TLDR: Senate committee advances Selig as CFTC and crypto debate accelerates across trading circles. Market demand for onchain derivatives increases pressure on CFTC rulemaking choices. Posts from Pedersen and Chervinsky frame the vote as a key policy inflection point. Retail access concerns sharpen industry focus on upcoming Senate floor action. The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced [...] The post Senate Committee Moves Selig Nomination Forward as Debate Over CFTC and Crypto Intensifies appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR: Senate committee advances Selig as CFTC and crypto debate accelerates across trading circles. Market demand for onchain derivatives increases pressure on CFTC rulemaking choices. Posts from Pedersen and Chervinsky frame the vote as a key policy inflection point. Retail access concerns sharpen industry focus on upcoming Senate floor action. The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced [...] The post Senate Committee Moves Selig Nomination Forward as Debate Over CFTC and Crypto Intensifies appeared first on Blockonomi.

Senate Committee Moves Selig Nomination Forward as Debate Over CFTC and Crypto Intensifies

TLDR:

  • Senate committee advances Selig as CFTC and crypto debate accelerates across trading circles.
  • Market demand for onchain derivatives increases pressure on CFTC rulemaking choices.
  • Posts from Pedersen and Chervinsky frame the vote as a key policy inflection point.
  • Retail access concerns sharpen industry focus on upcoming Senate floor action.

The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced Mike Selig’s nomination for CFTC Chair on a tight 12–11 vote. No Democrats supported the move, according to reporter Brendan Pedersen. 

The nomination now heads to the Senate floor for a broader decision. The shift comes as the debate over CFTC and crypto gains new urgency across the market.

CFTC and Crypto Policy Moves Into Focus

The committee’s vote sparked immediate industry attention as traders watched how the next chair might approach rulemaking. According to posts from Pedersen, the close margin underscored the political divide around the agency’s direction. 

Market participants tracked the development because CFTC and crypto policy remains unsettled. The nomination signaled a potential turning point for rule changes tied to onchain activity.

Commentary from Jake Chervinsky added context on why the agency matters for current demand. He noted that many widely used products fall under CFTC oversight due to their derivatives structure. 

He also pointed out that most platforms geofence the United States because they cannot meet the Commodity Exchange Act. His remarks framed the agency as a central force in shaping how crypto derivatives reach users.

Chervinsky stressed that penalties for violations can be severe, which keeps many developers cautious. His analysis connected compliance gaps to the limited availability of certain services in the United States. 

He said the CFTC could address these gaps through updated rules aligned with onchain systems. His comments suggested the chair’s stance could influence the next phase for CFTC and crypto policy.

He also referenced tension between innovation goals and TradFi influence. He described a regulatory environment where established institutions hold considerable sway. 

His remarks presented the upcoming decision as a test for long-term market structure changes. Market watchers followed his thread as the Senate prepared its next step.

Derivatives Demand Sharpens Pressure on Lawmakers

Industry discussions highlighted strong retail interest in products tied to onchain platforms. Chervinsky said the agency’s mandate does not require blocking newer systems that address core risks with updated tech. 

Moreover, his framing linked CFTC and crypto to broader market access debates. The narrative resonated across trading circles seeking clearer guidance.

His posts also pointed to taxpayers showing high demand for regulated market access. 

Chervinsky argued that improved rules could support competition among platforms using onchain mechanisms. His view illustrated why the nomination attracted close industry attention during the committee vote. The Senate floor decision now carries weight for policy direction.

Pedersen’s update signaled that the process could take additional time as lawmakers weigh competing priorities. 

His coverage marked the vote as the first major test in the confirmation path. Traders monitored reactions as stakeholders assessed Selig’s potential role in policy debates. The industry continued tracking each update due to its effect on CFTC and crypto alignment.

The post Senate Committee Moves Selig Nomination Forward as Debate Over CFTC and Crypto Intensifies appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41