Travis Hill has advanced toward becoming the permanent FDIC chair after a narrow vote by the Senate Banking Committee.Travis Hill has advanced toward becoming the permanent FDIC chair after a narrow vote by the Senate Banking Committee.

Senate Banking Committee approves Travis Hill’s FDIC nomination 13‑11, sending it to the full Senate

The nomination of Travis Hill to lead the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) moved forward as the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs voted 13-11 along party lines to advance his confirmation to the full Senate.

Hill currently holds the role of acting chairman of the agency, and his elevation comes amid significant policy changes and an internal reassessment at the FDIC. He needs a vote by the full Senate to be confirmed in the position.

To Republicans, he is an advocate for a regulator who will update bank oversight and allow new financial technologies to flourish. For Democrats, he would raise questions about eroding safeguards that protect depositors and financial stability.

Hill is leading the shift in crypto policies

The acting FDIC chair is most widely regarded as one of today’s most pro-crypto financial regulators in the federal government. And he has steered the FDIC over the past year to be more favorable toward digital assets on the basis that U.S. banks should have the opportunity to innovate without too many barriers. 

Under Hill’s leadership, the FDIC has begun rolling back prior guidance that discouraged banks from engaging in crypto-related activities unless they received special approval.

Hill has repeatedly argued that “reputational risk” should not be used as a primary regulatory tool, calling it vague and overly broad. In his view, reputational risk is too subjective to apply fairly across institutions. Instead, he says banks should be evaluated on how they manage actual financial, operational, and compliance risks — not on speculative concerns about public perception.

Some in the digital assets industry have hailed such a shift, arguing that they have been excluded from critical banking services. Hill’s stance indicates a more permissive FDIC, one that’s willing to allow trial and error on blockchain, custody services, and reasonable crypto channeling.

He has also led a transparency push and issued internal supervisory documents that demonstrate how regulators approached banks that worked with crypto firms. In that case, Hill argues, openness improves trust — and provides institutions with clarity in expectation.  

Lawmakers press Hill on oversight and culture

While Hill enjoys strong Republican support, his nomination has been a subject of great controversy. Senators have pointed out unresolved cultural and structural issues within the FDIC that have revealed years of harassment, bullying, and unsafe workplace practices, after an independent investigation reported on the matter. 

At confirmation hearings, Hill faced harsh questions about how he’s solving these problems, what he is doing about them, and what reforms have been implemented since the scandal was brought to light through difficult conversations. There was considerable frustration among several lawmakers who were confused by the delays in receiving updates from Hill and some members of Congress. 

One senator publicly warned Hill that a vote for him was contingent upon full transparency. Hill has maintained that he is committed to repairing the FDIC’s culture, holding the agency accountable, and instilling trust in FDIC staff. More broadly, he has proposed modernizing supervision, simplifying regulatory procedures, and enhancing the FDIC’s capacity to manage troubled banks. 

The same goes for regional bankers who have rallied behind him, saying they feel he can address their needs and that a more balanced regulatory approach, one that does not impose unnecessary burdens, will avoid further problems. 

With committee approval now in place, Hill’s nomination is in the full Senate. If confirmed, he would reshape the FDIC’s approach to innovation and risk-taking, as well as the relationship between banks and the cryptocurrency economy. His reign would likely be one of the sharpest new directions the FDIC has taken in years — one that will expand opportunities for digital-asset companies while also testing how regulators can balance innovation and stability.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Sui Ecosystem Gains Spotlight as Taipei Builders Demo Day Highlights New DeFi Ideas

Sui Ecosystem Gains Spotlight as Taipei Builders Demo Day Highlights New DeFi Ideas

Sui Taipei Builders’ Demo Day brings developers, investors, and enthusiasts together to present blockchain projects. The Sui ecosystem will host the Taipei Builders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/03 00:00
Stability World AI Makes AI Accessible and Ownable for People

Stability World AI Makes AI Accessible and Ownable for People

Stability World AI blends AI agents with blockchain incentives to promoting trust, accessibility, shared ownership of AI through user-driven governance.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/03 00:00