The European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times. The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union. Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross. National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly. “It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times. “Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.“ ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies. While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages. The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc. Divided Support Among Member States Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it. France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight. “This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October. Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift. Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.” Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position. Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations. Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs. “Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby. Broader Capital Markets Integration The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December. Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them. The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union. The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S. Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said. ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integrationThe European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times. The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union. Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross. National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly. “It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times. “Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.“ ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies. While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages. The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc. Divided Support Among Member States Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it. France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight. “This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October. Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift. Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.” Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position. Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations. Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs. “Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby. Broader Capital Markets Integration The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December. Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them. The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union. The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S. Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said. ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integration

EU Plans to Give ESMA Direct Power Over Crypto Exchanges

2025/11/04 00:19
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

The European Commission is advancing proposals to shift direct supervisory authority over crypto exchanges, stock exchanges, and clearing houses to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), according to the Financial Times.

The move aims to eliminate regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s 27 member states and strengthen the bloc’s capital markets union.

Under the plan, ESMA would assume oversight of “the most significant cross-border entities,” including crypto asset service providers currently regulated under individual national authorities through the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.

The initiative has gained backing from ECB President Christine Lagarde and her predecessor, Mario Draghi, who highlighted centralized supervision as essential for European competitiveness against the U.S.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, at the European Central Bank Governors’ Meeting, Frankfurt | Source: Al Majalla

Fragmentation Undermines Market Efficiency

The current system has created significant inefficiencies, according to ESMA chair Verena Ross.

National regulators across all 27 member states had to build separate crypto supervision frameworks, a process she described as duplicative and costly.

It clearly takes a lot of effort from us and the national supervisors to achieve alignment,” Ross told the Financial Times.

Specific new resources had to be built up 27 times, once in each member state, which could have been done more efficiently at a European level.

ESMA’s July peer review of Malta’s Financial Services Authority exposed these inconsistencies.

While acknowledging adequate staffing, the review found Malta only “partially met expectations” in authorizing crypto asset service providers, with material issues left unaddressed during approval stages.

The Paris-based authority emphasized that consistent application of MiCA is essential for standardizing how crypto firms are licensed and supervised throughout the bloc.

Divided Support Among Member States

Germany’s government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz has recently signaled openness to centralized oversight after long opposing it.

France remains a strong backer, with Bank of France Governor François Villeroy de Galhau warning that the current passporting system risks regulatory loopholes and uneven oversight.

This framework would benefit from much stricter regulation of the multi-issuance of the same stablecoin within and outside the European Union, to reduce arbitrage risks in times of stress,” he said in October.

Meanwhile, smaller financial centers are resisting the shift.

Luxembourg Finance Minister Gilles Roth said his country prefers “supervisory convergence rather than creating a costly and ineffective centralized model.

Malta has explicitly rejected expanded ESMA powers, with its Financial Services Authority warning that centralization would introduce bureaucratic layers that would hinder competitiveness during a period when the EU is striving to enhance its global position.

Ireland and Luxembourg similarly fear the move could disadvantage their national financial sectors, remaining skeptical that EU regulators would act in the best interests of smaller nations.

Exchange groups and industry lobbies have raised concerns about higher compliance costs.

Expanding Esma’s supervisory responsibilities would mean higher fees paid by the industry,” said Marin Capelle, policy adviser at Efama, the fund industry lobby.

Broader Capital Markets Integration

The commission is expected to present its “markets integration package” in December.

Beyond crypto exchanges, ESMA would also gain binding dispute resolution powers between national supervisors overseeing large asset managers, though it would not directly supervise them.

The initiative forms part of a broader effort to complete the EU’s capital markets union.

The current landscape, with dozens of national and regional regulators and hundreds of trading institutions, raises costs for cross-border trades, a significant obstacle for startups scaling in Europe rather than the U.S.

Ross emphasized the need for capital markets to support the EU’s long-term goals. “This would provide a key impetus towards having a capital market in Europe that is more integrated and globally competitive,” she said.

ESMA will begin overseeing the consolidation of equity and bond prices, alongside ESG ratings, from 2026 onward. Cryptocurrency oversight would extend the regulator’s authority as Europe pushes for tighter market integration.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Xenea Wallet Daily Quiz March 16, 2026: Claim Your Free Crypto Coins Now

Xenea Wallet Daily Quiz March 16, 2026: Claim Your Free Crypto Coins Now

Xenea Wallet Daily Quiz Encourages Learning Through Rewards Educational features within blockchain platforms are becoming increasingly common as developers att
Share
Hokanews2026/03/16 04:33
Watch Out: Entering a Very Critical Week – Numerous Economic Developments and Altcoin Events Ahead This Week – Here’s the Day-by-Day, Hour-by-Hour Schedule

Watch Out: Entering a Very Critical Week – Numerous Economic Developments and Altcoin Events Ahead This Week – Here’s the Day-by-Day, Hour-by-Hour Schedule

The cryptocurrency market will witness numerous significant economic developments and altcoin events in the coming week. Here's the list. Continue Reading: Watch
Share
Bitcoinsistemi2026/03/16 04:21
VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs

VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs

The post VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Welcome to the US Crypto News Morning Briefing—your essential rundown of the most important developments in crypto for the day ahead. Grab a coffee because the firms shaping crypto’s future are not just building products, but also trying to reshape how capital flows. Crypto News of the Day: VanEck Maps Next Frontier of Crypto Venture Investing VanEck, a Wall Street player known for financial “firsts,” is pushing that legacy into Web3. The firsts include pioneering US gold funds and launching one of the earliest spot Bitcoin ETFs. Sponsored Sponsored “Financial instruments have always been a kind of tokenization. From seashells to traveler’s checks, from relational databases to today’s on-chain assets. You could even joke that VanEck’s first gold mutual funds were the original ‘tokenized gold,’” Juan C. Lopez, General Partner at VanEck Ventures, told BeInCrypto. That same instinct drives the firm’s venture bets. Lopez said VanEck goes beyond writing checks and brings the full weight of the firm. This extends from regulatory proximity to product experiments to founders building the next phase of crypto infrastructure. Asked about key investment priorities, Lopez highlighted stablecoins. “We care deeply about three questions: How do we accelerate stablecoin ubiquity? What will users want to do with them once highly distributed? And what net new assets can we construct now that we have sophisticated market infrastructure?” Lopez added. However, VanEck is not limiting itself to the hottest narrative, acknowledging that decentralized finance (DeFi) is having a renaissance. The VanEck executive also noted that success will depend on new approaches to identity and programmable compliance layered on public blockchains. Backing Legion With A New Model for ICOs Sponsored Sponsored That compliance-first angle explains VanEck Ventures’ recent co-lead of Legion’s $5 million seed round alongside Brevan Howard. Legion aims to reinvent token fundraising by making early-stage access…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:52