On Oct. 20, 2025, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, took to X to urge the U.S. government to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes using blockchain. “When bad guys innovate in financial crime, good guys need innovation to keep pace,” said Grewal.…On Oct. 20, 2025, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, took to X to urge the U.S. government to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes using blockchain. “When bad guys innovate in financial crime, good guys need innovation to keep pace,” said Grewal.…

Coinbase CLO to Treasury: modernize AML with AI and blockchain

2025/10/22 03:22

On Oct. 20, 2025, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, took to X to urge the U.S. government to fight cryptocurrency-related crimes using blockchain. “When bad guys innovate in financial crime, good guys need innovation to keep pace,” said Grewal. He shared an open letter he penned on behalf of Coinbase, providing the government with recommendations on approaching crypto crime.

Summary
  • The letter is a response to the U.S. Treasury’s request for comment on “innovative methods to detect illicit activity involving digital assets.”
  • In a series of posts accompanying the open letter, Grewal outlined several policymaking directions aimed at enhancing AML practices through AI, zero-knowledge proofs, etc.
  • The letter itself proposes to amend the Bank Secrecy Act and set a number of guidelines aimed at modernizing identity verification rules.
  • It is not the first time that Grewal has given recommendations to the USG on how to treat the burgeoning crypto sector. In 2024-2025, Grewal was calling out Operation Choke Point 2.0, a practice halted by the Trump Administration in 2025.

Grewal’s message 

Paul Grewal released the letter to the U.S. Treasury on Oct. 17. He shared the link to it on Oct. 20, concluding an X thread. In X posts, Grewal gave the U.S. Treasury four recommendations. He urged the U.S. government to:

  • Facilitate responsible use of AI to improve AML compliance by companies under the Bank Secrecy Act. It includes transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting. Regulations should focus on governance and outcomes and move away from the one-size-fits-all model.
  • Create guidance that will define the way API-driven AML compliance technologies will be regulated. The guidance should include acceptable use cases, data privacy requirements, and interoperability standards.
  • Amend the Bank Secrecy Act to use zero-knowledge proofs and decentralized identification as part of customer identification practices.
  • Create guidance that would explicitly recognize and incentivize the use of blockchain-based methods for analysis as a more effective AML compliance tool.

In an introduction to these recommendations, Grewal emphasized that “good guys” (U.S. Treasury and Congress) should be as innovative as “bad guys” and can follow Grewal’s recommendations to “underscore [the] reality.”

What’s in the Coinbase letter?

In a 40-page letter, Grewal thanked the U.S. Treasury for the opportunity to propose some solutions for fighting crime associated with digital assets.

In an executive summary, Grewal noted that Treasury’s request for comments came when money-laundering schemes had become very sophisticated. Advanced technologies allow criminal transactions to move at high speed and in large volumes.

To fight this, Grewal proposed using blockchain and other innovative solutions to detect illicit activity and modernize the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 and the Bank Secrecy Act. Modernization entails deleting redundant and outdated provisions.

The letter gives recommendations on each of the Treasury requests’ topics.

Regarding the use of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), Grewal wrote that the Treasury should facilitate the adoption of APIs through regulation. This would help financial institutions use them to maintain AML/CFT norms. The Treasury needs to issue guidance under the Bank Secrecy Act. APIs will allow institutions to get data from various blockchains and analytics platforms in a timely manner. API regulation should address problems such as lack of standardization and data quality issues.

Another topic is the use of artificial intelligence. According to Grewal, the Treasury should adopt responsible use of AI in AML compliance. He believes it will revolutionize the way law enforcement and institutions fight illicit activity. He believes AI will reduce false positives, enable real-time processing at scale, and free up resources needed for higher-risk activity.

As for digital identification, Grewal advocated for updating guidelines to ensure decentralized identification and zero-knowledge proofs are included in the approved identity verification process (“specifically through amending Financial Crimes Enforcement Network regulations or issuing guidance that authorizes these forms of digital identification as an acceptable form of non-documentary verification”). The new guidance should allow interoperability of identity ecosystems and reuse of identification data. Grewal emphasized that the existing Bank Secrecy Act’s customer identification policy is outdated and dangerous. Grewal recommends allowing some forms of non-documentary verification.

In the Blockchain Technology section, Grewal called on the Treasury to explicitly recognize and incentivize the use of on-chain data, as it would improve AML/CFT compliance practices. It will require amending the Bank Secrecy Act. Grewal stressed that facilitating blockchain AML compliance via native technologies will make compliance more accurate, efficient, and protective of user data.

The rest of the letter is dedicated to answering specific questions from the Treasury’s “Request for comment on innovative methods to detect illicit activity involving digital assets.” It outlines risks, inefficiencies in the current rules, and other specific problems.

