Model Context Protocol (MCP) lets AI discover and use new tools on the fly. Each MCP server becomes a domain-specific intelligence hub that can serve multiple agents while maintaining its own security and business logic.Model Context Protocol (MCP) lets AI discover and use new tools on the fly. Each MCP server becomes a domain-specific intelligence hub that can serve multiple agents while maintaining its own security and business logic.

Building User-Aware AI Agents with MCP and Serverless

\ Something very interesting happens when you combine AI agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and serverless computing. We're not just talking about the smarter chatbots that can hit a few APIs; we're building AI systems that can actually understand who you are, what you're allowed to do, and can work across different company systems without breaking security rules or stepping on other users' toes.

The Authentication Challenge in AI Systems

Traditional AI applications face a fundamental problem: how do you maintain user context and permissions when an AI agent needs to access multiple services on behalf of different users? Most implementations either sacrifice security (by using shared credentials) or user experience (by requiring constant re-authentication).

The solution lies in a sophisticated JWT propagation pattern that maintains user identity throughout the entire request chain:

\ This creates a secure chain of trust where user identity is never inferred from AI responses but always cryptographically verified.

MCP: The Missing Link for AI Tool Integration

Think of MCP as breaking AI out of its cage. Instead of building one massive AI app that tries to do everything, you can now create smaller, specialized AI services that talk to each other. Rather than hardcoding every possible tool an AI might need, MCP lets your AI discover and use new tools on the fly, even if those tools live on completely different servers.

The key insight is treating tools as microservices rather than embedded functions. Each MCP server becomes a domain-specific intelligence hub that can serve multiple agents while maintaining its own security and business logic.

\

// MCP tools become user-aware automatically export async function getTravelPolicies(userId, userRole) { // Policy enforcement happens at the tool level return policies.filter(p => p.appliesToRole(userRole)); }

\

Serverless: The Perfect Runtime for AI Agents

Serverless computing solves three critical challenges for AI agents:

1. Stateless by Design: Each invocation starts fresh, eliminating state pollution between users and requests.

2. Automatic Scaling: Handle concurrent users without capacity planning—essential when AI agents might trigger complex tool chains.

3. Cost Efficiency: Pay only for actual inference and tool execution time, not idle capacity.

The architecture becomes elegantly simple:

  • API Gateway handles routing and initial authentication
  • Lambda functions provide isolated execution contexts
  • S3 manages session state externally
  • Each user gets their own logical agent instance

The Session State Revolution

Traditional web applications maintain session state in memory or databases. AI agents require a different approach because their "state" includes conversation history, tool results, and learned context—potentially gigabytes of data.

Externalizing this to S3 with the Strands SDK creates fascinating possibilities:

# Agent state becomes portable and analyzable session_manager = S3SessionManager( bucket="agent-sessions", key_prefix=f"user/{user_id}/conversations/" ) # State can be shared, analyzed, or migrated agent = StrandsAgent.from_session(session_manager)

This enables features like conversation handoffs between agents, audit trails, and even AI-to-AI collaboration patterns.

Real-World Implementation Insights

Building the travel agent example revealed several non-obvious patterns:

Tool Composition: MCP servers can call other MCP servers, creating tool hierarchies. A booking tool might call policy tools, pricing tools, and availability tools in sequence.

Failure Isolation: When one MCP server fails, others continue working. The agent gracefully degrades functionality rather than failing.

Dynamic Authorization: User permissions can change mid-conversation. The JWT refresh pattern ensures tools always operate with current permissions.

The Broader Implications

This architecture pattern extends far beyond travel booking. Consider:

  • Enterprise AI: Agents that can access HR systems, financial data, and project management tools while respecting organizational hierarchies
  • Healthcare AI: Agents with patient-specific access to medical records, treatment protocols, and scheduling systems
  • Financial Services: Agents that can execute trades, check balances, and generate reports within strict compliance boundaries

Looking Forward

The combination of MCP and serverless is enabling a new class of AI applications that are:

  • Truly multi-tenant at the infrastructure level
  • Composable across organizational boundaries
  • Secure by default through cryptographic identity propagation
  • Infinitely scalable through serverless execution

We're moving from "AI that can use tools" to "AI that can orchestrate distributed business processes while maintaining perfect security and user context."

The future isn't just smarter chatbots; it's intelligent systems that can safely operate across the full spectrum of enterprise applications, with each user getting their own personalized, secure, and contextually aware AI assistant.

\

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

The post ‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline “Sinners” shattered a 75-year-old record
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:34
‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

The post ‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Return to Silent Hil Return to Silent Hil
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:19