The post Tech giants lose second attempt to preempt state AI laws appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tech giants face their second major setback this year after lawmakers refused to use the defense bill to stop states from making and enforcing their own AI rules. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise says the defense bill is not the right place to add language that would block state AI laws. Congress says no to stopping states from making their own AI rules The tech industry attempted to use the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent states from creating their own AI regulations, but Congress has blocked their efforts. Companies like Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Andreessen Horowitz sought to have Congress enact a rule that would establish a single national AI law, superseding stricter regulations in states like California and New York. The companies said one rule will make it easier to follow the law and avoid the confusion that comes from different state rules. Lawmakers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opposed the proposal, arguing that adding a narrow AI law to a large military bill was inappropriate. This is the second time Congress has blocked similar efforts to override state AI laws, as the Senate voted 99–1 against a measure that aimed to limit state power over AI earlier this year. Most lawmakers argue that states should retain the authority to regulate AI, prioritising the protection of people over concerns about costs and differing regulations.  However, both sides of Congress say the discussions aren’t over, and lawmakers could still make a federal rule that works alongside state laws, but only if it respects states’ power and protects the public.  White House and tech leaders try to change minds, but do not get the support they want White House AI chief David Sacks spent days working with top Republican leaders in Congress and executives from some of the biggest… The post Tech giants lose second attempt to preempt state AI laws appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tech giants face their second major setback this year after lawmakers refused to use the defense bill to stop states from making and enforcing their own AI rules. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise says the defense bill is not the right place to add language that would block state AI laws. Congress says no to stopping states from making their own AI rules The tech industry attempted to use the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent states from creating their own AI regulations, but Congress has blocked their efforts. Companies like Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Andreessen Horowitz sought to have Congress enact a rule that would establish a single national AI law, superseding stricter regulations in states like California and New York. The companies said one rule will make it easier to follow the law and avoid the confusion that comes from different state rules. Lawmakers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opposed the proposal, arguing that adding a narrow AI law to a large military bill was inappropriate. This is the second time Congress has blocked similar efforts to override state AI laws, as the Senate voted 99–1 against a measure that aimed to limit state power over AI earlier this year. Most lawmakers argue that states should retain the authority to regulate AI, prioritising the protection of people over concerns about costs and differing regulations.  However, both sides of Congress say the discussions aren’t over, and lawmakers could still make a federal rule that works alongside state laws, but only if it respects states’ power and protects the public.  White House and tech leaders try to change minds, but do not get the support they want White House AI chief David Sacks spent days working with top Republican leaders in Congress and executives from some of the biggest…

Tech giants lose second attempt to preempt state AI laws

Tech giants face their second major setback this year after lawmakers refused to use the defense bill to stop states from making and enforcing their own AI rules.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise says the defense bill is not the right place to add language that would block state AI laws.

Congress says no to stopping states from making their own AI rules

The tech industry attempted to use the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent states from creating their own AI regulations, but Congress has blocked their efforts. Companies like Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Andreessen Horowitz sought to have Congress enact a rule that would establish a single national AI law, superseding stricter regulations in states like California and New York. The companies said one rule will make it easier to follow the law and avoid the confusion that comes from different state rules.

Lawmakers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opposed the proposal, arguing that adding a narrow AI law to a large military bill was inappropriate.

This is the second time Congress has blocked similar efforts to override state AI laws, as the Senate voted 99–1 against a measure that aimed to limit state power over AI earlier this year. Most lawmakers argue that states should retain the authority to regulate AI, prioritising the protection of people over concerns about costs and differing regulations. 

However, both sides of Congress say the discussions aren’t over, and lawmakers could still make a federal rule that works alongside state laws, but only if it respects states’ power and protects the public. 

White House and tech leaders try to change minds, but do not get the support they want

White House AI chief David Sacks spent days working with top Republican leaders in Congress and executives from some of the biggest AI companies in the United States. He and his team said a single national rule for AI will make it easier for companies to follow the law, boost innovations, and prevent countries like China from getting ahead of the U.S.

However, lawmakers disagreed, arguing that states must retain the power to hold companies accountable if AI products cause harm. Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the White House attempted to find a middle ground. Still, Congress was unwilling to grant tech companies a broad exemption or weaken state authority in any way.

President Donald Trump publicly asked Congress to block state-level AI rules, stating that using preemption language in the defense bill would protect U.S. companies and help them compete globally. However, even with the commander-in-chief and big tech companies working hand in hand to push the bill, Congress remained unswayed. Many lawmakers on the Armed Services Committee said the pleading parties rushed the decision and that it isn’t right for a bill focused on national defense. They warned that adding an AI law, which most AI companies are pushing for, to the defense bill would threaten the safety of citizens, workers, and communities. 

Tech companies are expected to continue pushing next year, as they believe the political situation will shift in their favor. States can still create and enforce their own AI rules that companies must follow. This goes to show just how strong a decision from Congress can be even when the White House, big tech, and whole presidents stand against it. 

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/tech-lose-attempt-to-preempt-state-ai-laws/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
XRP Treasury Firm Evernorth Prepares Public Listing to Boost Institutional Exposure

XRP Treasury Firm Evernorth Prepares Public Listing to Boost Institutional Exposure

Evernorth is working toward a Q1 Nasdaq listing through a SPAC merger, giving XRP exposure to Wall Street investors. Funds raised will be used to back DeFi products
Share
Crypto News Flash2026/01/17 20:01
XRP Treasury Firm Evernorth Prepares Public Listing

XRP Treasury Firm Evernorth Prepares Public Listing

The post XRP Treasury Firm Evernorth Prepares Public Listing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kelvin is a crypto journalist/editor with over six years of experience
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 20:13