South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake. The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers […]South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake. The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers […]

South Korea is weighing a rule that limits won-stablecoin issuance to consortia where commercial banks hold at least a 51% stake

2025/12/03 05:15
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake.

The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers from the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DP), officials from the Financial Services Commission (FSC), and representatives of the banking industry on December 1, comes as part of the ongoing effort to enact a comprehensive Digital Asset Basic Act, which will regulate stablecoins and other digital assets and their issuance.

Banks lead, fintechs follow in the proposed consortium

Under the new framework, stablecoin issuers will take the form of a consortium, with banks holding at least 51% of the shares.

Speaking after the meeting, Kang Junhyun, the Democratic Party’s secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee, confirmed what was discussed in the meeting, stating, “The controversial issue of who will issue stablecoins has been resolved in a ‘consortium format’ by coordinating the positions of the Bank of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and the banking industry.”

South Korea’s regulatory and political deadline

Lawmakers went on to impose a deadline on the government, demanding that the government submit a draft bill containing the main framework by December 10. 

Kang stated that “if the government proposal is not submitted by this deadline, we will push forward with legislation initiated by lawmakers through the Political Affairs Committee.”

According to statements made by Kang, lawmakers are going to quickly share and propose the finalized bill and then go through a public debate process with the Digital Asset Task Force within the Democratic Party.

He stated, “Even if discussions are possible within this year, the actual passage of the bill will likely happen in January next year. I am not sure what the opposition (People Power Party) thinks, but the discussion process seems likely to take some time.”

Diverging views as consortium plan is not yet finalized

Last month, the country’s central bank, Bank of Korea (BOK), warned that non-bank stablecoin issuers could threaten monetary policy, deposit-protection frameworks, and financial stability. 

It argues that such entities would essentially be acting like narrow banks, where they issue currency and also offer payment services. It seems the consortium arrangement is an answer to the apex bank’s concerns. 

However, the stablecoin ecosystem, including some fintech advocates and industry stakeholders, says that limiting issuance to banks may hinder innovation and competition. 

They argue that strictly bank-dominated stablecoin issuance would reduce such coins to little more than digital bank deposits, impacting potential use cases, from cross-border payments to decentralized finance applications.

Moreover, even after the December 1 meeting, the FSC issued a statement noting that “no decision had been finalized” regarding the consortium plan, indicating that the regulatory framework is yet to get the consensus of all parties involved. Attention will now be on the government’s response to the ultimatum the lawmakers have given it.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Rarely does software designed for one market translate smoothly to another. The most obvious obstacle is language, but it’s not the only one. Before a product feels
Share
Techbullion2026/03/25 19:10
₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

Court grants bail to CoinDCX founders after ₹71L scam traced to fake site; no link found, funds recovered, platform secure. The court granted bail to CoinDCX founders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/03/25 19:43
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52