Oil companies in India and China are scrambling to respond after President Donald Trump placed sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil producers, creating immediate shockwaves in two countries that have become Moscow’s largest customers during the Ukraine war. Several firms began dropping their orders to meet a November 21 deadline after Trump targeted Rosneft and Lukoil, […]Oil companies in India and China are scrambling to respond after President Donald Trump placed sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil producers, creating immediate shockwaves in two countries that have become Moscow’s largest customers during the Ukraine war. Several firms began dropping their orders to meet a November 21 deadline after Trump targeted Rosneft and Lukoil, […]

India, China come up on November 21 deadline as Trump's sanctions pressure Russia oil

Oil companies in India and China are scrambling to respond after President Donald Trump placed sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil producers, creating immediate shockwaves in two countries that have become Moscow’s largest customers during the Ukraine war.

Several firms began dropping their orders to meet a November 21 deadline after Trump targeted Rosneft and Lukoil, Russia’s two largest oil companies, people familiar with the matter said.

India and China have largely ignored Trump’s previous demands to stop purchasing Russian oil. But the latest sanctions appear to be having an effect, at least for now. Industry experts say this may be temporary as businesses work out new methods to keep buying cheap Russian oil through middlemen and a fleet of ships with hidden owners.

The real impact of Trump’s sanctions on Russia will likely be determined by what happens in Asia.

Together, India and China buy from 3.5 to 4.5 million barrels of Russian oil every day. Much of this is imported from the companies that just got sanctioned, according to analysts as reported by CNN.

India caught between Moscow and Washington

India faces a tough decision. The country needs cheap energy and has long been friends with Moscow. But it also has growing ties with Washington. India hopes to improve relations with Trump after he placed 50% tariffs on Indian goods, yet its Russian oil purchases remain a problem.

China, which has been a big financial pillar for Russia since the war began, must weigh protecting its major oil companies against its important relationship with Russia and concerns about the war’s impact on Putin’s leadership.

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Western nations imposed bans on Russian crude oil, prompting Moscow to redirect its exports toward China and India. These two countries purchased large volumes, millions of barrels per day, at significantly reduced prices.

While this arrangement benefited Asian buyers, Western powers criticized it as indirectly supporting Russia’s war effort against Ukraine.

China and India justified their continued purchases by citing their domestic energy requirements. Yet recent developments suggest that the sanctions President Trump imposed on Rosneft and Lukoil are beginning to have an effect.

According to Farwa Aamer, Director of South Asia Initiatives at the Asia Society Policy Institute, these sanctions “will inevitably bring costs to the Russian economy.”

Major refiners step back

In China, several state-owned oil companies have stopped buying some Russian crude, according to Janiv Shah, a vice president at Rystad Energy who analyzes oil markets.

Between January and September this year, Reliance brought in just over 181 million barrels of Russian oil, based on data from Kpler, which monitors oil shipments.

On Monday, Indian Oil Corporation, India’s largest state-owned oil company, said it will follow all sanctions, the Press Trust of India reported.

Clayton Seigle, who chairs the energy and geopolitics program at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, said “India is in a tougher spot” because China’s market is less transparent and its companies worry less about US blacklisting.

If companies don’t comply, they risk severe financial consequences. The threatened sanctions could destroy their ability to borrow from US banks if they keep buying directly from Russia.

India’s foreign minister S. Jaishankar on Monday seemed to criticize Trump’s sanctions, calling the energy trade “increasingly constricted.”

Smaller players may fill the gap

While major Chinese companies may step back, analysts suggest smaller independent refineries, called “teapots,” might keep buying Russian oil through third-party sellers, though their capacity to take more is limited.

China’s foreign ministry said Thursday the country has “consistently opposed unilateral sanctions.”

New Delhi hasn’t publicly commented, but the sanctions put two of India’s key interests in direct conflict.

India’s economy and energy security now depend on cheap Russian crude from a historical friend. But its growing partnership with the US through the Quad security group is equally important to counter China’s expanding presence in the Indian Ocean.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$4.823
$4.823$4.823
-0.96%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely claiming partnership with ComEd

OpenVPP accused of falsely claiming partnership with ComEd

According to PANews on September 18th, on-chain sleuth ZachXBT reported that OpenVPP allegedly falsely claimed a partnership with US electric utility Commonwealth Edison ( ComEd ). ComEd responded, stating, "We have not partnered with them and have no intention of doing so."
Share
PANews2025/09/19 00:00
Haier Shines at Australian Open 2026: Official Partner Elevates the Game with Smart Innovation and Purpose

Haier Shines at Australian Open 2026: Official Partner Elevates the Game with Smart Innovation and Purpose

MELBOURNE, Australia, Jan. 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Haier, the world’s No.1 major home appliance brand, continues its strategic partnership with the Australian Open
Share
AI Journal2026/01/26 11:30