Institutional support is shaping the future of stablecoins in real time, and as the stakes rise, only the strongest projects will survive.Institutional support is shaping the future of stablecoins in real time, and as the stakes rise, only the strongest projects will survive.

Shakey ground: When stablecoins aren’t so stable | Opinion

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

There’s no denying stablecoins have exploded this year, and the surge in value, now over $275 billion, is impossible to ignore. But excitement isn’t a substitute for reliability. Despite the noise, the stablecoin landscape is still in the development stage. 

Summary
  • Stablecoins have surged in value, but despite the hype, the market is still early and fragile — only projects with strong fundamentals and real utility will endure.
  • Institutional support is becoming the key differentiator, with banks and payment networks backing stablecoins that offer transparency, reliability, and compliance — setting the stage for mainstream adoption.
  • Consolidation is inevitable: as regulation tightens and competition intensifies, only a few trusted, well-governed stablecoins will survive to become global financial standards while the rest fade away.

Big winners will emerge, while others are destined to fizzle out. There is profit to be made, but only for those who can cut through the hype and spot the real leaders of tomorrow from the future flops.

More than a fad

The crypto space is still dominated by popularity contests and herd mentality. The next ‘big thing’ drives interest and sways community opinion. While this is normal in the crypto landscape, it presents problems around trust. If a project can’t back up its promises with substance, it gets exposed quickly, especially when institutional capital starts asking tough questions.

We don’t need to look far for examples of where stablecoin hype has not delivered. The collapse of TerraUSD (UST) wiped out tens of billions in market value despite becoming the third-largest stablecoin at the time and reaching over $18 billion. While we may never see collapses as large as UST again, the risk of an overhyped but untested stablecoin is still there.

Failures like that are not just a financial hit; they set adoption back and destroy trust. For momentum to keep up, investors and builders need to start caring more about fundamentals than popularity.

Traditional support

No matter how much crypto wants to go it alone, there’s no escaping the influence of traditional finance. Serious institutional support is only going to make stablecoins more relevant. Those who figure out how to connect and collaborate with big institutions are going to shape what comes next and are likely to lead the pack.

We’re already seeing this take shape. J.P. Morgan’s Kinexys is positioned as helping institutional clients settle almost instantly, while McKinsey has highlighted the value that stablecoins hold for the future of payments. The projects building real, resilient infrastructure are getting noticed and backed.

Traditional finance support brings more than just third-party endorsement and a reputation boost. As Brian Brooks stated, institutional stablecoin usage will help build a sense of safety around the asset and further adoption. Those who get on board will become the market’s trusted names, while those staying on the sidelines risk being left in the dust as institutional adoption takes hold. 

The future is consolidation

Consolidation is no longer a possibility; it is inevitable. Institutional support is shaping the future of stablecoins in real time, and as the stakes rise, only the strongest projects will survive. Citi GPS anticipates stablecoins reaching $1.9 trillion by 2030, citing “strong momentum in the ecosystem led by integration by payment networks, new layer-1 blockchains, and regulatory clarity.” As history shows us in rapidly growing spaces, expansion will be followed by a shakeout, and not everyone will make it to the top.

The reality is, only a handful of stablecoins will rise to become banking and institutional standards. The rest will get weeded out by market forces, compliance hurdles, or simple lack of utility. If you can’t deliver real-world value, prove your governance, and show transparent audits, including frequent, public attestations, you won’t earn investor trust, let alone survive the shakeout.

This goes beyond technology or compliance box ticking. Even the most robust, transparent stablecoin will struggle in the wrong environment. You need to be operating in places that encourage digital asset growth. Projects built in markets that foster innovation and regulatory clarity will thrive; those stuck in the wrong place risk withering, regardless of their fundamentals.

The United States is currently paving the way, but it is not the only one. Other regions prioritizing crypto growth, providing clear rules, and opening the doors to sector expansion could just as easily become the prime locations for tomorrow’s breakthrough stablecoins.

There’s no shortage of hype around stablecoins, and that passion is warranted. But only smart, rational decision-making will separate the lasting names from the next wave of failures. For institutions, stablecoins aren’t just another asset; they are the entry ramp into web3 itself. Success will come to those who align with future leaders, projects with true market fit, strong frameworks, and ecosystems built for growth. Pick wisely now, and that’s where the real value, use cases, and trust will be found as this industry matures.

Kyle Klemmer

Kyle Klemmer is the co-founder of Blockstreet, where he bridges Wall Street with web3 innovation to drive institutional and developer adoption of USD1. A strategic operator and advisor in digital assets, he focuses on building responsible frameworks that connect traditional finance with decentralized markets.

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.008524
$0.008524$0.008524
-0.72%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Craft Ventures Opens Austin Office

Craft Ventures Opens Austin Office

AUSTIN, Texas–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Craft Ventures, the venture capital firm co-founded in 2017 by David Sacks and Bill Lee, has opened a new office in Austin, Texas,
Share
AI Journal2026/01/01 08:00
Paxos launches new startup to help institutions offer DeFi products

Paxos launches new startup to help institutions offer DeFi products

PANews reported on June 19 that according to The Block, the stablecoin issuer Paxos launched a new startup Paxos Labs, which aims to help institutions integrate DeFi and on-chain products
Share
PANews2025/06/19 00:04