US Representative Stephen Lynch challenged Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman on Tuesday, questioning her past statements encouraging banks to “engage fully” with digital assets.  Lynch also inquired about the Fed’s role in advancing crypto regulatory requirements, while also highlighting confusion regarding the definition of stablecoins.  Lynch confronts Fed on crypto oversight and stablecoin definitions During an oversight hearing, Lynch cited Bowman’s comments at the November Santander International Banking Conference, where she expressed support for banks “[engaging] fully” with digital assets. Bowman clarified that her comments applied broadly to digital assets, rather than specifically to cryptocurrencies.  Lynch pressed her on the distinction between digital assets and stablecoins, and the discussion shifted. Bowman replied that Congress, through the GENIUS Act—a law regulating payment stablecoins—has authorised the Fed to develop a framework for digital asset activities. “The GENIUS Act requires us to promulgate regulations to allow these types of activities,” Bowman said. Though the price of several digital assets can be volatile, stablecoins, like those pegged to the US dollar, are generally “stable,” as the name suggests.  While there have been some occasions where some coins have depegged from their respective currencies, like the crash of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin some three years ago, the overwhelming majority of stablecoins do not fluctuate past 1% of their peg. Bowman earlier noted that staff at the Fed should be allowed to hold small “amounts of crypto or other types of digital assets” to grasp better how the technology works. FDIC prepares national stablecoin framework under GENIUS Act Travis Hill, acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was also present at Tuesday’s hearing. The government agency is one of many responsible for implementing the GENIUS Act, which US President Donald Trump signed into law in July. According to Hill, the FDIC will propose a stablecoin framework “later this month,” which will include requirements for supervising issuers. In a few weeks, the legislative Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will release its first set of proposed guidelines under the GENIUS Act. This represents a significant step forward for the US in its efforts to establish a legislative framework for stablecoins.  According to Hill, the proposal will explain how stablecoin issuers linked to FDIC-insured banks are regulated and monitored nationwide, moving away from the current system of fragmented, state-by-state monitoring. That’s only part of a broader effort by regulators to make clearer how traditional banking authorities monitor digital assets such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits. The FDIC’s plan follows President Donald Trump’s signing of a law in July that, for the first time, establishes national requirements for US stablecoins. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes the first government rules for payment stablecoins. It assigns tasks to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to ensure the law is carried out. These agencies recently informed the House Financial Services Committee about their plans. This means that the law would eliminate the need for different state systems and establish a single national standard for issuer licensing and supervision. According to the framework, federal prudential regulators will be responsible for bank-linked issuers; however, states will still be responsible for non-bank businesses unless new rules expand the federal reach.  The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation noted that the FDIC will directly oversee the subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks that want to issue stablecoins. Before a bank’s subsidiary launches a stablecoin, it must submit a formal application. The FDIC will then scrutinize the bank’s business strategies, risk management practices, and compliance procedures. The first rule this month will establish the application framework for issuers connected to banks. A second proposal, scheduled for release early next year, will establish capital, liquidity, and reserve asset norms for payment stablecoin issuers. These will be the main regulatory protections for this group. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.US Representative Stephen Lynch challenged Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman on Tuesday, questioning her past statements encouraging banks to “engage fully” with digital assets.  Lynch also inquired about the Fed’s role in advancing crypto regulatory requirements, while also highlighting confusion regarding the definition of stablecoins.  Lynch confronts Fed on crypto oversight and stablecoin definitions During an oversight hearing, Lynch cited Bowman’s comments at the November Santander International Banking Conference, where she expressed support for banks “[engaging] fully” with digital assets. Bowman clarified that her comments applied broadly to digital assets, rather than specifically to cryptocurrencies.  Lynch pressed her on the distinction between digital assets and stablecoins, and the discussion shifted. Bowman replied that Congress, through the GENIUS Act—a law regulating payment stablecoins—has authorised the Fed to develop a framework for digital asset activities. “The GENIUS Act requires us to promulgate regulations to allow these types of activities,” Bowman said. Though the price of several digital assets can be volatile, stablecoins, like those pegged to the US dollar, are generally “stable,” as the name suggests.  While there have been some occasions where some coins have depegged from their respective currencies, like the crash of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin some three years ago, the overwhelming majority of stablecoins do not fluctuate past 1% of their peg. Bowman earlier noted that staff at the Fed should be allowed to hold small “amounts of crypto or other types of digital assets” to grasp better how the technology works. FDIC prepares national stablecoin framework under GENIUS Act Travis Hill, acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was also present at Tuesday’s hearing. The government agency is one of many responsible for implementing the GENIUS Act, which US President Donald Trump signed into law in July. According to Hill, the FDIC will propose a stablecoin framework “later this month,” which will include requirements for supervising issuers. In a few weeks, the legislative Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will release its first set of proposed guidelines under the GENIUS Act. This represents a significant step forward for the US in its efforts to establish a legislative framework for stablecoins.  According to Hill, the proposal will explain how stablecoin issuers linked to FDIC-insured banks are regulated and monitored nationwide, moving away from the current system of fragmented, state-by-state monitoring. That’s only part of a broader effort by regulators to make clearer how traditional banking authorities monitor digital assets such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits. The FDIC’s plan follows President Donald Trump’s signing of a law in July that, for the first time, establishes national requirements for US stablecoins. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes the first government rules for payment stablecoins. It assigns tasks to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to ensure the law is carried out. These agencies recently informed the House Financial Services Committee about their plans. This means that the law would eliminate the need for different state systems and establish a single national standard for issuer licensing and supervision. According to the framework, federal prudential regulators will be responsible for bank-linked issuers; however, states will still be responsible for non-bank businesses unless new rules expand the federal reach.  The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation noted that the FDIC will directly oversee the subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks that want to issue stablecoins. Before a bank’s subsidiary launches a stablecoin, it must submit a formal application. The FDIC will then scrutinize the bank’s business strategies, risk management practices, and compliance procedures. The first rule this month will establish the application framework for issuers connected to banks. A second proposal, scheduled for release early next year, will establish capital, liquidity, and reserve asset norms for payment stablecoin issuers. These will be the main regulatory protections for this group. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Lawmakers slam Fed on crypto as FDIC readies stablecoin rules

