The post EU fines Elon Musk’s X $140M for misleading users appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Elon Musk’s social media company X (formerly Twitter) has been fined 120 million euros ($140 million) by EU tech regulators. The EU claims that the platform breached its online content rules. According to the EU, under the Digital Services Act, X mislead verified blue checkmarks that deceive users on account authenticity and provide insufficient data access for researchers. This stems from an investigation into X’s compliance with DSA transparency rules two years ago. EU says that DSA has nothing to do with censorship The bloc’s tech regulator claims that users could be duped into thinking the identity of those with blue tick marks was verified, when in fact anybody can pay for a blue tick. It said it had found evidence of malicious actors abusing the system. On the other hand, the billionaire, who bought the platform for $44 billion in 2022, said the DSA rules amounted to censored speech, which he said he found unacceptable. In response to Musk’s charge of censorship, the commission said that its rules were aimed at ensuring “a safe and fair online environment for European citizens that is respectful of their rights, in particular freedom of expression”. Among its rules, it said, are requirements that companies inform users when their accounts are restricted and that users who are banned can contest those decisions. Additionally, the Commission said its review of X had found a lack of transparency around advertising and that X did not provide data for research use as required under EU rules. “In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service”, the Commission stated. The European Commission’s tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, said X’s fine was proportionate and calculated based on the nature of the infringements, their gravity in… The post EU fines Elon Musk’s X $140M for misleading users appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Elon Musk’s social media company X (formerly Twitter) has been fined 120 million euros ($140 million) by EU tech regulators. The EU claims that the platform breached its online content rules. According to the EU, under the Digital Services Act, X mislead verified blue checkmarks that deceive users on account authenticity and provide insufficient data access for researchers. This stems from an investigation into X’s compliance with DSA transparency rules two years ago. EU says that DSA has nothing to do with censorship The bloc’s tech regulator claims that users could be duped into thinking the identity of those with blue tick marks was verified, when in fact anybody can pay for a blue tick. It said it had found evidence of malicious actors abusing the system. On the other hand, the billionaire, who bought the platform for $44 billion in 2022, said the DSA rules amounted to censored speech, which he said he found unacceptable. In response to Musk’s charge of censorship, the commission said that its rules were aimed at ensuring “a safe and fair online environment for European citizens that is respectful of their rights, in particular freedom of expression”. Among its rules, it said, are requirements that companies inform users when their accounts are restricted and that users who are banned can contest those decisions. Additionally, the Commission said its review of X had found a lack of transparency around advertising and that X did not provide data for research use as required under EU rules. “In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service”, the Commission stated. The European Commission’s tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, said X’s fine was proportionate and calculated based on the nature of the infringements, their gravity in…

EU fines Elon Musk’s X $140M for misleading users

2025/12/06 00:30

Elon Musk’s social media company X (formerly Twitter) has been fined 120 million euros ($140 million) by EU tech regulators. The EU claims that the platform breached its online content rules.

According to the EU, under the Digital Services Act, X mislead verified blue checkmarks that deceive users on account authenticity and provide insufficient data access for researchers. This stems from an investigation into X’s compliance with DSA transparency rules two years ago.

EU says that DSA has nothing to do with censorship

The bloc’s tech regulator claims that users could be duped into thinking the identity of those with blue tick marks was verified, when in fact anybody can pay for a blue tick. It said it had found evidence of malicious actors abusing the system.

On the other hand, the billionaire, who bought the platform for $44 billion in 2022, said the DSA rules amounted to censored speech, which he said he found unacceptable.

In response to Musk’s charge of censorship, the commission said that its rules were aimed at ensuring “a safe and fair online environment for European citizens that is respectful of their rights, in particular freedom of expression”.

Among its rules, it said, are requirements that companies inform users when their accounts are restricted and that users who are banned can contest those decisions.

