On-chain data shows short-term Bitcoin holders have capitulated, a pattern seen near previous local bottoms.On-chain data shows short-term Bitcoin holders have capitulated, a pattern seen near previous local bottoms.

Is This the Cycle Bottom? Short-Term Holders Capitulated as BTC Hit $80K

2025/11/24 17:22

Bitcoin (BTC) is testing the $80,000 support level, a price point not seen in six months, following a steep 36% drop from its October all-time high.

This downturn has triggered a massive wave of capitulation from short-term investors, a potential sign that a local bottom is forming, even as long-term holders begin to distribute their BTC at a historic rate.

Market Sentiment and On-Chain Signals Point to a Crossroads

The mood across social media and on-chain data platforms is one of heightened caution. According to an analysis by Crypto Dan, investors who have held Bitcoin for less than 155 days have officially capitulated.

This group, often driven by emotion, has seen its sentiment flip from positive to negative, with the market watcher noting that similar behavior was observed at the lows of previous corrections within this bull cycle, suggesting a potential rebound is likely. However, he warned that if Bitcoin fails to hold the $80,000 level, the market could be in for a much more difficult period.

Adding to the narrative, data shared by another analyst, CryptoOnchain, revealed a historic transfer of wealth. Their metrics show a massive outflow of 63,000 BTC from long-term holder wallets, a classic sign of distribution near market tops.

At the same time, short-term holders are accumulating that supply, buying the dip at prices around $87,000. This dynamic is creating a fragile balance where, if new demand cannot absorb this selling pressure, it could lead to a deeper correction.

There were more bearish signals from GugaOnChain, who highlighted that a key on-chain metric, the Binary Coin Days Destroyed (CDD), triggered a sell signal on November 23.

This, according to them, has happened four previous times in this cycle, and a price correction followed each instance. The current signal, with a CDD value of over 25 million, indicates a significant reactivation of old BTC, typically for the purpose of selling.

A Broader Look at Demand and Price Trajectory

The sell-off highlighted by CryptoDan is happening against a backdrop of fading institutional demand. As earlier reported by CryptoQuant, the growth in spot Bitcoin ETF holdings has slowed to one of its weakest paces since launch.

Furthermore, public companies that were once major buyers have seen their purchasing power evaporate, with Strategy reducing its annual acquisitions from 171,000 BTC to just 9,600 BTC.

Meanwhile, at the market, the flagship cryptocurrency managed to pull together a recovery to its current level of about $87,000 after hitting a low near $82,000 in the past week. Still, it remains down about 22% in the last 30 days and nearly 12% year-on-year.

The breach of the $90,000 support level, a key psychological barrier, has now shifted analyst focus toward the next major support zone between $70,000 and $73,000. This area is critical as it matches the average purchase price of major holders of the asset, who may step in to defend their positions.

Even prominent investors are adjusting their strategies. Author Robert Kiyosaki recently revealed that he sold $2.25 million worth of BTC at around $90,000, though he stated he remains bullish and plans to reinvest his profits.

The post Is This the Cycle Bottom? Short-Term Holders Capitulated as BTC Hit $80K appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40