Earlier, Paul Grewal was a prominent figure in shedding light on Operation Choke Point 2.0, an effort by FinCEN to force banks to deny services for clients using cryptocurrency. Grewal used FOIA to acquire documents containing evidence of such actions. Eventually, Operation Choke Point 2.0 was halted under the Trump Administration.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals

Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals

BitcoinWorld Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals The financial world often keeps us on our toes, and Wednesday was no exception. Investors watched closely as the US stock market concluded the day with a mixed performance across its major indexes. This snapshot offers a crucial glimpse into current investor sentiment and economic undercurrents, prompting many to ask: what exactly happened? Understanding the Latest US Stock Market Movements On Wednesday, the closing bell brought a varied picture for the US stock market. While some indexes celebrated gains, others registered slight declines, creating a truly mixed bag for investors. The Dow Jones Industrial Average showed resilience, climbing by a notable 0.57%. This positive movement suggests strength in some of the larger, more established companies. Conversely, the S&P 500, a broader benchmark often seen as a barometer for the overall market, experienced a modest dip of 0.1%. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite also saw a slight retreat, sliding by 0.33%. This particular index often reflects investor sentiment towards growth stocks and the tech sector. These divergent outcomes highlight the complex dynamics currently at play within the American economy. It’s not simply a matter of “up” or “down” for the entire US stock market; rather, it’s a nuanced landscape where different sectors and company types are responding to unique pressures and opportunities. Why Did the US Stock Market See Mixed Results? When the US stock market delivers a mixed performance, it often points to a tug-of-war between various economic factors. Several elements could have contributed to Wednesday’s varied closings. For instance, positive corporate earnings reports from certain industries might have bolstered the Dow. At the same time, concerns over inflation, interest rate policies by the Federal Reserve, or even global economic uncertainties could have pressured growth stocks, affecting the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. Key considerations often include: Economic Data: Recent reports on employment, manufacturing, or consumer spending can sway market sentiment. Corporate Announcements: Strong or weak earnings forecasts from influential companies can significantly impact their respective sectors. Interest Rate Expectations: The prospect of higher or lower interest rates directly influences borrowing costs for businesses and consumer spending, affecting future profitability. Geopolitical Events: Global tensions or trade policies can introduce uncertainty, causing investors to become more cautious. Understanding these underlying drivers is crucial for anyone trying to make sense of daily market fluctuations in the US stock market. Navigating Volatility in the US Stock Market A mixed close, while not a dramatic downturn, serves as a reminder that market volatility is a constant companion for investors. For those involved in the US stock market, particularly individuals managing their portfolios, these days underscore the importance of a well-thought-out strategy. It’s important not to react impulsively to daily movements. Instead, consider these actionable insights: Diversification: Spreading investments across different sectors and asset classes can help mitigate risk when one area underperforms. Long-Term Perspective: Focusing on long-term financial goals rather than short-term gains can help weather daily market swings. Stay Informed: Keeping abreast of economic news and company fundamentals provides context for market behavior. Consult Experts: Financial advisors can offer personalized guidance based on individual risk tolerance and objectives. Even small movements in major indexes can signal shifts that require attention, guiding future investment decisions within the dynamic US stock market. What’s Next for the US Stock Market? Looking ahead, investors will be keenly watching for further economic indicators and corporate announcements to gauge the direction of the US stock market. Upcoming inflation data, statements from the Federal Reserve, and quarterly earnings reports will likely provide more clarity. The interplay of these factors will continue to shape investor confidence and, consequently, the performance of the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq. Remaining informed and adaptive will be key to understanding the market’s trajectory. Conclusion: Wednesday’s mixed close in the US stock market highlights the intricate balance of forces influencing financial markets. While the Dow showed strength, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq experienced slight declines, reflecting a nuanced economic landscape. This reminds us that understanding the ‘why’ behind these movements is as important as the movements themselves. As always, a thoughtful, informed approach remains the best strategy for navigating the complexities of the market. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does a “mixed close” mean for the US stock market? A1: A mixed close indicates that while some major stock indexes advanced, others declined. It suggests that different sectors or types of companies within the US stock market are experiencing varying influences, rather than a uniform market movement. Q2: Which major indexes were affected on Wednesday? A2: On Wednesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.57%, while the S&P 500 edged down 0.1%, and the Nasdaq Composite slid 0.33%, illustrating the mixed performance across the US stock market. Q3: What factors contribute to a mixed stock market performance? A3: Mixed performances in the US stock market can be influenced by various factors, including specific corporate earnings, economic data releases, shifts in interest rate expectations, and broader geopolitical events that affect different market segments uniquely. Q4: How should investors react to mixed market signals? A4: Investors are generally advised to maintain a long-term perspective, diversify their portfolios, stay informed about economic news, and avoid impulsive decisions. Consulting a financial advisor can also provide personalized guidance for navigating the US stock market. Q5: What indicators should investors watch for future US stock market trends? A5: Key indicators to watch include upcoming inflation reports, statements from the Federal Reserve regarding monetary policy, and quarterly corporate earnings reports. These will offer insights into the future direction of the US stock market. Did you find this analysis of the US stock market helpful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand the nuances of current financial trends! To learn more about the latest stock market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the US stock market‘s future performance. This post Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 05:30