The post Bipartisan Legislation Targets Rising Threat of AI-Powered Impersonation and Fraud appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Reps. Ted Lieu and Neal Dunn have introduced the AI Fraud Deterrence Act following high-profile AI impersonation incidents. The bill increases maximum penalties for AI-assisted fraud to $2 million in fines and up to 30 years in prison for bank fraud. Hackers used AI to impersonate White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in May and July. Congress is cracking down on AI-powered scams with bipartisan legislation that would send fraudsters to prison for decades after brazen impersonation attacks targeted America’s top officials. The AI Fraud Deterrence Act, introduced by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Rep. Neal Dunn (R-FL) on Tuesday, would raise maximum fines to $2 million and extend prison sentences up to 30 years for bank fraud committed with AI assistance, according to a Tuesday statement. Pleased to introduce the AI Fraud Deterrence Act today with @DrNealDunnFL2, which would expand penalties for AI scams and deepfakes, including impersonations of federal officials. Our bipartisan goal is simple: Deter people from using AI to commit fraud. pic.twitter.com/ixUe854KRV — Rep. Ted Lieu (@RepTedLieu) November 25, 2025 The legislation targets wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and impersonation of federal officials. “AI has lowered the barrier of entry for scammers, which can have devastating effects,” Lieu said in the statement, warning that impersonations of U.S. officials “can be disastrous for our national security.” AI fraud escalating The bill comes after scammers used AI a few months back to breach White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles’s cellphone, impersonating her voice in calls to senators, governors, business leaders, and other high-level contacts. Two months later, fraudsters mimicked Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s voice in calls to three foreign ministers, a member of Congress, and a governor in an apparent attempt to obtain sensitive information and… The post Bipartisan Legislation Targets Rising Threat of AI-Powered Impersonation and Fraud appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Reps. Ted Lieu and Neal Dunn have introduced the AI Fraud Deterrence Act following high-profile AI impersonation incidents. The bill increases maximum penalties for AI-assisted fraud to $2 million in fines and up to 30 years in prison for bank fraud. Hackers used AI to impersonate White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in May and July. Congress is cracking down on AI-powered scams with bipartisan legislation that would send fraudsters to prison for decades after brazen impersonation attacks targeted America’s top officials. The AI Fraud Deterrence Act, introduced by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Rep. Neal Dunn (R-FL) on Tuesday, would raise maximum fines to $2 million and extend prison sentences up to 30 years for bank fraud committed with AI assistance, according to a Tuesday statement. Pleased to introduce the AI Fraud Deterrence Act today with @DrNealDunnFL2, which would expand penalties for AI scams and deepfakes, including impersonations of federal officials. Our bipartisan goal is simple: Deter people from using AI to commit fraud. pic.twitter.com/ixUe854KRV — Rep. Ted Lieu (@RepTedLieu) November 25, 2025 The legislation targets wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and impersonation of federal officials. “AI has lowered the barrier of entry for scammers, which can have devastating effects,” Lieu said in the statement, warning that impersonations of U.S. officials “can be disastrous for our national security.” AI fraud escalating The bill comes after scammers used AI a few months back to breach White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles’s cellphone, impersonating her voice in calls to senators, governors, business leaders, and other high-level contacts. Two months later, fraudsters mimicked Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s voice in calls to three foreign ministers, a member of Congress, and a governor in an apparent attempt to obtain sensitive information and…

Bipartisan Legislation Targets Rising Threat of AI-Powered Impersonation and Fraud

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

In brief

  • Reps. Ted Lieu and Neal Dunn have introduced the AI Fraud Deterrence Act following high-profile AI impersonation incidents.
  • The bill increases maximum penalties for AI-assisted fraud to $2 million in fines and up to 30 years in prison for bank fraud.
  • Hackers used AI to impersonate White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in May and July.

Congress is cracking down on AI-powered scams with bipartisan legislation that would send fraudsters to prison for decades after brazen impersonation attacks targeted America’s top officials.

The AI Fraud Deterrence Act, introduced by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Rep. Neal Dunn (R-FL) on Tuesday, would raise maximum fines to $2 million and extend prison sentences up to 30 years for bank fraud committed with AI assistance, according to a Tuesday statement.

