The post Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Founders allegedly used one-sided liquidity pools to extract around $107 M from the LIBRA token launch. The complaint states that over 760 M LIBRA tokens (76% of supply) were transferred by insiders shortly after minting. The court ordered freeze of approx. $110 M in LIBRA proceeds and ~$57.65 M USDC in specific wallets. Plaintiffs claim founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated at least 15 tokens and used the names of Melania Trump and Javier Milei as promotional fronts. A U.S. class-action lawsuit now accuses crypto startup founder Benjamin Chow of running a pump-and-dump network around meme coins such as “MELANIA” and “LIBRA”.  Investors allege Chow used his firm and associates to launch tokens tied to major names, leading to rapid collapses and big losses for retail buyers. A recent court order froze roughly $57.65 million in USDC and approx. $110 million in token-proceeds held in wallets controlled by the defendants.  The filing, part of the case Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures, lays out detailed liquidity-manipulation allegations and claims a coordinated scheme spanning at least fifteen tokens. Source: court filing and public coverage. Token scheme and crypto price manipulation with LIBRA The complaint alleges that the token known as LIBRA was marketed as a tool to fund small businesses in Argentina and was backed by public figure Javier Milei. Yet the filing claims the promotional story masked a design to inflate crypto price and allow insiders to cash out. Specifically, the document states that Kelsier Ventures and its team minted one billion LIBRA tokens, then transferred about 760 million (76 % of supply) into wallets they controlled. It further alleges that under the infrastructure provided by Chow’s firm Meteora, the team used single-sided liquidity pools that allowed insiders to extract stable assets such as USDC and SOL. According to the complaint, within hours of the launch investors lost as much as 94 %… The post Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR: Founders allegedly used one-sided liquidity pools to extract around $107 M from the LIBRA token launch. The complaint states that over 760 M LIBRA tokens (76% of supply) were transferred by insiders shortly after minting. The court ordered freeze of approx. $110 M in LIBRA proceeds and ~$57.65 M USDC in specific wallets. Plaintiffs claim founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated at least 15 tokens and used the names of Melania Trump and Javier Milei as promotional fronts. A U.S. class-action lawsuit now accuses crypto startup founder Benjamin Chow of running a pump-and-dump network around meme coins such as “MELANIA” and “LIBRA”.  Investors allege Chow used his firm and associates to launch tokens tied to major names, leading to rapid collapses and big losses for retail buyers. A recent court order froze roughly $57.65 million in USDC and approx. $110 million in token-proceeds held in wallets controlled by the defendants.  The filing, part of the case Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures, lays out detailed liquidity-manipulation allegations and claims a coordinated scheme spanning at least fifteen tokens. Source: court filing and public coverage. Token scheme and crypto price manipulation with LIBRA The complaint alleges that the token known as LIBRA was marketed as a tool to fund small businesses in Argentina and was backed by public figure Javier Milei. Yet the filing claims the promotional story masked a design to inflate crypto price and allow insiders to cash out. Specifically, the document states that Kelsier Ventures and its team minted one billion LIBRA tokens, then transferred about 760 million (76 % of supply) into wallets they controlled. It further alleges that under the infrastructure provided by Chow’s firm Meteora, the team used single-sided liquidity pools that allowed insiders to extract stable assets such as USDC and SOL. According to the complaint, within hours of the launch investors lost as much as 94 %…

Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

TLDR:

  • Founders allegedly used one-sided liquidity pools to extract around $107 M from the LIBRA token launch.
  • The complaint states that over 760 M LIBRA tokens (76% of supply) were transferred by insiders shortly after minting.
  • The court ordered freeze of approx. $110 M in LIBRA proceeds and ~$57.65 M USDC in specific wallets.
  • Plaintiffs claim founder Benjamin Chow orchestrated at least 15 tokens and used the names of Melania Trump and Javier Milei as promotional fronts.

A U.S. class-action lawsuit now accuses crypto startup founder Benjamin Chow of running a pump-and-dump network around meme coins such as “MELANIA” and “LIBRA”. 

Investors allege Chow used his firm and associates to launch tokens tied to major names, leading to rapid collapses and big losses for retail buyers. A recent court order froze roughly $57.65 million in USDC and approx. $110 million in token-proceeds held in wallets controlled by the defendants. 

The filing, part of the case Hurlock v. Kelsier Ventures, lays out detailed liquidity-manipulation allegations and claims a coordinated scheme spanning at least fifteen tokens. Source: court filing and public coverage.

Token scheme and crypto price manipulation with LIBRA

The complaint alleges that the token known as LIBRA was marketed as a tool to fund small businesses in Argentina and was backed by public figure Javier Milei. Yet the filing claims the promotional story masked a design to inflate crypto price and allow insiders to cash out.

Specifically, the document states that Kelsier Ventures and its team minted one billion LIBRA tokens, then transferred about 760 million (76 % of supply) into wallets they controlled. It further alleges that under the infrastructure provided by Chow’s firm Meteora, the team used single-sided liquidity pools that allowed insiders to extract stable assets such as USDC and SOL.

According to the complaint, within hours of the launch investors lost as much as 94 % of token value.

Founder role, promo fronts and the frozen assets order

According to the filing, Benjamin Chow sits “at the center of the enterprise”. He allegedly recruited a small network including the Davis family via Kelsier Ventures and ran an infrastructure of at least fifteen pump-and-dump tokens.

The complaint claims that names like Melania Trump and Javier Milei were used more as promotional props than genuine participants. The token “MELANIA” tied to Melania Trump reportedly surged then crashed by 99 %.

In its May 29 2025 order, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York froze “approximately $110 million in LIBRA proceeds” plus “approximately 57,654,371 USDC” in two identified wallets.

Later filings indicate the TRO was vacated and the USDC un-frozen after defense motion.

Investors and crypto traders should watch this case as it progresses. The outcome could influence how regulators and courts treat similar crypto token launches, price manipulation and the use of public-figure names in promotions.

The post Melania Trump and Javier Milei ‘Unwitting Faces’ of $57M Meme Coin Fraud, Suit Says appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/melania-trump-and-javier-milei-unwitting-faces-of-57m-meme-coin-fraud-suit-says/

Market Opportunity
Melania Meme Logo
Melania Meme Price(MELANIA)
$0.11178
$0.11178$0.11178
+4.29%
USD
Melania Meme (MELANIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

Uniswap trades at $3.88 with neutral RSI at 51.98. Technical analysis suggests potential breakout to $4.17 upper Bollinger Band, with bullish targets reaching $
Share
BlockChain News2026/03/12 17:21
Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Integrating AI into applications is a balancing act between performance, cost, and intelligence. Traditionally, high-performance AI models come with steep costs
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 16:55