The post Tornado Cash Dev Roman Storm Warns Community About Retroactive Prosecution appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Roman Storm, a developer of the Tornado Cash privacy-preserving protocol, asked the open source software community whether they are concerned with being retroactively prosecuted by the US Department of Justice for developing decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. Storm asked DeFi developers: “How can you be so sure you won’t be charged by the DOJ as a money service business for building a non-custodial protocol?”  The DOJ could prosecute a case, arguing that any decentralized, non-custodial service should have been developed as a custodial service, as it did in the case against him, Storm added, citing his recent motion for acquittal, which was filed on September 30. Source: Roman Storm “Our company does not have any ability to affect any change, or take any action, with respect to the Tornado Cash protocol — it is a decentralized software protocol that no one entity or actor can control,” Storm is quoted as saying in the acquittal documents. Storm was convicted in August on one of three counts; the jury found him guilty of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmission business, setting a dangerous legal precedent for open source software developers and sending shockwaves through the crypto community. Related: UK renews Apple iCloud backdoor push, threatening crypto wallet security The fight for privacy continues Following the verdict, legal experts debated whether US prosecutors would pursue the money laundering and sanctions charges against Storm in another trial. The Jury was gridlocked during deliberations and failed to come to a unanimous consensus on those counts, finding Storm guilty on just the unlicensed money transmitter charge. “If the Trump administration wants the USA to be the crypto capital of the world, then the DOJ must not be allowed to retry the two deadlocked charges,” Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at venture capital firm Variant Fund, wrote… The post Tornado Cash Dev Roman Storm Warns Community About Retroactive Prosecution appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Roman Storm, a developer of the Tornado Cash privacy-preserving protocol, asked the open source software community whether they are concerned with being retroactively prosecuted by the US Department of Justice for developing decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. Storm asked DeFi developers: “How can you be so sure you won’t be charged by the DOJ as a money service business for building a non-custodial protocol?”  The DOJ could prosecute a case, arguing that any decentralized, non-custodial service should have been developed as a custodial service, as it did in the case against him, Storm added, citing his recent motion for acquittal, which was filed on September 30. Source: Roman Storm “Our company does not have any ability to affect any change, or take any action, with respect to the Tornado Cash protocol — it is a decentralized software protocol that no one entity or actor can control,” Storm is quoted as saying in the acquittal documents. Storm was convicted in August on one of three counts; the jury found him guilty of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmission business, setting a dangerous legal precedent for open source software developers and sending shockwaves through the crypto community. Related: UK renews Apple iCloud backdoor push, threatening crypto wallet security The fight for privacy continues Following the verdict, legal experts debated whether US prosecutors would pursue the money laundering and sanctions charges against Storm in another trial. The Jury was gridlocked during deliberations and failed to come to a unanimous consensus on those counts, finding Storm guilty on just the unlicensed money transmitter charge. “If the Trump administration wants the USA to be the crypto capital of the world, then the DOJ must not be allowed to retry the two deadlocked charges,” Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at venture capital firm Variant Fund, wrote…

Tornado Cash Dev Roman Storm Warns Community About Retroactive Prosecution

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Roman Storm, a developer of the Tornado Cash privacy-preserving protocol, asked the open source software community whether they are concerned with being retroactively prosecuted by the US Department of Justice for developing decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms.

Storm asked DeFi developers: “How can you be so sure you won’t be charged by the DOJ as a money service business for building a non-custodial protocol?” 

The DOJ could prosecute a case, arguing that any decentralized, non-custodial service should have been developed as a custodial service, as it did in the case against him, Storm added, citing his recent motion for acquittal, which was filed on September 30.

Source: Roman Storm

“Our company does not have any ability to affect any change, or take any action, with respect to the Tornado Cash protocol — it is a decentralized software protocol that no one entity or actor can control,” Storm is quoted as saying in the acquittal documents.

Storm was convicted in August on one of three counts; the jury found him guilty of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmission business, setting a dangerous legal precedent for open source software developers and sending shockwaves through the crypto community.

Related: UK renews Apple iCloud backdoor push, threatening crypto wallet security

The fight for privacy continues

Following the verdict, legal experts debated whether US prosecutors would pursue the money laundering and sanctions charges against Storm in another trial.

The Jury was gridlocked during deliberations and failed to come to a unanimous consensus on those counts, finding Storm guilty on just the unlicensed money transmitter charge.

“If the Trump administration wants the USA to be the crypto capital of the world, then the DOJ must not be allowed to retry the two deadlocked charges,” Jake Chervinsky, chief legal officer at venture capital firm Variant Fund, wrote on X at the time.

DOJ official Matthew Galeotti addresses the audience at the American Innovation Project summit. Source: American Innovation Project

Matthew Galeotti, the acting assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s criminal division, signaled in August that the DOJ would not initiate a retrial of Storm and would not prosecute similar cases.

“Our view is that merely writing code, without ill intent, is not a crime,” Galeotti told the audience at the American Innovation Project Summit, an event for regulatory advocacy and pro-crypto legislation in the US.

“The department will not use indictments as a law-making tool. The department should not leave innovators guessing as to what could lead to criminal prosecution,” he added.

Magazine: Can privacy survive in US crypto policy after Roman Storm’s conviction?

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/roman-storm-asks-defi-devs-doj-won-t-charge?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Storm Trade Logo
Storm Trade Price(STORM)
$0.006469
$0.006469$0.006469
-1.41%
USD
Storm Trade (STORM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler (@Traveler2236), a well-known crypto commentator and enthusiast, has shared a detailed projection for XRP’s price progression in 2026. His forecast
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/11 21:31
The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The first quarter of 2026 has been anything but quiet for taxpayers. Along with the preparations for filing income tax returns, the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/11 20:30
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34