US Representative Stephen Lynch challenged Federal Reserve Vice Chair Michelle Bowman on Tuesday, questioning her past statements encouraging banks to “engage fully” with digital assets.

 Lynch also inquired about the Fed’s role in advancing crypto regulatory requirements, while also highlighting confusion regarding the definition of stablecoins. 

Lynch confronts Fed on crypto oversight and stablecoin definitions

During an oversight hearing, Lynch cited Bowman’s comments at the November Santander International Banking Conference, where she expressed support for banks “[engaging] fully” with digital assets. Bowman clarified that her comments applied broadly to digital assets, rather than specifically to cryptocurrencies. 

Lynch pressed her on the distinction between digital assets and stablecoins, and the discussion shifted. Bowman replied that Congress, through the GENIUS Act—a law regulating payment stablecoins—has authorised the Fed to develop a framework for digital asset activities.

“The GENIUS Act requires us to promulgate regulations to allow these types of activities,” Bowman said.

Though the price of several digital assets can be volatile, stablecoins, like those pegged to the US dollar, are generally “stable,” as the name suggests. 

While there have been some occasions where some coins have depegged from their respective currencies, like the crash of Terra’s algorithmic stablecoin some three years ago, the overwhelming majority of stablecoins do not fluctuate past 1% of their peg.

Bowman earlier noted that staff at the Fed should be allowed to hold small “amounts of crypto or other types of digital assets” to grasp better how the technology works.

FDIC prepares national stablecoin framework under GENIUS Act

Travis Hill, acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, was also present at Tuesday’s hearing. The government agency is one of many responsible for implementing the GENIUS Act, which US President Donald Trump signed into law in July.

According to Hill, the FDIC will propose a stablecoin framework “later this month,” which will include requirements for supervising issuers.

In a few weeks, the legislative Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will release its first set of proposed guidelines under the GENIUS Act. This represents a significant step forward for the US in its efforts to establish a legislative framework for stablecoins. 

According to Hill, the proposal will explain how stablecoin issuers linked to FDIC-insured banks are regulated and monitored nationwide, moving away from the current system of fragmented, state-by-state monitoring.

That’s only part of a broader effort by regulators to make clearer how traditional banking authorities monitor digital assets such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits. The FDIC’s plan follows President Donald Trump’s signing of a law in July that, for the first time, establishes national requirements for US stablecoins.

The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US stablecoins (GENIUS) Act establishes the first government rules for payment stablecoins. It assigns tasks to the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to ensure the law is carried out.

These agencies recently informed the House Financial Services Committee about their plans. This means that the law would eliminate the need for different state systems and establish a single national standard for issuer licensing and supervision.

According to the framework, federal prudential regulators will be responsible for bank-linked issuers; however, states will still be responsible for non-bank businesses unless new rules expand the federal reach.

 The acting chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation noted that the FDIC will directly oversee the subsidiaries of FDIC-insured banks that want to issue stablecoins. Before a bank’s subsidiary launches a stablecoin, it must submit a formal application. The FDIC will then scrutinize the bank’s business strategies, risk management practices, and compliance procedures.

