The European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times. The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union. Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross. National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly. “It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times. “Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.“ ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies. While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages. The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc. Divided Support Among Member States Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it. France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight. “This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October. Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift. Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.” Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position. Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations. Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs. “Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby. Broader Capital Markets Integration The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December. Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them. The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union. The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S. Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said. ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integrationThe European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times. The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union. Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross. National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly. “It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times. “Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.“ ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies. While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages. The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc. Divided Support Among Member States Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it. France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight. “This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October. Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift. Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.” Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position. Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations. Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs. “Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby. Broader Capital Markets Integration The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December. Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them. The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union. The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S. Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said. ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integration

EU Plans to Give ESMA Direct Power Over Crypto Exchanges

The European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times.

The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union.

Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.

The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla

Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency

The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross.

National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly.

It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times.

Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.

ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies.

While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages.

The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc.

Divided Support Among Member States

Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it.

France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight.

This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October.

Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift.

Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.

Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position.

Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations.

Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs.

Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby.

Broader Capital Markets Integration

The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December.

Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them.

The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union.

The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S.

Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said.

ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integration.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

The post Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday will conclude a two-day policymaking meeting and release a decision on whether to lower interest rates—following months of pressure and criticism from President Donald Trump—and potentially signal whether additional cuts are on the way. President Donald Trump has urged the central bank to “CUT INTEREST RATES, NOW, AND BIGGER” than they might plan to. Getty Images Key Facts The central bank is poised to cut interest rates by at least a quarter-point, down from the 4.25% to 4.5% range where they have been held since December to between 4% and 4.25%, as Wall Street has placed 100% odds of a rate cut, according to CME’s FedWatch, with higher odds (94%) on a quarter-point cut than a half-point (6%) reduction. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both Trump appointees, voted in July for a quarter-point reduction to rates, and they may dissent again in favor of a large cut alongside Stephen Miran, Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers’ chair, who was sworn in at the meeting’s start on Tuesday. It’s unclear whether other policymakers, including Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, will favor larger cuts or opt for no reduction. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in his Jackson Hole, Wyoming, address last month the central bank would likely consider a looser monetary policy, noting the “shifting balance of risks” on the U.S. economy “may warrant adjusting our policy stance.” David Mericle, an economist for Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note the “key question” for the Fed’s meeting is whether policymakers signal “this is likely the first in a series of consecutive cuts” as the central bank is anticipated to “acknowledge the softening in the labor market,” though they may not “nod to an October cut.” Mericle said he…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:23
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Recently, PANews interviewed Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain, to unravel the background of the establishment of this anonymous project, Berachain's PoL mechanism, the latest developments, and answered widely concerned topics such as airdrop expectations and new opportunities in the DeFi field.
Share
PANews2024/07/03 13:00