MiCA Accelerates Europe Stablecoins As 17 EMT Issuers Span 10 Countries, With Euro- and Dollar-Backed Tokens Expanding Cross-Border Payments.MiCA Accelerates Europe Stablecoins As 17 EMT Issuers Span 10 Countries, With Euro- and Dollar-Backed Tokens Expanding Cross-Border Payments.

Europe stablecoins under MiCA grow as 17 licensed issuers emerge

europe stablecoins

Europe’s regulated stablecoin ecosystem is expanding under MiCA, with new issuers and compliant digital money gaining traction across the region.

How are licensed stablecoin issuers expanding across Europe?

The core of the EU’s MiCA framework is clear: it sets strict rules for stablecoins in Europe, legally defined as electronic money tokens, or EMTs. These are digital coins backed 1:1 by a single fiat currency, such as euros or dollars. Because the regime is demanding, only authorised firms can issue them across the bloc.

Today, the EU lists 17 authorised EMT issuers operating from 10 different countries. France leads with three regulated issuers, reflecting its proactive stance on European digital money. Moreover, Germany, Finland, Denmark, the Czech Republic and Poland each host one issuer, while Malta, the Netherlands, Lithuania and Luxembourg have two each, highlighting a broad geographic spread.

These licensed EMT issuers currently offer 25 approved EMTs backed by single fiat currencies. 14 are tied to the euro, with nine linked to the US dollar. However, the remaining two EMTs diversify exposure, with one backed by the Czech koruna and another pegged to the British pound. This mix shows strong demand for simple, transparent digital money that can move at internet speed across the EU’s internal market.

What does MiCA mean for euro and dollar stablecoin issuers?

The rise of euro backed stablecoins and regulated dollar products shows how traditional finance is embracing tokenized money. Many established financial institutions are no longer staying on the sidelines. Instead, they are entering the market through fully regulated channels aligned with MiCA. That said, this shift is also reshaping how cross-border liquidity and payments are handled within the bloc.

A prominent real-world example is Circle, which now issues the EU’s largest regulated euro and dollar stablecoins. Businesses across Europe use these tokens for faster payments, onchain settlement and cross border payments in global commerce. Moreover, this activity demonstrates how compliant stable-value tokens are moving from niche crypto tools into core infrastructure for mainstream finance.

Circle’s products also sit within a wider competitive field where exchanges and fintechs explore MiCA-compliant models. Market watchers are closely monitoring how any future Binance stablecoins Europe strategy might adapt to the new rulebook. However, MiCA’s licensing, governance and reserve rules set a high bar that all potential issuers must meet before operating at scale in the single market.

Why are asset referenced tokens still missing under MiCA?

One striking gap in the current landscape is the total absence of authorised asset referenced tokens, which MiCA treats as a separate category alongside EMTs. These instruments would be backed by baskets of currencies or other assets such as gold, rather than a single fiat unit. Yet, despite occupying a large share of the law’s text, they have not appeared in the EU market so far.

This lack of activity may stem from higher compliance costs and complex supervision. MiCA imposes more demanding obligations on issuers of multi-asset tokens, which could deter early movers. Moreover, industry demand has clearly favoured single-currency stablecoins so far, as they are easier for users to understand, integrate and trust in daily transactions.

For now, this means that the MiCA era is being shaped mainly by one-currency EMTs, particularly euro and dollar products. However, as the framework matures and companies gain experience with supervision, there may be room for more innovative structures. A future MiCA regulatory update or market shift could eventually encourage diversified reference baskets or commodity-backed instruments.

How mature is the MiCA stablecoin landscape today?

Almost 1.5 years after the EU began enforcing MiCA rules for stablecoins, the region has built one of the world’s most structured and transparent digital money regimes. The combination of 17 licensed issuers and 25 authorised EMTs underscores how quickly the framework is taking hold. Moreover, the spread across 10 countries shows that MiCA is not limited to one or two financial hubs.

Regulated operators are scaling their presence across the continent, and new compliant currencies continue to join the market. Confidence in Europe stablecoins is rising as businesses and institutions test them in real payment flows and settlement processes. However, the next phase of growth will depend on how effectively issuers can balance innovation with strict risk, reserve and disclosure requirements.

In summary, MiCA has accelerated the transition from speculative crypto experiments toward regulated digital cash instruments embedded in everyday finance. The absence of asset-referenced structures highlights the market’s current preference for simplicity, but the legal groundwork is already in place. As adoption deepens, Europe’s approach could become a global reference model for supervised, tokenized money.

Market Opportunity
CROSS Logo
CROSS Price(CROSS)
$0.13921
$0.13921$0.13921
+2.82%
USD
CROSS (CROSS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

The post How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This article is a sponsored
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 09:02
NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack

NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack

The post NGP Token Crashes 88% After $2M Oracle Hack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes The attacker stole ~$2 million worth of ETH from the New Gold Protocol on Sept.18. The exploit involved a flash loan that successfully manipulated the price oracle enabling the attacker to bypass security checks in the smart contract. The NGP token is down 88% as the attacker obfuscates their funds through Tornado Cash. New Gold Protocol, a DeFi staking project, lost around 443.8 Ethereum ETH $4 599 24h volatility: 2.2% Market cap: $555.19 B Vol. 24h: $42.83 B , valued at $2 million, in an exploit on Sept 18. The attack caused the project’s native NGP token to crash by 88%, wiping out most of its market value in less than an hour. The incident was flagged by multiple blockchain security firms, including PeckShield and Blockaid. Both firms confirmed the amount stolen and tracked the movement of the funds. Blockaid’s analysis identified the specific vulnerability that the attacker used. 🚨 Community Alert: Blockaid’s exploit detection system identified multiple malicious transactions targeting the NGP token on BSC. Roughly $2M has been drained. ↓ We’re monitoring in real time and will share updates below pic.twitter.com/efxXma0REQ — Blockaid (@blockaid_) September 17, 2025 Flash Loan Attack Manipulated Price Oracle According to the Blockaid report, the hack was a price oracle manipulation attack. The protocol’s smart contract had a critical flaw; it determined the NGP token’s price by looking at the asset reserves in a single Uniswap liquidity pool. This method is insecure because a single pool’s price can be easily manipulated. The attacker used a flash loan to borrow a large amount of assets. A flash loan consists of a series of transactions that borrow and return a loan within the same transaction. They used these assets to temporarily skew the reserves in the liquidity pool, tricking the protocol into thinking the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 19:04
Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

The post Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Since it touched a high of $4.5, Lighter has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 08:46