Bitcoin Core v30 quietly redefined what the network accepts. A soft fork enforced by full nodes is the only way to defend consensus and protect Bitcoin’s monetary role.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
OpenAI DALL-E3 by Author
Bitcoin Core v30 didn’t just push a bad relay policy. It formalized a dangerous consensus-adjacent behavior that allows arbitrary data—including potentially illegal content—to be stored on-chain. This undermines Bitcoin’s utility as a financial protocol, dilutes its blockspace incentive structure, and opens the door for real legal threats to node runners and miners.
What we’re dealing with is not a mempool issue. It’s a systemic shift away from monetary finality toward unbounded, protocol-level ambiguity. The only viable response—the only way to defend Bitcoin’s architecture—is a soft fork that reasserts validation limits at the consensus layer.
The Problem: Arbitrary Data as a De Facto Valid Use Case
When Bitcoin Core v30 uncapped OP_RETURN, it turned a formerly discouraged practice into a relay default. This broke a fragile but important deterrent that kept large-scale arbitrary data storage off the chain.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact
[email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.