The post China And Australia In New Rare Earths And Iron Ore Disputes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Australia and China are edging closer to a re-run of their 2020 trade war as a double-header minerals dispute breaks out over iron ore exports and rare earth investment. The undeveloped Browns Range rare earth deposit in the north of Western Australia is an asset wanted by both Chinese investors and the U.S. Government. Terbium and Dysprosium are at the heart of a new rare earths dispute getty Rich in the so-called heavy rare earths of dysprosium and terbium used in advanced weapons systems, Browns Range is owned by a small Australian stock exchange (ASX) listed company, Northern Minerals. Plans to start mining Browns Range are advanced with the U.S. Government’s Export-Import Bank considering a $250 million loan to part fund ongoing work. But that deal is being jeopardized by secretive Chinese investment in Northern Minerals, sparking a flurry of corporate activity last week, including a request by the company to Australian corporate regulators to postpone its annual meeting scheduled for later this week. The company said in a statement filed with the ASX that it was concerned that Chinese investors, who had been ordered to sell their shares in the Australian company, had defied the order from the Australian Government and retain effective control of a large parcel of shares Chinese interest in Northern Minerals has prompted previous intervention by the Australian Treasurer (Finance Minister), Jim Chalmers, under foreign investment laws. The company said it wanted it’s meeting postponed to ensure full transparency with government agencies “both in Australia and overseas, in relation to potential funding support for the Browns Range development”. Iron Ore Coincidence At the same time Northern Minerals was calling for government help in identifying Chinese investors in its shares, and whether they were connected to people and companies previously ordered to sell, a long-running dispute… The post China And Australia In New Rare Earths And Iron Ore Disputes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Australia and China are edging closer to a re-run of their 2020 trade war as a double-header minerals dispute breaks out over iron ore exports and rare earth investment. The undeveloped Browns Range rare earth deposit in the north of Western Australia is an asset wanted by both Chinese investors and the U.S. Government. Terbium and Dysprosium are at the heart of a new rare earths dispute getty Rich in the so-called heavy rare earths of dysprosium and terbium used in advanced weapons systems, Browns Range is owned by a small Australian stock exchange (ASX) listed company, Northern Minerals. Plans to start mining Browns Range are advanced with the U.S. Government’s Export-Import Bank considering a $250 million loan to part fund ongoing work. But that deal is being jeopardized by secretive Chinese investment in Northern Minerals, sparking a flurry of corporate activity last week, including a request by the company to Australian corporate regulators to postpone its annual meeting scheduled for later this week. The company said in a statement filed with the ASX that it was concerned that Chinese investors, who had been ordered to sell their shares in the Australian company, had defied the order from the Australian Government and retain effective control of a large parcel of shares Chinese interest in Northern Minerals has prompted previous intervention by the Australian Treasurer (Finance Minister), Jim Chalmers, under foreign investment laws. The company said it wanted it’s meeting postponed to ensure full transparency with government agencies “both in Australia and overseas, in relation to potential funding support for the Browns Range development”. Iron Ore Coincidence At the same time Northern Minerals was calling for government help in identifying Chinese investors in its shares, and whether they were connected to people and companies previously ordered to sell, a long-running dispute…

China And Australia In New Rare Earths And Iron Ore Disputes

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Australia and China are edging closer to a re-run of their 2020 trade war as a double-header minerals dispute breaks out over iron ore exports and rare earth investment.

The undeveloped Browns Range rare earth deposit in the north of Western Australia is an asset wanted by both Chinese investors and the U.S. Government.

Terbium and Dysprosium are at the heart of a new rare earths dispute

getty

Rich in the so-called heavy rare earths of dysprosium and terbium used in advanced weapons systems, Browns Range is owned by a small Australian stock exchange (ASX) listed company, Northern Minerals.

Plans to start mining Browns Range are advanced with the U.S. Government’s Export-Import Bank considering a $250 million loan to part fund ongoing work.

But that deal is being jeopardized by secretive Chinese investment in Northern Minerals, sparking a flurry of corporate activity last week, including a request by the company to Australian corporate regulators to postpone its annual meeting scheduled for later this week.

The company said in a statement filed with the ASX that it was concerned that Chinese investors, who had been ordered to sell their shares in the Australian company, had defied the order from the Australian Government and retain effective control of a large parcel of shares

Chinese interest in Northern Minerals has prompted previous intervention by the Australian Treasurer (Finance Minister), Jim Chalmers, under foreign investment laws.

The company said it wanted it’s meeting postponed to ensure full transparency with government agencies “both in Australia and overseas, in relation to potential funding support for the Browns Range development”.

Iron Ore Coincidence

At the same time Northern Minerals was calling for government help in identifying Chinese investors in its shares, and whether they were connected to people and companies previously ordered to sell, a long-running dispute over iron ore prices took a fresh twist with a report of a ban by China on a type of iron ore.

At first glance the rare earth investment clash and the iron ore ban might not appear to be connected but because Chinese is the common thread there is a chance that what’s happening at Northern Minerals has provoked a response from the relativity new China Mineral Resources Group (CMRG).

Established by the Chinese Government to oversee and coordinate all mineral trading there is little doubt that the CMRG will be fully aware of what’s happening at Northern Minerals, especially given the political sensitivity of rare earths.

BHP iron ore being railed to Port Hedland for export. Photo by Fairfax Media via Getty Images/Fairfax Media via Getty Images via Getty Images)

Fairfax Media via Getty Images

According to the Australian Financial Review newspaper, Chinese steel mills have been instructed by the CMRG to not buy a low-grade ore called Jingbao fines from Australia’s biggest mining company, BHP.

If correct, the Jingbao order is second BHP iron ore product to be backlisted, following a similar earlier this year for Chinese steel mills to not buy Jimbelbar fines.

Both the Jingbao and Jimblebar material is secondary to BHP’s overall iron ore exports, but the message is clear, China wants BHP and other iron ore exporters to cut their prices to aid the country’s steel industry, starting with a demand that all iron ore is transacted in Chinese currency, not U.S. dollars.

The iron ore dispute has not yet affected the marker price of the material which is based on high-grade ore. It was last quoted on the Singapore Exchange at $104.25 a ton, where it was a month ago.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timtreadgold/2025/11/23/china-and-australia-in-new-rare-earths-and-iron-ore-disputes/

Market Opportunity
SuperRare Logo
SuperRare Price(RARE)
$0.01554
$0.01554$0.01554
-0.89%
USD
SuperRare (RARE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Targets $10,000 In 2026 But Layer Brett Could Reach $1 From $0.0058

Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Targets $10,000 In 2026 But Layer Brett Could Reach $1 From $0.0058

Ethereum price predictions are turning heads, with analysts suggesting ETH could climb to $10,000 by 2026 as institutional demand and network upgrades drive growth. While Ethereum remains a blue-chip asset, investors looking for sharper multiples are eyeing Layer Brett (LBRETT). Currently in presale at just $0.0058, the Ethereum Layer 2 meme coin is drawing huge [...] The post Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Targets $10,000 In 2026 But Layer Brett Could Reach $1 From $0.0058 appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/17 23:45
ReserveOne Announces Filing of Second Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-4 with the SEC for Proposed Business Combination with M3-Brigade Acquisition V Corp.

ReserveOne Announces Filing of Second Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-4 with the SEC for Proposed Business Combination with M3-Brigade Acquisition V Corp.

The proposed business combination was initially announced on July 8, 2025.NEW YORK, March 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ReserveOne, Inc. ("ReserveOne") and ReserveOne
Share
CryptoReporter2026/03/21 06:43