The post Strategy risks bloodbath if major index ditches it: JPMorgan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Analysts at JPMorgan warn that more than 20% of Strategy’s market cap sits in passive indices, which are now threatening to delist it. Summary Michael Saylor’s Strategy could lose $2.8 billion if MSCI removes it from its passive indices The Bitcoin treasury firm could lose a further $8.8 billion out of its $50 billion market cap if others follow MSCI is currently considering a proposal to exclude crypto treasury firms from its benchmark indices Michael Salyor’s Bitcoin buying machine could face a reckoning that could wipe out more than 20% of its total market cap. On Wednesday, November 19, analysts at JPMorgan warned of the impending decision that could exclude Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from MSCI’s passive funds. Strategy risks losing $2.8 billion if MSCI, a major index provider, excludes it from its benchmarks, including the MSCI USA and MSCI World. The largest Bitcoin (BTC) treasury firm could lose a further $8.8 billion if other indices, warns JPMorgan analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou. These fears came after MSCI revealed last month that it is consulting on a move to exclude crypto treasury firms from its indices. The rule would apply to companies for whom crypto represents 50% or more of their total assets. The decision will be announced on January 15, 2026. Why Strategy needs indices Instead of picking stocks directly, many retail and institutional investors choose to invest in passive benchmark indices. These indices enable investors to pick stocks based on geography and market cap, while diversifying their risk. For this reason, inclusion in these indices is highly beneficial. Namely, it brings capital without any individual investor having to buy their stocks actively. Conversely, excluding an index could be catastrophic, especially for large companies. In addition to the MSCI indices, Strategy is also included in the Nasdaq 100 and the S&P 600.… The post Strategy risks bloodbath if major index ditches it: JPMorgan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Analysts at JPMorgan warn that more than 20% of Strategy’s market cap sits in passive indices, which are now threatening to delist it. Summary Michael Saylor’s Strategy could lose $2.8 billion if MSCI removes it from its passive indices The Bitcoin treasury firm could lose a further $8.8 billion out of its $50 billion market cap if others follow MSCI is currently considering a proposal to exclude crypto treasury firms from its benchmark indices Michael Salyor’s Bitcoin buying machine could face a reckoning that could wipe out more than 20% of its total market cap. On Wednesday, November 19, analysts at JPMorgan warned of the impending decision that could exclude Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from MSCI’s passive funds. Strategy risks losing $2.8 billion if MSCI, a major index provider, excludes it from its benchmarks, including the MSCI USA and MSCI World. The largest Bitcoin (BTC) treasury firm could lose a further $8.8 billion if other indices, warns JPMorgan analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou. These fears came after MSCI revealed last month that it is consulting on a move to exclude crypto treasury firms from its indices. The rule would apply to companies for whom crypto represents 50% or more of their total assets. The decision will be announced on January 15, 2026. Why Strategy needs indices Instead of picking stocks directly, many retail and institutional investors choose to invest in passive benchmark indices. These indices enable investors to pick stocks based on geography and market cap, while diversifying their risk. For this reason, inclusion in these indices is highly beneficial. Namely, it brings capital without any individual investor having to buy their stocks actively. Conversely, excluding an index could be catastrophic, especially for large companies. In addition to the MSCI indices, Strategy is also included in the Nasdaq 100 and the S&P 600.…

Strategy risks bloodbath if major index ditches it: JPMorgan

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Analysts at JPMorgan warn that more than 20% of Strategy’s market cap sits in passive indices, which are now threatening to delist it.

Summary

  • Michael Saylor’s Strategy could lose $2.8 billion if MSCI removes it from its passive indices
  • The Bitcoin treasury firm could lose a further $8.8 billion out of its $50 billion market cap if others follow
  • MSCI is currently considering a proposal to exclude crypto treasury firms from its benchmark indices

Michael Salyor’s Bitcoin buying machine could face a reckoning that could wipe out more than 20% of its total market cap. On Wednesday, November 19, analysts at JPMorgan warned of the impending decision that could exclude Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from MSCI’s passive funds.

Strategy risks losing $2.8 billion if MSCI, a major index provider, excludes it from its benchmarks, including the MSCI USA and MSCI World. The largest Bitcoin (BTC) treasury firm could lose a further $8.8 billion if other indices, warns JPMorgan analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou.

These fears came after MSCI revealed last month that it is consulting on a move to exclude crypto treasury firms from its indices. The rule would apply to companies for whom crypto represents 50% or more of their total assets. The decision will be announced on January 15, 2026.

Why Strategy needs indices

Instead of picking stocks directly, many retail and institutional investors choose to invest in passive benchmark indices. These indices enable investors to pick stocks based on geography and market cap, while diversifying their risk.

For this reason, inclusion in these indices is highly beneficial. Namely, it brings capital without any individual investor having to buy their stocks actively. Conversely, excluding an index could be catastrophic, especially for large companies.

In addition to the MSCI indices, Strategy is also included in the Nasdaq 100 and the S&P 600. Despite previous attempts and having met the technical requirements, Strategy was not included in the S&P 500, the most popular benchmark index.

What Saylor says…

Saylor isn’t losing sleep over what his critics say or Bitcoin’s volatility. Bitcoin, he argues, has actually been declining for years, falling from around 80% in 2020 to roughly 50% today.

Eventually, he expects BTC will settle at about 1.5 times the volatility of the S&P 500 — while also outperforming it.

Despite BTC sliding nearly 11% this past week to around $91,700, Saylor told Fox Business that it was business as usual.

Volatility, he said, flushes out weak hands: “The company is engineered to take an 80% to 90% drawdown and keep on ticking… I think we’re pretty indestructible.”

Meanwhile, MicroStrategy keeps stacking. The firm now holds 649,870 BTC (about $59.5 billion), and Saylor said its balance sheet is solid even though the stock has cooled off, dipping to a one-year low before rebounding slightly.

He also shot down rumors that the company had sold any Bitcoin, quipping on X that MicroStrategy had actually been buying every day between Nov. 10–16 — and then revealing a fresh purchase of 8,178 BTC worth $835 million. With an average cost basis of $74,443, the company remains comfortably in the green.

Institutional interest isn’t slowing, either: Canada’s CPP pension fund recently disclosed an $80 million stake in MicroStrategy, while Florida’s pension fund reported a $47 million position. Saylor’s message, essentially: Bitcoin is fine, MicroStrategy is fine, and if anyone’s panicking, it definitely isn’t him.

Source: https://crypto.news/strategy-risks-bloodbath-if-major-index-ditches-it-jpmorgan/

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.06244
$0.06244$0.06244
+0.53%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x

Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x

Traders hunting the best crypto to buy now and the best crypto investment in 2025 keep watching doge, yet today’s […] The post Dogecoin Price Prediction For 2025, As Analysts Call Pepeto The Next 100x appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 00:39
Vistra (VST) Stock Drops 7% as Insider Sales Spook the Market

Vistra (VST) Stock Drops 7% as Insider Sales Spook the Market

TLDR Vistra (VST) stock fell as much as 7.16% as investors reacted to heavy insider selling by the CEO and top executives filed with the SEC. The stock also hit
Share
Coincentral2026/03/21 01:25