The post Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face. Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading. Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks. A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform. Wash Trading is the biggest problem in crypto A new research paper from Columbia University, published on November 7, 2025, via SSRN, analyzes on-chain data from @Polymarket a leading blockchain-based prediction market platform and concludes that approximately 25% of its total… — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) November 8, 2025 25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure. The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants. Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude.  In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that… The post Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face. Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading. Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks. A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform. Wash Trading is the biggest problem in crypto A new research paper from Columbia University, published on November 7, 2025, via SSRN, analyzes on-chain data from @Polymarket a leading blockchain-based prediction market platform and concludes that approximately 25% of its total… — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) November 8, 2025 25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure. The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants. Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude.  In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that…

Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market

  • Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face.
  • Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading.
  • Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks.

A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform.

25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated

Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure.

The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants.

Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading

According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude. 

In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that will prevent traders from cancelling orders until after 15 seconds. According to him, it would discourage manipulators from placing orders they do not intend to fill, thereby curtailing their ability to deceive other participants, particularly retail traders playing by the rules.

Two Kinds of Risks in Crypto Trading

It is worth noting that trading in cryptocurrencies involves significant risks. Most of the risks considered are typical and unavoidable; therefore, crypto traders must learn to manage their portfolios. However, artificially engineered risks add to the complications surrounding cryptocurrency trading and investment, leading many users to advocate for institutional support in the form of rules to guide and protect them from avoidable risks.

Related :  ZachXBT Issues Warning on ZEUS Token, Citing Founders’ Links to Market Manipulation

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/crypto-analyst-decries-the-negative-effect-of-wash-trading-on-the-crypto-market/

Market Opportunity
Effect AI Logo
Effect AI Price(EFFECT)
$0.005145
$0.005145$0.005145
+0.90%
USD
Effect AI (EFFECT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43
Top Streetwear Brands to Watch in 2026: Streetwear Studios Spotlight

Top Streetwear Brands to Watch in 2026: Streetwear Studios Spotlight

Introduction Streetwear has never been just about the clothes. It’s a cultural movement born in skate parks, underground music scenes, and urban streets—places
Share
Techbullion2026/01/05 13:06