This article outlines the evaluation metrics used to benchmark 3D avatar reconstruction models on the AMASS motion capture dataset. Key metrics include reconstruction accuracyThis article outlines the evaluation metrics used to benchmark 3D avatar reconstruction models on the AMASS motion capture dataset. Key metrics include reconstruction accuracy

Quantifying Motion Accuracy: MPJRE, MPJPE, and Consistency Metrics for HMD-based Avatar Generation

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Related Work

    2.1. Motion Reconstruction from Sparse Input

    2.2. Human Motion Generation

  2. SAGE: Stratified Avatar Generation and 3.1. Problem Statement and Notation

    3.2. Disentangled Motion Representation

    3.3. Stratified Motion Diffusion

    3.4. Implementation Details

  3. Experiments and Evaluation Metrics

    4.1. Dataset and Evaluation Metrics

    4.2. Quantitative and Qualitative Results

    4.3. Ablation Study

  4. Conclusion and References

\ Supplementary Material

A. Extra Ablation Studies

B. Implementation Details

4. Experiments and Evaluation Metrics

4.1. Dataset and Evaluation Metrics

We train and evaluate our method on AMASS [25], which unifies multiple motion capture datasets [2, 4, 6, 12, 23, 26, 28, 37, 41–43] as SMPL [22] representations.

\ We report several metrics for evaluations and comparisons: mean per joint rotation error (MPJRE) and mean per joint position error (MPJPE) for measuring the average relative rotation and position error across all joints respectively, as well as the average position error of the root joints (Root PE), hand joints (Hand PE), upper-body joints (Upper PE), and lower-body joints (Lower PE).

\ Besides the above reconstruction accuracy, we also evaluate the spatial and temporal consistency of the generated sequences, as it significantly contributes to the visual quality. Specifically, we calculate the mean per joint velocity error (MPJVE) and Jitter, where MPJVE measures the average velocity error of all body joints, and Jitter quantifies the average jerk (time derivative of acceleration) of all body joints. In both cases, lower values indicate better results.

\

:::info Authors:

(1) Han Feng, equal contributions, ordered by alphabet from Wuhan University;

(2) Wenchao Ma, equal contributions, ordered by alphabet from Pennsylvania State University;

(3) Quankai Gao, University of Southern California;

(4) Xianwei Zheng, Wuhan University;

(5) Nan Xue, Ant Group ([email protected]);

(6) Huijuan Xu, Pennsylvania State University.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.