TLDRs; A White House memo alleges Alibaba supports China’s military with data access and technical capabilities. Alibaba denies all claims, insisting it has no links to military or state surveillance operations. Allegations come amid broader U.S. efforts to scrutinize Chinese tech companies for national security risks. Any formal DoD designation could spark future restrictions and [...] The post White House Memo Accuses Alibaba of Aiding PLA, Company Calls Claims “Nonsense” appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; A White House memo alleges Alibaba supports China’s military with data access and technical capabilities. Alibaba denies all claims, insisting it has no links to military or state surveillance operations. Allegations come amid broader U.S. efforts to scrutinize Chinese tech companies for national security risks. Any formal DoD designation could spark future restrictions and [...] The post White House Memo Accuses Alibaba of Aiding PLA, Company Calls Claims “Nonsense” appeared first on CoinCentral.

White House Memo Accuses Alibaba of Aiding PLA, Company Calls Claims “Nonsense”

2025/11/17 01:29

TLDRs;

  • A White House memo alleges Alibaba supports China’s military with data access and technical capabilities.
  • Alibaba denies all claims, insisting it has no links to military or state surveillance operations.
  • Allegations come amid broader U.S. efforts to scrutinize Chinese tech companies for national security risks.
  • Any formal DoD designation could spark future restrictions and cloud concerns for Alibaba’s global clients.

A newly surfaced White House national security memo has ignited another round of geopolitical friction between Washington and Beijing after alleging that Alibaba Group is providing technical support to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

The document, shared with the Financial Times, claims the Chinese tech conglomerate enabled military-related operations targeting U.S. interests. Alibaba, however, has categorically denied every allegation, labeling the memo’s assertions as “complete nonsense.”

The memo alleges that Alibaba granted Chinese state actors access to sensitive customer information, including device IP addresses, Wi-Fi details, payment records, and AI-related services. It also claims that certain employees shared internal knowledge of undisclosed software vulnerabilities that could be exploited for surveillance or cyber-operations. These assertions have not been independently verified, leaving the report’s factual basis in question but fueling broader debates over data governance and national security risks in the U.S.–China tech rivalry.

US Memo Sparks Fresh Tensions

The timing of the memo adds even more weight to its claims. It arrives as U.S. lawmakers intensify scrutiny of Chinese technology companies and push for tougher restrictions on their access to American markets. Several members of Congress have been urging the Biden administration to more aggressively monitor foreign tech firms they believe could have military or intelligence affiliations.

While the memo itself does not impose restrictions, its implications are significant. Analysts note that the key question now is whether the Department of Defense (DoD) will formally place Alibaba under Section 1260H, a designation applied to companies alleged to support China’s military modernization efforts.

Such a listing would not immediately ban U.S. firms from doing business with Alibaba, but it would carry symbolic weight, positioning the e-commerce and cloud giant under the same umbrella as other firms Washington views as potential national security risks.

Alibaba Strongly Rejects Accusations

Alibaba responded swiftly and forcefully to the memo. In a written statement, the company dismissed the allegations as unfounded and “completely detached from reality.”

The tech giant emphasized that it operates independently and adheres to international compliance standards, including data protection and cross-border security frameworks.

The company also criticized what it described as politically motivated attempts to conflate commercial cloud services with military activity, an accusation it has faced several times over the past decade as U.S.–China relations have deteriorated.

Security Concerns Shape Tech Policy

The memo arrives at a sensitive moment, following a recently negotiated U.S.–China agreement to pause new trade restrictions for one year. Despite the temporary truce, Washington has indicated it will continue to examine Chinese tech providers for risks related to data privacy, surveillance capabilities, and supply-chain dependencies.

Experts say the real impact of the memo will hinge on how multiple U.S. agencies respond. The Treasury Department could choose to place Alibaba on its Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex (NS-CMIC) list, which limits U.S. investments. The Commerce Department could go further by adding Alibaba or its subsidiaries to the Entity List, restricting American companies from exporting hardware or software to the firm.

Past cases show designations are not guaranteed. Chinese lidar developer Hesai Technology successfully challenged its DoD classification in court. Drone giant DJI is currently fighting its own listing.

The post White House Memo Accuses Alibaba of Aiding PLA, Company Calls Claims “Nonsense” appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Can Bulls Defend the $2 Mark?

Can Bulls Defend the $2 Mark?

The post Can Bulls Defend the $2 Mark? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market is holding its breath as the Federal Reserve is widely expected to announce another rate cut next week. With an 86% probability of a 25-basis-point reduction, the move signals a shift in monetary policy—one that could ripple through traditional and digital markets alike. For XRP price, this decision comes at a critical juncture. The token is consolidating near the $2 mark, showing early signs of compression that could lead to a decisive breakout or breakdown. How the Fed’s Decision Could Influence XRP Price Prediction When the Fed lowers interest rates, liquidity usually flows toward higher-risk assets like cryptocurrencies. Investors see reduced borrowing costs as a green light to move capital away from bonds and into speculative sectors. In the short term, this could boost demand across the crypto market, especially for large-cap coins like XRP that have historically tracked broad market sentiment. However, this policy shift isn’t without risk. If the rate cut sparks fears of inflation, the dollar might weaken temporarily, boosting crypto prices, but an overheated market could later face correction once inflation pressures resurface. In essence, XRP’s near-term rally potential depends not only on the cut itself but on how investors interpret the Fed’s broader tone—whether it signals a short-term stimulus or a sustained dovish stance. Technical Analysis: XRP Price Faces a Tight Squeeze XRP/USD Daily chart- TradingView The XRP price daily chart shows price holding just above the $2.04 zone, hugging the lower Bollinger Band range. The bands have tightened, signaling a phase of volatility contraction. Historically, such setups precede large directional moves. The middle band (SMA 20) around $2.11 acts as immediate resistance, while the upper band near $2.28 defines the ceiling for bullish expansion. The Heikin Ashi candles show mild indecision—smaller bodies and wicks on both sides—hinting at market hesitation. A…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 13:43