The legislation targets wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and impersonation of federal officials.

“AI has lowered the barrier of entry for scammers, which can have devastating effects,” Lieu said in the statement, warning that impersonations of U.S. officials “can be disastrous for our national security.”

AI fraud escalating

The bill comes after scammers used AI a few months back to breach White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles’s cellphone, impersonating her voice in calls to senators, governors, business leaders, and other high-level contacts.

Two months later, fraudsters mimicked Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s voice in calls to three foreign ministers, a member of Congress, and a governor in an apparent attempt to obtain sensitive information and account access, according to the bill.

The bill adopts the 2020 National AI Initiative Act’s definition of AI and carves out First Amendment protections, exempting satire, parody, and other expressive uses that include a clear disclosure of inauthenticity.

AI-aided mail and wire fraud would carry up to 20 years and a $1 million in fines, with standard penalties rising to $2 million. AI-driven bank fraud could draw 30 years and a $2 million penalty.

AI-assisted money laundering would carry up to 20 years in prison and fines of $1 million or three times the transaction value, and AI impersonation of federal officials would bring three years and a $1 million penalty.

“AI is advancing at a rapid pace, and our laws have to keep pace with it,” Dunn noted, cautioning that when criminals use AI to steal identities or defraud Americans, “the consequences should be severe enough to match the crime.”

Meanwhile, President Trump is reportedly weighing an executive order to dismantle state AI laws and assert federal primacy, even as more than 200 state lawmakers urge Congress to reject House Republicans’ push to fold an AI-preemption clause into the defense bill.

A similar moratorium collapsed in July after a 99–1 Senate vote, and opposition has since widened, though a draft order circulating last week shows the White House considering its own path to override state rules.

Proving AI use in court

Mohith Agadi, co-founder of Provenance AI, an AI agent and fact-checking SaaS backed by Fact Protocol, told Decrypt that the bipartisan nature of this bill points to a growing consensus that “AI-driven impersonation and fraud demand urgent action.”

“The real challenge is proving in court that AI was used,” Agadi said. “Synthetic content can be difficult to attribute, and existing forensic tools are inconsistent.”

“Lawmakers need to pair these penalties with investments in digital forensics and provenance systems like C2PA that clearly document a content’s origin,” he noted, or else we risk creating laws that are “conceptually strong but practically hard to enforce.”

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.

Source: https://decrypt.co/350065/bipartisan-legislation-targets-rising-threat-of-ai-powered-impersonation-and-fraud

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders

Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders

The post Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve Finance has proposed a new protocol called Yield Basis that would share revenue directly with CRV holders, marking a shift from one-off incentives to sustainable income. Summary Curve Finance has put forward a revenue-sharing protocol to give CRV holders sustainable income beyond emissions and fees. The plan would mint $60M in crvUSD to seed three Bitcoin liquidity pools (WBTC, cbBTC, tBTC), with 35–65% of revenue distributed to veCRV stakers. The DAO vote runs from up to Sept. 24, with the proposal seen as a major step to strengthen CRV tokenomics after past liquidity and governance challenges. Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov has introduced a proposal to give CRV token holders a more direct way to earn income, launching a system called Yield Basis that aims to turn the governance token into a sustainable, yield-bearing asset.  The proposal has been published on the Curve DAO (CRV) governance forum, with voting open until Sept. 24. A new model for CRV rewards Yield Basis is designed to distribute transparent and consistent returns to CRV holders who lock their tokens for veCRV governance rights. Unlike past incentive programs, which relied heavily on airdrops and emissions, the protocol channels income from Bitcoin-focused liquidity pools directly back to token holders. To start, Curve would mint $60 million worth of crvUSD, its over-collateralized stablecoin, with proceeds allocated across three pools — WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC — each capped at $10 million. 25% of Yield Basis tokens would be reserved for the Curve ecosystem, and between 35% and 65% of Yield Basis’s revenue would be given to veCRV holders. By emphasizing Bitcoin (BTC) liquidity and offering yields without the short-term loss risks associated with automated market makers, the protocol hopes to draw in professional traders and institutions. Context and potential impact on Curve Finance The proposal comes as Curve continues to modify…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:37