The post Digital Asset Treasuries Can’t Hold Premiums, Warns Bitwise CIO  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Digital asset treasuries are back in the spotlight as market analysts warn that their long-standing premium valuations may not survive the changing landscape. With spot ETFs offering cleaner exposure and new regulatory pressures emerging, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan says the traditional DAT model is confronting a “high hurdle” that most firms will struggle …The post Digital Asset Treasuries Can’t Hold Premiums, Warns Bitwise CIO  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Digital asset treasuries are back in the spotlight as market analysts warn that their long-standing premium valuations may not survive the changing landscape. With spot ETFs offering cleaner exposure and new regulatory pressures emerging, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan says the traditional DAT model is confronting a “high hurdle” that most firms will struggle …

Digital Asset Treasuries Can’t Hold Premiums, Warns Bitwise CIO

2025/11/24 20:25
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
Digital Asset Treasuries vs ETFs

The post Digital Asset Treasuries Can’t Hold Premiums, Warns Bitwise CIO  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Digital asset treasuries are back in the spotlight as market analysts warn that their long-standing premium valuations may not survive the changing landscape. With spot ETFs offering cleaner exposure and new regulatory pressures emerging, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan says the traditional DAT model is confronting a “high hurdle” that most firms will struggle to clear.

Bitwise CIO: Premiums Are the Exception, Not the Rule

Hougan argues that the majority of digital asset treasuries are structurally wired to trade below the value of the crypto they hold. According to him, three forces, illiquidity, expenses, and operational risks, consistently push valuations downward.

He explains that investors typically discount DATs because they do not receive direct ownership of the underlying assets. “Why pay full price for bitcoin you’ll receive in a year?” he asked, noting that any delay or friction automatically suppresses market value.

Beyond illiquidity, Hougan highlights ongoing costs. Operating expenses, salaries, and administrative overhead slowly dilute crypto-per-share over time. Meanwhile, execution risks, ranging from management mistakes to unforeseen losses, further widen the gap between a DAT’s balance sheet and its market valuation.

These pressures, he says, form a baseline discount that DATs must constantly fight against.

Limited Tools to Fight Structural Drag

While there are ways for treasury companies to boost returns, such as issuing debt, lending tokens, buying assets below market value, or selling options, Hougan describes these as uncertain levers that only work under specific conditions. Worse yet, they frequently introduce new risks that can undermine the firm’s long-term stability.

  • Also Read :
  •   Is Strategy in Trouble? Institutions Sell $5.4B Ahead of Possible Delisting
  •   ,

“Expenses and risk compound over time,” Hougan warned, adding that even well-managed DATs face mounting difficulty sustaining premiums through multiple market cycles. Only a few exceptional players, he believes, are capable of outperforming this structural gravity.

ETFs Emerge as the Preferred Alternative

As DATs encounter growing structural challenges, market sentiment has shifted toward exchange-traded funds. ETF specialist Nate Geraci says spot ETFs have become “DAT killers,” offering simple, precise exposure without the friction of treasury-style structures. Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas agrees, noting that ETFs achieve the same goal but with cleaner tracking and fewer moving parts. This discussion comes just as MSCI considers excluding crypto-heavy companies from major indexes, an adjustment that could trigger billions in passive outflows.

Adding to the conversation, Inspired Analyst noted that Bitwise’s CEO has recently bought Bitcoin at $85,000 and $89,000, while Hougan believes solid projects like ETH, XRP, and UNI continue to progress quietly. He expects clearer regulations in 2026 to unlock even greater value for these assets.

With the industry preparing for major structural changes, crypto treasuries may be entering their most challenging chapter yet.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

What are digital asset treasuries (DATs)?

DATs are companies that hold crypto on their balance sheets and trade like stocks. They give investors indirect exposure to digital assets.

Are ETFs better than digital asset treasuries?

Spot ETFs provide cleaner, faster exposure to crypto with fewer risks, making them a preferred option for many investors today.

Can DATs still maintain premium valuations?

Premiums are rare. Most DATs struggle to stay above asset value because rising costs and execution risks weigh on long-term performance.

How will new regulations impact DATs and ETFs?

Upcoming rules may favor ETFs by improving safeguards and clarity, while DATs could face more pressure from compliance and tighter oversight.

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006421
$0.006421$0.006421
-0.74%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

The post SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SoFi Technologies has selected BitGo Bank & Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/06 01:50
The reality of today

The reality of today

It may take a long time to process and to reach the point of awakening. Then we discover what is important in life — the value of creating, giving, and contributing
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/06 00:02
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00