, dozens of small to mid‑cap “Bitcoin treasuries” had emerged, some genuine, others opportunistic, pitching themselves as pure‑play proxies for Bitcoin’s upside. But there was one fatal flaw: valuation drift. 10X Research notes that at the height of the rally, the equity premiums on these stocks reached absurd levels. In some cases, companies traded at 40–50% above their net Bitcoin per‑share value. This was driven by momentum traders and retail enthusiasm rather than underlying assets. According to Bloomberg, it soon stopped being exposure to Bitcoin and became exposure to crowd psychology. When premiums meet reality As Bitcoin corrected 13% in October, the effect on these treasuries was magnified. The stocks didn’t just track Bitcoin lower. They cratered, wiping out paper wealth at more than double the rate of the underlying asset’s decline. Strategy fell nearly 35% from its recent peak, while Metaplanet plunged over 50%, erasing the majority of its speculative summer gains. For late‑entry retail holders, the drawdown wasn’t just painful; it was devastating. 10X Research estimates that since August, retail portfolios focused on digital asset treasury equities have collectively lost around $17 billion. This was…

how retail turned Bitcoin proxy plays into pain trade

There’s a grim symmetry to every crypto boom: an idea born from freedom eventually gets packaged, securitized, and sold back to the masses, this time at a hefty premium. According to a new 10XResearch report, retail investors have collectively lost $17 billion trying to gain indirect Bitcoin exposure through listed “digital asset treasury” companies like Metaplanet and Strategy.

10X Research report describes the great proxy trade

The logic made sense on paper. Why bother managing a private wallet or navigating ETF inefficiencies when you could simply buy shares in firms that hold Bitcoin themselves? Strategy had turned this ‘strategy’ into something of a cult playbook. They inspired a wave of corporate imitators from Tokyo to Toronto.

By mid‑2025, dozens of small to mid‑cap “Bitcoin treasuries” had emerged, some genuine, others opportunistic, pitching themselves as pure‑play proxies for Bitcoin’s upside.

But there was one fatal flaw: valuation drift. 10X Research notes that at the height of the rally, the equity premiums on these stocks reached absurd levels. In some cases, companies traded at 40–50% above their net Bitcoin per‑share value. This was driven by momentum traders and retail enthusiasm rather than underlying assets. According to Bloomberg, it soon stopped being exposure to Bitcoin and became exposure to crowd psychology.

When premiums meet reality

As Bitcoin corrected 13% in October, the effect on these treasuries was magnified. The stocks didn’t just track Bitcoin lower. They cratered, wiping out paper wealth at more than double the rate of the underlying asset’s decline. Strategy fell nearly 35% from its recent peak, while Metaplanet plunged over 50%, erasing the majority of its speculative summer gains.

For late‑entry retail holders, the drawdown wasn’t just painful; it was devastating. 10X Research estimates that since August, retail portfolios focused on digital asset treasury equities have collectively lost around $17 billion. This was concentrated largely among unhedged individual investors in the U.S., Japan, and Europe.

The psychology of second‑order speculation

There is irony here: Bitcoin was designed as a self‑sovereign asset, outside the gatekeeping of financial intermediaries. Yet, as it became institutionalized, retail investors found themselves back in familiar territory, buying someone else’s version of Bitcoin through public equities.

These proxies came wrapped in glossy narratives of “corporate conviction,” complete with charismatic CEOs and open‑source branding. In practice, they turned out to be leveraged plays on Bitcoin using corporate balance sheets; a risky bet in a tightening liquidity environment.

When macro headwinds from Washington and Beijing triggered the latest wave of deleveraging, these proxy trades unwound with surgical precision. They hit the same investors who believed they’d found a smarter way to HODL.

A painful reminder

There’s little solace in the numbers. But for anyone watching Bitcoin’s cyclical dance between innovation and euphoria, the lesson stands. The closer crypto edges to traditional markets, the more it inherits their distortions. Owning an idea through a company that monetizes belief might be convenient, even exciting, but convenience has a cost.

As 10X Research put it bluntly, equity wrappers for digital assets are not substitutes for the assets themselves. In this chapter of the Bitcoin story, that difference has already cost retail investors 17 billion reasons to remember why decentralization was so appealing in the first place.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/the-17-billion-lesson-how-retail-turned-bitcoin-proxy-plays-into-pain-trade/

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0,04881
$0,04881$0,04881
-2,96%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Craft Ventures Opens Austin Office

Craft Ventures Opens Austin Office

AUSTIN, Texas–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Craft Ventures, the venture capital firm co-founded in 2017 by David Sacks and Bill Lee, has opened a new office in Austin, Texas,
Share
AI Journal2026/01/01 08:00
Paxos launches new startup to help institutions offer DeFi products

Paxos launches new startup to help institutions offer DeFi products

PANews reported on June 19 that according to The Block, the stablecoin issuer Paxos launched a new startup Paxos Labs, which aims to help institutions integrate DeFi and on-chain products
Share
PANews2025/06/19 00:04