TLDR MSCI is consulting on whether Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana treasury companies should be classified as funds rather than businesses. Michael Saylor responded by emphasizing that his company operates as a traditional business, not a fund or trust. The MSCI’s potential reclassification could result in companies holding large crypto reserves being removed from major equity [...] The post MSCI Considers Reclassifying Bitcoin Treasury Firms as Funds appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR MSCI is consulting on whether Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana treasury companies should be classified as funds rather than businesses. Michael Saylor responded by emphasizing that his company operates as a traditional business, not a fund or trust. The MSCI’s potential reclassification could result in companies holding large crypto reserves being removed from major equity [...] The post MSCI Considers Reclassifying Bitcoin Treasury Firms as Funds appeared first on Blockonomi.

MSCI Considers Reclassifying Bitcoin Treasury Firms as Funds

2025/11/22 04:04
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

TLDR

  • MSCI is consulting on whether Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana treasury companies should be classified as funds rather than businesses.
  • Michael Saylor responded by emphasizing that his company operates as a traditional business, not a fund or trust.
  • The MSCI’s potential reclassification could result in companies holding large crypto reserves being removed from major equity indices.
  • Saylor highlighted that his company innovates through a unique treasury strategy rather than simply holding assets.
  • The MSCI is expected to make a final decision on the reclassification of these companies by January 15, 2025.

The MSCI is currently consulting on whether companies that hold large reserves of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) should be reclassified as investment funds rather than traditional businesses. This includes companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy, which has a strategy focused on Bitcoin treasury. Saylor has reacted to the consultation, emphasizing that his company operates as a traditional business, not a fund or trust.

Saylor Responds to MSCI Consultation

Michael Saylor has publicly addressed the MSCI’s consultation on reclassifying companies that hold substantial cryptocurrency reserves. In a recent post, Saylor made it clear that their company does not align with investment funds or trusts.

Saylor further explained that their strategy is long-term and rooted in the belief that Bitcoin is a form of “productive capital.” He noted that the company’s mission remains focused on building the “world’s first digital monetary institution” based on sound money principles and financial innovation.

The MSCI’s consultation could impact companies like Saylor’s, which hold over 50% of their reserves in cryptocurrency. If the MSCI decides that such companies should be classified as investment vehicles, they may be excluded from major equity indices like the MSCI USA and MSCI World. This would be a significant shift in how the MSCI views these companies, which are currently classified as traditional businesses.

MSCI Index Impact on Bitcoin Treasury Companies

The MSCI’s consultation may have wide-ranging effects, especially for companies like Saylor’s, which holds a substantial amount of Bitcoin in its treasury. The MSCI index typically excludes investment funds and trusts from its equity benchmarks. If the MSCI decides to reclassify companies holding crypto reserves as investment funds, these companies could face removal from the index.

Saylor emphasized that no passive fund or trust could match his company’s operations. “We are not sitting on investments; we are innovating and building a business,” he said. His company has raised billions of dollars through public offerings of digital credit securities, highlighting its active role in the financial markets.

The debate centers around the unique structure of companies like Strategy, which combines elements of software development and treasury management. These companies view Bitcoin as a tool for creating long-term value, not as a passive asset to hold. As such, they argue that their business model should not be compared to investment funds or trusts.

Ethereum and Solana Treasury Companies Also Under Scrutiny

The MSCI’s consultation could extend beyond Bitcoin treasury companies. Ethereum and Solana treasury companies, such as Tom Lee’s BitMine, may also face similar scrutiny. While these companies hold substantial crypto assets, they engage in activities like staking and running validators, which could differentiate them from traditional funds or trusts.

These activities might strengthen the case for classifying Ethereum and Solana treasury companies as businesses rather than investment vehicles. By participating in decentralized finance (DeFi) and actively managing their crypto holdings, they argue that their operations are more in line with traditional businesses than with passive investment vehicles.

However, for companies like Saylor’s, which focus on Bitcoin as their primary asset, the distinction remains more difficult to define. The MSCI’s decision will likely have a lasting impact on how the market views these unique crypto treasury strategies. The final decision from the MSCI is expected by January 15, 2025.

The MSCI’s upcoming decision on whether to reclassify Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana treasury companies will have significant implications. Companies like Saylor’s Strategy, which holds large Bitcoin reserves, could face exclusion from major indices if they are classified as investment funds. This development is one of the latest signs of how the cryptocurrency sector is evolving within traditional financial frameworks.

The post MSCI Considers Reclassifying Bitcoin Treasury Firms as Funds appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003956
$0.0003956$0.0003956
-1.24%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pi Network Price Prediction – PI Price Estimated to Drop to $0.146552 By Mar 25, 2026

Pi Network Price Prediction – PI Price Estimated to Drop to $0.146552 By Mar 25, 2026

The post Pi Network Price Prediction – PI Price Estimated to Drop to $0.146552 By Mar 25, 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This is not investment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/21 08:10
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Bitmine has staked another 101,776 ETH, bringing its total staked amount to over 3.14 million ETH.

Bitmine has staked another 101,776 ETH, bringing its total staked amount to over 3.14 million ETH.

PANews reported on March 21 that, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, Ethereum treasury company Bitmine has staked another 101,776 ETH, worth $219.45 million.
Share
PANews2026/03/21 08:16