Roman Storm, a developer behind the decentralized privacy protocol Tornado Cash, has raised concerns within the open source community regarding potential retroactive prosecution by U.S. authorities. Storm questioned the certainty of avoiding charges under the premise that building non-custodial DeFi platforms might be considered illegal, sparking a debate over the legal risks faced by open-source [...]Roman Storm, a developer behind the decentralized privacy protocol Tornado Cash, has raised concerns within the open source community regarding potential retroactive prosecution by U.S. authorities. Storm questioned the certainty of avoiding charges under the premise that building non-custodial DeFi platforms might be considered illegal, sparking a debate over the legal risks faced by open-source [...]

Tornado Cash Developer Roman Storm Warns of Threat of Retroactive Prosecution

Roman Storm, a developer behind the decentralized privacy protocol Tornado Cash, has raised concerns within the open source community regarding potential retroactive prosecution by U.S. authorities. Storm questioned the certainty of avoiding charges under the premise that building non-custodial DeFi platforms might be considered illegal, sparking a debate over the legal risks faced by open-source crypto developers. This comes amid Storm’s recent conviction for operating an unlicensed money transfer service, intensifying discussions on crypto regulation and privacy rights in the evolving landscape of blockchain.

  • Roman Storm, Tornado Cash developer, questions possible DOJ prosecution of DeFi developers for creating decentralized protocols.
  • Storm’s recent conviction for operating an unlicensed money transfer service highlights ongoing legal challenges in open-source crypto development.
  • Legal experts debate whether the U.S. might pursue further charges against Storm, with some suggesting retrials are unlikely.
  • U.S. DOJ officials emphasize that coding for privacy, without malicious intent, should not be a crime, signaling a nuanced approach to crypto regulation.
  • The case highlights the contentious balance between crypto privacy, innovation, and regulatory oversight in the United States.

Roman Storm, a key figure behind Tornado Cash, posed a provocative question to the open-source crypto community regarding the potential risks of legal action by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). He asked how developers can be certain they won’t face charges as money service businesses for creating decentralized finance platforms, which are inherently non-custodial. Storm’s concern stems from the DOJ’s approach, which has historically blurred the lines for DeFi and privacy-focused protocols.

Storm, recently convicted of conspiracy related to unlicensed money transmission, insists that Tornado Cash operates purely as a decentralized protocol, beyond the control of any single entity. In court documents, Storm emphasized, “Our company does not have any ability to affect any change, or take any action, with respect to the Tornado Cash protocol — it is a decentralized software protocol that no one entity or actor can control.”

Source: Roman Storm

Despite his conviction, Storm’s legal team recently filed a motion for acquittal, arguing that the government’s case was flawed. The legal attack against Tornado Cash has sent shockwaves through the crypto community, which regards privacy-preserving protocols as vital to the future of digital assets.

The Fight for Privacy in a Changing Regulatory Landscape

Following Storm’s conviction, legal experts have debated whether the DOJ will pursue further charges related to money laundering or sanctions violations. The jury, during its deliberations, was deadlocked on multiple counts, ultimately convicting Storm only on the charge of operating an unlicensed money transmission.

Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at Variant Fund, noted that “if the Trump administration intends to position the United States as a global leader in crypto innovation, then the DOJ should refrain from retrying the deadlocked charges.”

DOJ official addressesDOJ official Matthew Galeotti at the American Innovation Project summit. Source: American Innovation Project

Moreover, Matthew Galeotti, acting assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s criminal division, indicated that the department would not pursue retrials in Storm’s case and clarified that writing code, in itself, without malicious intent, should not constitute a crime. His remarks highlight a cautious approach to balancing innovation and regulation within the American crypto landscape.

As the debate continues, the broader implications for privacy-centric protocols, DeFi development, and crypto regulation remain uncertain, underscoring the ongoing clash between decentralized innovation and government oversight in the US.

This article was originally published as Tornado Cash Developer Roman Storm Warns of Threat of Retroactive Prosecution on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Market Opportunity
Storm Trade Logo
Storm Trade Price(STORM)
$0.00728
$0.00728$0.00728
-3.70%
USD
Storm Trade (STORM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time

Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time

The post Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FARMINGDALE, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 28: (L-R) Scottie Scheffler of Team
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 07:21
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Read Trend And Momentum Across Markets

Read Trend And Momentum Across Markets

The post Read Trend And Momentum Across Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Widely used in technical analysis, the MACD indicator helps traders read trend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 07:14