The post Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Nov 01, 2025 12:56 International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves. Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews. Understanding Basel’s Current Framework The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision. Calls for Regulatory Revisions The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies. In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent… The post Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Nov 01, 2025 12:56 International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves. Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews. Understanding Basel’s Current Framework The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision. Calls for Regulatory Revisions The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies. In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent…

Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth



Ted Hisokawa
Nov 01, 2025 12:56

International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves.

Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews.

Understanding Basel’s Current Framework

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services.

Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision.

Calls for Regulatory Revisions

The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies.

In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent solutions are developed. The European Central Bank supports implementing existing rules first, while the U.S. and other regions are seeking revisions before these standards become mandatory.

Global Divergence and Future Outlook

While Basel Committee guidelines are non-binding, member jurisdictions typically adopt them. However, timelines vary, with Singapore delaying its implementation to ensure global alignment, and Hong Kong planning to introduce lighter requirements for licensed stablecoins in 2026.

The debate over crypto banking rules is intensifying as industry groups urge the Basel Committee to ease the capital burden on banks. These discussions are crucial as stablecoins could significantly impact global finance, with some reports predicting a potential $1 trillion shift from traditional banks to stablecoins by 2028.

As regulators and industry stakeholders continue to negotiate, the evolution of these rules will likely shape the future landscape of digital asset services in the banking sector.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source: https://blockchain.news/news/global-regulators-reevaluate-crypto-banking-rules-stablecoin-growth

Market Opportunity
LOOK Logo
LOOK Price(LOOK)
$0.00713
$0.00713$0.00713
+0.99%
USD
LOOK (LOOK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

The post Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy CEO Phong Le will join
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:48
Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

The White House reportedly took the lead during the latest Crypto Council meeting, narrowing the stablecoin rewards dispute that has delayed progress in the long
Share
Bitcoinist2026/02/21 15:30
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28