The post Significant Difference Between Bitcoin Investors and Ethereum Investors Emerged This Week – Here’s What It Is appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new report from blockchain analysis firm Glassnode has revealed that Ethereum investors are less willing to hold onto their coins than Bitcoin holders. While BTC is still held by the crypto market’s “real diamond hands” thanks to its low volatility, ETH is moved and spent at a much higher rate, according to the report. Glassnode stated that it made these findings using data collected before the cryptocurrency crash earlier this week. The company argued that Bitcoin acts as a “digital savings asset” while Ethereum, due to its broad range of uses, qualifies as “digital oil.” The report claimed that BTC is significantly less mobile and is being held by investors for long-term safekeeping: “Bitcoin is behaving as a digital savings asset, as designed; coins are widely hoarded, turnover is low, and supply is increasingly directed to long-term storage rather than exchanges.” On the Ethereum side, the picture is quite different. ETH is much more actively used due to smart contracts, DeFi protocols, tokenization, and gas fees: “Ethereum’s behavior reflects its nature as a smart contract platform with high transaction volume. There’s a large base of native staking, and the investor component has been further strengthened by the introduction of ETFs.” Glassnode noted that smart contracts, in particular, have significantly increased ETH usage. ETH is spent as gas fees across a wide range of use cases, from DeFi transactions to stablecoin transfers to decentralized exchange token swaps. One of the report’s notable findings was the long-term coin movement. According to the data: “Long-term ETH holders are mobilizing their coins 3x faster than BTC holders.” Although ETH is not as passive an asset as Bitcoin, Glassnode noted that the store of value aspect of Ethereum should not be completely ignored: “One in four ETH in circulation is locked in native staking… The post Significant Difference Between Bitcoin Investors and Ethereum Investors Emerged This Week – Here’s What It Is appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new report from blockchain analysis firm Glassnode has revealed that Ethereum investors are less willing to hold onto their coins than Bitcoin holders. While BTC is still held by the crypto market’s “real diamond hands” thanks to its low volatility, ETH is moved and spent at a much higher rate, according to the report. Glassnode stated that it made these findings using data collected before the cryptocurrency crash earlier this week. The company argued that Bitcoin acts as a “digital savings asset” while Ethereum, due to its broad range of uses, qualifies as “digital oil.” The report claimed that BTC is significantly less mobile and is being held by investors for long-term safekeeping: “Bitcoin is behaving as a digital savings asset, as designed; coins are widely hoarded, turnover is low, and supply is increasingly directed to long-term storage rather than exchanges.” On the Ethereum side, the picture is quite different. ETH is much more actively used due to smart contracts, DeFi protocols, tokenization, and gas fees: “Ethereum’s behavior reflects its nature as a smart contract platform with high transaction volume. There’s a large base of native staking, and the investor component has been further strengthened by the introduction of ETFs.” Glassnode noted that smart contracts, in particular, have significantly increased ETH usage. ETH is spent as gas fees across a wide range of use cases, from DeFi transactions to stablecoin transfers to decentralized exchange token swaps. One of the report’s notable findings was the long-term coin movement. According to the data: “Long-term ETH holders are mobilizing their coins 3x faster than BTC holders.” Although ETH is not as passive an asset as Bitcoin, Glassnode noted that the store of value aspect of Ethereum should not be completely ignored: “One in four ETH in circulation is locked in native staking…

Significant Difference Between Bitcoin Investors and Ethereum Investors Emerged This Week – Here’s What It Is

A new report from blockchain analysis firm Glassnode has revealed that Ethereum investors are less willing to hold onto their coins than Bitcoin holders.

While BTC is still held by the crypto market’s “real diamond hands” thanks to its low volatility, ETH is moved and spent at a much higher rate, according to the report.

Glassnode stated that it made these findings using data collected before the cryptocurrency crash earlier this week. The company argued that Bitcoin acts as a “digital savings asset” while Ethereum, due to its broad range of uses, qualifies as “digital oil.”

The report claimed that BTC is significantly less mobile and is being held by investors for long-term safekeeping:

On the Ethereum side, the picture is quite different. ETH is much more actively used due to smart contracts, DeFi protocols, tokenization, and gas fees:

Glassnode noted that smart contracts, in particular, have significantly increased ETH usage. ETH is spent as gas fees across a wide range of use cases, from DeFi transactions to stablecoin transfers to decentralized exchange token swaps.

One of the report’s notable findings was the long-term coin movement. According to the data:

Although ETH is not as passive an asset as Bitcoin, Glassnode noted that the store of value aspect of Ethereum should not be completely ignored:

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/significant-difference-between-bitcoin-investors-and-ethereum-investors-emerged-this-week-heres-what-it-is/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$89,424.67
$89,424.67$89,424.67
+0.44%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
ZKP Crypto Presale Auction: 8,000x Returns Slipping Away with Each Burned Coin

ZKP Crypto Presale Auction: 8,000x Returns Slipping Away with Each Burned Coin

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) operates a 450-day crypto ICO, burning unsold coins each day. Supply drops through phases, plus a strong deflationary design might create
Share
coinlineup2026/01/23 01:00