PANews reported on November 9th that the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center released a technical analysis report on the LuBian mining pool hack that resulted in the theft of a huge amount of Bitcoin. The report indicated that a major hacking attack occurred at the LuBian mining pool in 2020, resulting in the theft of 127,272.06953176 Bitcoins (worth approximately $3.5 billion at the time, now worth $15 billion). The holder of this huge amount of Bitcoins was identified as Chen Zhi, chairman of the Prince Group of Cambodia. Following the attack, the Bitcoins remained untouched in a wallet address controlled by the attackers for four years, almost entirely untouched. This is clearly inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers eager to cash out and pursue profits, suggesting a precise operation orchestrated by a "nation-state hacking organization." The stolen Bitcoins were only transferred to a new Bitcoin wallet address in June 2024 and have remained untouched ever since. On October 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against Chen Zhi and the seizure of 127,000 Bitcoins from Chen Zhi and his Prince Group. Evidence suggests that the massive amount of Bitcoins seized by the U.S. government from Chen Zhi and his Prince Group were actually Bitcoins from the LuBian mining pool that had already been stolen by hackers using technical means back in 2020. In other words, the U.S. government may have already stolen 127,000 Bitcoins held by Chen Zhi through hacking techniques as early as 2020; this is a classic case of a "double-cross" operation orchestrated by a state-sponsored hacking group.PANews reported on November 9th that the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center released a technical analysis report on the LuBian mining pool hack that resulted in the theft of a huge amount of Bitcoin. The report indicated that a major hacking attack occurred at the LuBian mining pool in 2020, resulting in the theft of 127,272.06953176 Bitcoins (worth approximately $3.5 billion at the time, now worth $15 billion). The holder of this huge amount of Bitcoins was identified as Chen Zhi, chairman of the Prince Group of Cambodia. Following the attack, the Bitcoins remained untouched in a wallet address controlled by the attackers for four years, almost entirely untouched. This is clearly inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers eager to cash out and pursue profits, suggesting a precise operation orchestrated by a "nation-state hacking organization." The stolen Bitcoins were only transferred to a new Bitcoin wallet address in June 2024 and have remained untouched ever since. On October 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against Chen Zhi and the seizure of 127,000 Bitcoins from Chen Zhi and his Prince Group. Evidence suggests that the massive amount of Bitcoins seized by the U.S. government from Chen Zhi and his Prince Group were actually Bitcoins from the LuBian mining pool that had already been stolen by hackers using technical means back in 2020. In other words, the U.S. government may have already stolen 127,000 Bitcoins held by Chen Zhi through hacking techniques as early as 2020; this is a classic case of a "double-cross" operation orchestrated by a state-sponsored hacking group.

The National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center released a report on the theft of 127,000 Bitcoins from Chen Zhi nearly five years ago: a state-owned hacker organization was behind the operation

2025/11/09 18:44

PANews reported on November 9th that the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center released a technical analysis report on the LuBian mining pool hack that resulted in the theft of a huge amount of Bitcoin. The report indicated that a major hacking attack occurred at the LuBian mining pool in 2020, resulting in the theft of 127,272.06953176 Bitcoins (worth approximately $3.5 billion at the time, now worth $15 billion). The holder of this huge amount of Bitcoins was identified as Chen Zhi, chairman of the Prince Group of Cambodia. Following the attack, the Bitcoins remained untouched in a wallet address controlled by the attackers for four years, almost entirely untouched. This is clearly inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers eager to cash out and pursue profits, suggesting a precise operation orchestrated by a "nation-state hacking organization." The stolen Bitcoins were only transferred to a new Bitcoin wallet address in June 2024 and have remained untouched ever since.

On October 14, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice announced criminal charges against Chen Zhi and the seizure of 127,000 Bitcoins from Chen Zhi and his Prince Group. Evidence suggests that the massive amount of Bitcoins seized by the U.S. government from Chen Zhi and his Prince Group were actually Bitcoins from the LuBian mining pool that had already been stolen by hackers using technical means back in 2020. In other words, the U.S. government may have already stolen 127,000 Bitcoins held by Chen Zhi through hacking techniques as early as 2020; this is a classic case of a "double-cross" operation orchestrated by a state-sponsored hacking group.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.11164
$0.11164$0.11164
+0.28%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58