The post Significant Difference Between Bitcoin Investors and Ethereum Investors Emerged This Week – Here’s What It Is appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new report from blockchain analysis firm Glassnode has revealed that Ethereum investors are less willing to hold onto their coins than Bitcoin holders. While BTC is still held by the crypto market’s “real diamond hands” thanks to its low volatility, ETH is moved and spent at a much higher rate, according to the report. Glassnode stated that it made these findings using data collected before the cryptocurrency crash earlier this week. The company argued that Bitcoin acts as a “digital savings asset” while Ethereum, due to its broad range of uses, qualifies as “digital oil.” The report claimed that BTC is significantly less mobile and is being held by investors for long-term safekeeping: “Bitcoin is behaving as a digital savings asset, as designed; coins are widely hoarded, turnover is low, and supply is increasingly directed to long-term storage rather than exchanges.” On the Ethereum side, the picture is quite different. ETH is much more actively used due to smart contracts, DeFi protocols, tokenization, and gas fees: “Ethereum’s behavior reflects its nature as a smart contract platform with high transaction volume. There’s a large base of native staking, and the investor component has been further strengthened by the introduction of ETFs.” Glassnode noted that smart contracts, in particular, have significantly increased ETH usage. ETH is spent as gas fees across a wide range of use cases, from DeFi transactions to stablecoin transfers to decentralized exchange token swaps. One of the report’s notable findings was the long-term coin movement. According to the data: “Long-term ETH holders are mobilizing their coins 3x faster than BTC holders.” Although ETH is not as passive an asset as Bitcoin, Glassnode noted that the store of value aspect of Ethereum should not be completely ignored: “One in four ETH in circulation is locked in native staking… The post Significant Difference Between Bitcoin Investors and Ethereum Investors Emerged This Week – Here’s What It Is appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A new report from blockchain analysis firm Glassnode has revealed that Ethereum investors are less willing to hold onto their coins than Bitcoin holders. While BTC is still held by the crypto market’s “real diamond hands” thanks to its low volatility, ETH is moved and spent at a much higher rate, according to the report. Glassnode stated that it made these findings using data collected before the cryptocurrency crash earlier this week. The company argued that Bitcoin acts as a “digital savings asset” while Ethereum, due to its broad range of uses, qualifies as “digital oil.” The report claimed that BTC is significantly less mobile and is being held by investors for long-term safekeeping: “Bitcoin is behaving as a digital savings asset, as designed; coins are widely hoarded, turnover is low, and supply is increasingly directed to long-term storage rather than exchanges.” On the Ethereum side, the picture is quite different. ETH is much more actively used due to smart contracts, DeFi protocols, tokenization, and gas fees: “Ethereum’s behavior reflects its nature as a smart contract platform with high transaction volume. There’s a large base of native staking, and the investor component has been further strengthened by the introduction of ETFs.” Glassnode noted that smart contracts, in particular, have significantly increased ETH usage. ETH is spent as gas fees across a wide range of use cases, from DeFi transactions to stablecoin transfers to decentralized exchange token swaps. One of the report’s notable findings was the long-term coin movement. According to the data: “Long-term ETH holders are mobilizing their coins 3x faster than BTC holders.” Although ETH is not as passive an asset as Bitcoin, Glassnode noted that the store of value aspect of Ethereum should not be completely ignored: “One in four ETH in circulation is locked in native staking…

Significant Difference Between Bitcoin Investors and Ethereum Investors Emerged This Week – Here’s What It Is

2025/11/17 00:17

A new report from blockchain analysis firm Glassnode has revealed that Ethereum investors are less willing to hold onto their coins than Bitcoin holders.

While BTC is still held by the crypto market’s “real diamond hands” thanks to its low volatility, ETH is moved and spent at a much higher rate, according to the report.

Glassnode stated that it made these findings using data collected before the cryptocurrency crash earlier this week. The company argued that Bitcoin acts as a “digital savings asset” while Ethereum, due to its broad range of uses, qualifies as “digital oil.”

The report claimed that BTC is significantly less mobile and is being held by investors for long-term safekeeping:

On the Ethereum side, the picture is quite different. ETH is much more actively used due to smart contracts, DeFi protocols, tokenization, and gas fees:

Glassnode noted that smart contracts, in particular, have significantly increased ETH usage. ETH is spent as gas fees across a wide range of use cases, from DeFi transactions to stablecoin transfers to decentralized exchange token swaps.

One of the report’s notable findings was the long-term coin movement. According to the data:

Although ETH is not as passive an asset as Bitcoin, Glassnode noted that the store of value aspect of Ethereum should not be completely ignored:

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/significant-difference-between-bitcoin-investors-and-ethereum-investors-emerged-this-week-heres-what-it-is/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26