Japan’s Physical Gold ETF traded up to 16% above its NAV this week, the highest premium globally.Japan’s Physical Gold ETF traded up to 16% above its NAV this week, the highest premium globally.

Japan ETF jumps to 14% premium as demand overwhelms physical-gold supply

2025/10/22 17:50
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

The Japan Physical Gold ETF, the country’s biggest gold-backed fund, is now trading at a 14% premium to NAV, even after investors were warned about rising risks.

The fund, which holds physical gold stored inside Japan, soared as much as 16% above its actual asset value earlier this week before dropping. This surge came despite the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) putting out a warning on Friday to investors, telling them to monitor the premium-versus-value gap, which had been stretching for days.

This comes as gold itself suffered its biggest price crash in more than a decade. On Tuesday, spot prices of the metal dropped by 6.3%, the worst single-day slump in over 12 years.

Then on Wednesday, the ETF’s price tumbled 11%, reversing part of the earlier rally. Still, the premium remains, and that’s making investors nervous. This ETF now holds ¥1.25 trillion, or roughly $8.2 billion in assets, according to Bloomberg.

TSE warns as premium widens beyond global norms

The Japan Physical Gold ETF is now far removed from how other global funds behave. Its premium-to-NAV gap is the widest in the world, with similar ETFs like the Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF, abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF, and iShares Physical Gold ETF all staying within a 4% margin for the last 10 years.

Japan’s fund blew past that number, crossing 16% at its peak, showing just how hot demand has gotten, and how local behavior is decoupling from real gold prices.

Most other Japanese ETFs don’t even hold real metal. The iShares Gold ETF buys into a London-listed fund, backed by foreign vaults.

Meanwhile, the NF Gold Price ETF is linked to futures-based contracts, not physical bars. That makes the Japan Physical Gold ETF the only game in town for people who want local exposure to real bullion, and that’s clearly pushed it into overdrive.

Even with the drop, the fund only pared its loss to 7% by Wednesday afternoon, still showing strong demand. Meanwhile, spot gold was hovering near $4,140 per ounce, trying to recover from Tuesday’s collapse.

Silver was even more chaotic, briefly losing 8.7% before climbing again. Traders pointed to overheated technical indicators for both metals that had been running hot since mid-August.

Traders hedge as volatility in gold surges again

The crash didn’t come out of nowhere. Since August, gold had climbed close to 60% on the back of the “debasement trade,” bets that the U.S. government’s ballooning deficit and a possible rate cut by President Trump’s Federal Reserve would keep eroding trust in fiat. Investors fled into gold, dumping currencies and debt. But that rally got overheated, and the market snapped hard this week.

The volatility isn’t over. Even though prices have calmed for now, traders are jumping into options contracts to guard against more swings.

One-month implied volatility has jumped to levels last seen in March 2022. Despite the mess, some players still think gold has legs. Anna Wu, a cross-asset strategist at Van Eck Associates Corp. in Sydney, said the move wasn’t “massively contagious,” adding that, “Gold, despite its strong run recently, still shoulders an important haven role. Central banks have not stopped buying, nor private capital.”

Meanwhile, silver is putting on a show of its own. In London, a supply squeeze last week pushed silver prices above 1980 highs, forcing traders to airlift metal into the UK just to ease the pressure.

In Asia, the Shanghai Futures Exchange saw its largest one-day outflow of silver since February, and New York stockpiles dropped too.

Still, the ETF story is about price disconnects. Kei Okazaki, senior manager at the TSE’s ETF Market Development Department, didn’t mince words. “The declining linkage between the ETF prices and the gold market, coupled with investors buying at expensive prices, is problematic,” he said.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
Navcoin Logo
Navcoin Price(NAV)
$0.03397
$0.03397$0.03397
+0.38%
USD
Navcoin (NAV) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25