The post QwQiao Questions Long-term Value of L1 Tokens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights QwQiao argues that major L1 networks and tokens lack lasting competitive advantages, also known as a moat, which makes it vulnerable  He believes that the main problem is that it is now too easy for users and developers to switch between different blockchains, which pulls down the long-term value of their tokens He proposed a solution, saying that blockchains should build apps and services directly on their networks On November 27, QwQiao, a partner at the Alliance DAO, shared a tweet in which he raised questions about the long-term value of L1 tokens.  (Source: QwQiao on X) In the latest post on X, he stated that he has a “hard time convincing” to hold Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens for the long term. His concern was not about their current high prices. Instead, he questioned their very core structure by stating that L1 networks do not have a “moat.” Without this much-needed protection, he believes that these infrastructure chains will become simple commodities, like electricity or water. Due to this, it will be unable to capture major value over time.  L1 Tokens Have No Moat: QwQiao The main point of QwQiao’s argument is very simple. He mentioned that in today’s crypto sector, there is almost no friction in preventing users, developers, or capital locked on the blockchain from leaving one blockchain for another.  According to QwQiao, it only takes a few minutes to move digital assets between different blockchains, thanks to advanced bridge technologies like Wormhole and LayerZero. The total volume of these cross-chain transfers has already surpassed billions of dollars in 2025.  For developers, the process of moving an application is also easy. Most can transfer their code across compatible chains in a few days. The rise of user-friendly development tools has even simplified the process of… The post QwQiao Questions Long-term Value of L1 Tokens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights QwQiao argues that major L1 networks and tokens lack lasting competitive advantages, also known as a moat, which makes it vulnerable  He believes that the main problem is that it is now too easy for users and developers to switch between different blockchains, which pulls down the long-term value of their tokens He proposed a solution, saying that blockchains should build apps and services directly on their networks On November 27, QwQiao, a partner at the Alliance DAO, shared a tweet in which he raised questions about the long-term value of L1 tokens.  (Source: QwQiao on X) In the latest post on X, he stated that he has a “hard time convincing” to hold Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens for the long term. His concern was not about their current high prices. Instead, he questioned their very core structure by stating that L1 networks do not have a “moat.” Without this much-needed protection, he believes that these infrastructure chains will become simple commodities, like electricity or water. Due to this, it will be unable to capture major value over time.  L1 Tokens Have No Moat: QwQiao The main point of QwQiao’s argument is very simple. He mentioned that in today’s crypto sector, there is almost no friction in preventing users, developers, or capital locked on the blockchain from leaving one blockchain for another.  According to QwQiao, it only takes a few minutes to move digital assets between different blockchains, thanks to advanced bridge technologies like Wormhole and LayerZero. The total volume of these cross-chain transfers has already surpassed billions of dollars in 2025.  For developers, the process of moving an application is also easy. Most can transfer their code across compatible chains in a few days. The rise of user-friendly development tools has even simplified the process of…

QwQiao Questions Long-term Value of L1 Tokens

Key Highlights

  • QwQiao argues that major L1 networks and tokens lack lasting competitive advantages, also known as a moat, which makes it vulnerable 
  • He believes that the main problem is that it is now too easy for users and developers to switch between different blockchains, which pulls down the long-term value of their tokens
  • He proposed a solution, saying that blockchains should build apps and services directly on their networks

On November 27, QwQiao, a partner at the Alliance DAO, shared a tweet in which he raised questions about the long-term value of L1 tokens. 

(Source: QwQiao on X)

In the latest post on X, he stated that he has a “hard time convincing” to hold Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens for the long term. His concern was not about their current high prices. Instead, he questioned their very core structure by stating that L1 networks do not have a “moat.”

Without this much-needed protection, he believes that these infrastructure chains will become simple commodities, like electricity or water. Due to this, it will be unable to capture major value over time. 

L1 Tokens Have No Moat: QwQiao

The main point of QwQiao’s argument is very simple. He mentioned that in today’s crypto sector, there is almost no friction in preventing users, developers, or capital locked on the blockchain from leaving one blockchain for another. 

According to QwQiao, it only takes a few minutes to move digital assets between different blockchains, thanks to advanced bridge technologies like Wormhole and LayerZero. The total volume of these cross-chain transfers has already surpassed billions of dollars in 2025. 

For developers, the process of moving an application is also easy. Most can transfer their code across compatible chains in a few days. The rise of user-friendly development tools has even simplified the process of moving to non-compatible networks. 

Apart from this, it just takes weeks to launch an entirely new blockchain or application-based rollup, not years, with the help of readily available kits. 

This infrastructure makes the cost of switching blockchains low in comparison to the difficulty of moving a company’s data off a cloud service provider like Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Qw stated that “its a no brainer to believe in the exponential, but the best expression of this view is to bet on the app layer.”

QW is partner of Alliance DAO, which is an organization known as one of the most successful DAOs in the cryptocurrency space. It is also known as the DeFi Alliance. This group has helped launch major projects like Pump.fun and Fantasy Top. 

It has raised $50 million in the fundraising round by top-tier investment firms like Sequoia and Paradigm. 

Before this, Qw has also raised earlier warnings in 2025 about risks in retail ETFs, and AI tokens have proven correct. Now, his views on L1 tokens have become a topic of debate among the crypto community. 

QwQiao Thinks Vertical Integration is a Solution

QwQiao has also shared his solution for the survival of L1 networks. He argues that they must stop acting as pure infrastructure and instead fully move to own the application layer built on top of them.

the only way as far as i can see for chains to strengthen their moat is to verticalize and own the app layer. my perception is chains solana, base, and hyperliquid have come to this conclusion and r actively working on it. and ofc so do the up and coming corp chains like tempo,” he said.

He mentioned Base, an L2 network from Coinbase, as an example. It is quickly attracting a large user base of new DeFi activity.  He also mentioned Hyperliquid, which is a decentralised exchange (DEX) built on its own high-performance Layer 1 blockchain.

Source: https://www.cryptonewsz.com/qwqiao-questions-long-term-value-of-l1-tokens/

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.00267
$0.00267$0.00267
+6.16%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

The post Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy CEO Phong Le will join
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:48
Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

The White House reportedly took the lead during the latest Crypto Council meeting, narrowing the stablecoin rewards dispute that has delayed progress in the long
Share
Bitcoinist2026/02/21 15:30
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28