Civil society groups are concerned that a ‘meaningful’ consultation process has not yet taken place despite the delay in submission of the updated NDC to the United NationsCivil society groups are concerned that a ‘meaningful’ consultation process has not yet taken place despite the delay in submission of the updated NDC to the United Nations

Corruption a threat to Philippines’ higher climate ambition – groups

2025/12/04 11:45
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

MANILA, Philippines – As the Philippine government proposes higher climate targets, groups warn that corruption can threaten the country’s capacity to implement programs needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The Philippines is proposing an unconditional target of between 10% to 20% — much higher than the 2.71% stated in the country’s current Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC).

The new target was presented to civil society groups on Wednesday, December 3, in a high-level plenary session. Even before the annual climate talks in Brazil took place, groups Rappler talked to had already complained about the lack of consultations on the new NDC.

“With a likely higher cost of implementation for the updated NDC to match the higher ambition, there is simply no room for any errors, especially those caused by corruption or inaction,” Aksyon Klima Pilipinas national coordinator John Leo Algo said in a statement Wednesday.

Countries like the Philippines that are party to the Paris Agreement are required to submit NDCs, or pledges on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Back in 2021, the Philippines pledged to reduce carbon emissions by 75% — 2.71% is unconditional and 72.29% is conditional. Parties are supposed to submit to the United Nations their revised targets early 2025.

Raising unconditional targets would mean mobilizing more national resources. Conditional targets, meanwhile, are reliant on the support that the Philippines will get from the international community.

“Any commitment like the NDC is only as good as its implementation,” said Algo.

Despite the Philippines’ delayed timeline in submission, think-tank Center for Energy, Ecology, and Development (CEED) said the government has not made use of the time to have a “meaningful” consultation process. CEED was one of the groups present at the consultation arranged by the Philippine government on Wednesday.

CEED is concerned that the 2025 NDC is slated for submission to the Office of the President by December without providing civil society the full draft as well as the analyses behind the new targets.

“Government agencies must be transparent and genuinely inclusive if we are to have an NDC that is truly backed by the people,” said CEED deputy executive director Avril de Torres.

AKP pointed out that the government agencies making the 2025 NDC cannot expect “meaningful feedback” if they are not given enough time to examine the new pledges.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Climate Change Commission lead this process while the Department of Economy, Planning, and Development and the Department of Finance act as oversight agencies.

“In this regard, the government comes up short in ensuring an inclusive, bottom-up approach to this crucial part of finalizing the NDC,” Algo said.

So far, 122 parties have submitted their new NDCs to the United Nations. Parties are supposed to submit a revised NDC every five years, showing a progression in climate ambition. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0,0003683
$0,0003683$0,0003683
+2,27%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitcoin ETFs Surge with 20,685 BTC Inflows, Marking Strongest Week

Bitcoin ETFs Surge with 20,685 BTC Inflows, Marking Strongest Week

TLDR Bitcoin ETFs recorded their strongest weekly inflows since July, reaching 20,685 BTC. U.S. Bitcoin ETFs contributed nearly 97% of the total inflows last week. The surge in Bitcoin ETF inflows pushed holdings to a new high of 1.32 million BTC. Fidelity’s FBTC product accounted for 36% of the total inflows, marking an 18-month high. [...] The post Bitcoin ETFs Surge with 20,685 BTC Inflows, Marking Strongest Week appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 02:30
Today’s NYT Pips Hints And Solutions For Thursday, September 18th

Today’s NYT Pips Hints And Solutions For Thursday, September 18th

The post Today’s NYT Pips Hints And Solutions For Thursday, September 18th appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. It’s Thursday and I am incredibly sore and tired after really hitting the weights and the yoga mat hard this week. Sore is good! It takes pain to reduce pain, or at least that’s my experience with exercise. We must exercise our minds as well, and what better way to do that than with a fun puzzle game about placing dominoes in the correct tiles. Come along, my Pipsqueaks, let’s solve today’s Pips! Looking for Wednesday’s Pips? Read our guide right here. How To Play Pips In Pips, you have a grid of multicolored boxes. Each colored area represents a different “condition” that you have to achieve. You have a select number of dominoes that you have to spend filling in the grid. You must use every domino and achieve every condition properly to win. There are Easy, Medium and Difficult tiers. Here’s an example of a difficult tier Pips: Pips example Screenshot: Erik Kain As you can see, the grid has a bunch of symbols and numbers with each color. On the far left, the three purple squares must not equal one another (hence the equal sign crossed out). The two pink squares next to that must equal a total of 0. The zig-zagging blue squares all must equal one another. You click on dominoes to rotate them, and will need to since they have to be rotated to fit where they belong. Not shown on this grid are other conditions, such as “less than” or “greater than.” If there are multiple tiles with > or < signs, the total of those tiles must be greater or less than the listed number. It varies by grid. Blank spaces can have anything. The various possible conditions are: = All pips must equal one another in this group. ≠ All pips…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:59
Vitalik Buterin to Ethereum Developers: Build It Like It Has to Last Without You

Vitalik Buterin to Ethereum Developers: Build It Like It Has to Last Without You

Key Takeaways Vitalik Buterin wants Ethereum apps built to survive without developers, corporate servers, or trusted third parties Two major […] The post Vitalik
Share
Coindoo2026/03/07 15:49