The first rule this month will establish the application framework for issuers connected to banks. A second proposal, scheduled for release early next year, will establish capital, liquidity, and reserve asset norms for payment stablecoin issuers. These will be the main regulatory protections for this group.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.02706
$0.02706$0.02706
+3.16%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

On January 14, 2026, Sui Mainnet faced a significant disruption, leaving the network stalled for roughly six hours. The incident was caused by an internal divergence
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/17 09:30
Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

The post Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chi Lewis-Parry and Ralph Fiennes
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 09:21
Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

BitcoinWorld Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with significant developments as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently took to Washington, D.C., advocating passionately for a clearer regulatory path. His mission? To champion the passage of a vital crypto market structure bill, specifically the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. This legislative push is not just about policy; it’s about safeguarding investor rights and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. Why a Clear Crypto Market Structure Bill is Essential Brian Armstrong’s visit underscores a growing sentiment within the crypto industry: the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Without clear guidelines, the market operates in a gray area, leaving both innovators and investors vulnerable. The proposed crypto market structure bill aims to bring much-needed definition to this dynamic sector. Armstrong explicitly stated on X that this legislation is crucial to prevent a recurrence of actions that infringe on investor rights, citing past issues with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler. This proactive approach seeks to establish a stable and predictable environment for digital assets. Understanding the CLARITY Act: A Blueprint for Digital Assets The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is designed to establish a robust regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. It seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulatory bodies, primarily the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Here are some key provisions: Clear Jurisdiction: The bill aims to specify which digital assets fall under the purview of the SEC as securities and which are considered commodities under the CFTC. Investor Protection: By defining these roles, the act intends to provide clearer rules for market participants, thereby enhancing investor protection. Exemption Conditions: A significant aspect of the bill would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from the stringent registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, provided they meet specific criteria. This could reduce regulatory burdens for legitimate projects. This comprehensive approach promises to bring structure to a rapidly evolving market. The Urgency Behind the Crypto Market Structure Bill The call for a dedicated crypto market structure bill is not new, but Armstrong’s direct engagement highlights the increasing pressure for legislative action. The lack of a clear framework has led to regulatory uncertainty, stifling innovation and sometimes leading to enforcement actions that many in the industry view as arbitrary. Passing this legislation would: Foster Innovation: Provide a clear roadmap for developers and entrepreneurs, encouraging new projects and technologies. Boost Investor Confidence: Offer greater certainty and protection for individuals investing in digital assets. Prevent Future Conflicts: Reduce the likelihood of disputes between regulatory bodies and crypto firms, creating a more harmonious ecosystem. The industry believes that a well-defined regulatory landscape is essential for the long-term health and growth of the digital economy. What a Passed Crypto Market Structure Bill Could Mean for You If the CLARITY Act or a similar crypto market structure bill passes, its impact could be profound for everyone involved in the crypto space. For investors, it could mean a more secure and transparent market. For businesses, it offers a predictable environment to build and scale. Conversely, continued regulatory ambiguity could: Stifle Growth: Drive innovation overseas and deter new entrants. Increase Risks: Leave investors exposed to unregulated practices. Create Uncertainty: Lead to ongoing legal battles and market instability. The stakes are incredibly high, making the advocacy efforts of leaders like Brian Armstrong all the more critical. The push for a clear crypto market structure bill is a pivotal moment for the digital asset industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s efforts in Washington, D.C., reflect a widespread desire for regulatory clarity that protects investors, fosters innovation, and ensures the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act offers a potential blueprint for this future, aiming to define jurisdictional boundaries and streamline regulatory requirements. Its passage could unlock significant growth and stability, cementing the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market structure bill aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It seeks to define the roles of the SEC and CFTC and exempt certain cryptocurrencies from securities registration requirements under specific conditions. Why is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocating for this bill? Brian Armstrong is advocating for the CLARITY Act to bring regulatory certainty to the crypto industry, protect investor rights from unclear enforcement actions, and foster innovation within the digital asset space. He believes it’s crucial for the industry’s sustainable growth. How would this bill impact crypto investors? For crypto investors, the passage of this crypto market structure bill would mean greater clarity on which assets are regulated by whom, potentially leading to enhanced consumer protections, reduced market uncertainty, and a more stable investment environment. What are the primary roles of the SEC and CFTC concerning this bill? The bill aims to delineate the responsibilities of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) regarding digital assets. It seeks to clarify which assets fall under securities regulation and which are considered commodities, reducing jurisdictional ambiguity. What could happen if a crypto market structure bill like CLARITY Act does not pass? If a clear crypto market structure bill does not pass, the industry may continue to face regulatory uncertainty, potentially leading to stifled innovation, increased legal challenges for crypto companies, and a less secure environment for investors due to inconsistent enforcement and unclear rules. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network to help spread awareness about the crucial discussions shaping the future of digital assets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 20:35