Additionally, the Commission said its review of X had found a lack of transparency around advertising and that X did not provide data for research use as required under EU rules. “In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service”, the Commission stated.

The European Commission’s tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, said X’s fine was proportionate and calculated based on the nature of the infringements, their gravity in terms of the affected EU users, and their duration. 

Under the DSA, which took effect two years ago, the bloc can impose fines of up to 6% of online platforms’ yearly global revenue for failing to tackle illegal content and disinformation, or for not following transparency rules.

“We are not here to impose the highest fines. We are here to make sure that our digital legislation is enforced, and if you comply with our rules, you don’t get a fine. And it’s as simple as that,” she stated, “I think it’s very important to underline that DSA is having nothing to do with censorship.” 

The penalty aligns with the EU’s ongoing enforcement against big tech, including prior fines on Meta and Apple. This is pressuring X to potentially overhaul its premium subscription model amid low initial post engagement of 16 likes.

JD Vance asks the EU to support free speech

Besides X, the EU’s investigation has extended to other US companies. Earlier this year, the EU fined Apple and Meta a combined 700 million euros for breaching the bloc’s landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA).

As reported by Cryptopolitan, Apple was hit with a € 500 million ($570 million) penalty for restricting how app developers communicate with users about alternative sales and offers. Meta, on the other hand, was fined € 200 million (approximately $230 million) for its controversial “pay or consent” model. It forces users in the EU to either pay for ad-free access to Facebook and Instagram or consent to targeted advertising.

Europe’s crackdown on big tech has been interpreted as a way to ensure smaller rivals can compete, and consumers have more choice. This has been criticised by the administration of US President Donald Trump, which says it singles out American companies and censors Americans. 

Before the announcement of the fine, the US Vice President JD Vance said, “The EU should be supporting free speech, not attacking American companies over garbage.”

However, the EU’s executive said that its laws do not target any nationality and that it is merely defending its digital and democratic standards, which usually serve as the benchmark for the rest of the world. 

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community – limited to 1,000 members.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/eu-fines-elon-musks-x-140m/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Metaplanet 50M Bitcoin Loan and BTC Relief Rally

Metaplanet 50M Bitcoin Loan and BTC Relief Rally

The post Metaplanet 50M Bitcoin Loan and BTC Relief Rally appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Metaplanet has secured a 50 million dollar loan using its Bitcoin holdings as collateral to fund new BTC purchases and income products. At the same time, chartist Titan of Crypto says Bitcoin’s price action continues to track a earlier relief rally fractal on the two day chart. Metaplanet secured a 50 million dollar loan backed by its existing Bitcoin holdings, according to a new disclosure shared today. The company said the funds will support additional Bitcoin purchases and expand its Bitcoin-based income operations as part of its ongoing treasury strategy. The filing shows that Metaplanet pledged part of its current holdings to obtain the loan instead of issuing new equity or bonds. This structure allows the firm to raise capital while keeping its Bitcoin position intact. It also signals that the company continues to lean heavily on Bitcoin as both a reserve asset and a financing tool. The move follows a series of Bitcoin-focused initiatives from Metaplanet, including earlier bond issuances and ongoing accumulation programs. Today’s loan marks the latest step in that strategy as the company increases leverage to expand its holdings. Analyst Sees Bitcoin Still Following Earlier Cycle Fractal Meanwhile, Crypto chartist Titan of Crypto says Bitcoin’s latest pullback still fits the “relief rally” fractal he has been tracking on the two-day chart. In a new update, he compares the current structure to the 2021–2022 cycle, highlighting a similar sequence of a local peak, a sharp drop into a demand zone, and then a rebound. Bitcoin Relief Rally Fractal Roadmap. Source: Titan of Crypto and TradingView In the chart, Bitcoin’s price action forms a pattern that mirrors the earlier cycle, with a shaded support area marking the zone where the last major relief rally started. An accompanying momentum oscillator also shows a repeat of lower highs on price…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 01:14