The post Galaxy Says Crypto DAT Firms Are Entering A “Darwinian Phase” As Premiums Expire appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin treasury firms have entered a Darwinian phase as equity premiums collapse, leverage turns risky, and survival depends on liquidity.   Bitcoin treasury firms have moved into a so-called “Darwinian phase” after equity premiums collapsed across the board.  This trend has changed how these companies grow, borrow and survive. Once easy gains disappeared, risk rose fast. As of writing, Bitcoin treasury firms now face a strict test of balance sheets and strategy. Bitcoin Treasury Firms Enter Darwinian Phase Bitcoin treasury firms built their model on a simple idea. Most of them started out with their stock trading above the value of their Bitcoin holdings. That gap allowed them to issue new shares and buy more Bitcoin, and this worked well while prices climbed. That cycle has now reversed. Bitcoin fell from near $126,000 in October to lows near $80,000. Liquidity dropped, risk appetite weakened and on October 10, a major deleveraging event wiped out large futures positions.  Market depth fell and issuance stopped working as a growth tool. DATs have suffered stronger drawdowns than Bitcoin itself | source: Galaxy Digital Galaxy Research described this period as a Darwinian phase. So far, DAT survival now depends on discipline and liquidity. Bitcoin Treasury Firms See Stocks Flip to Discounts Bitcoin treasury firms once traded at strong premiums, which created a powerful flywheel of growth. Now, most of these stocks trade at discounts to the Bitcoin they hold. Companies like Metaplanet and Nakamoto show this clearly. Both companies bought large amounts of Bitcoin near market highs. As of writing, their average entry price sits above $107,000.  Now with Bitcoin well below that level, unrealised losses keep rising. Metaplanet’s unrealised PnL has declined | source: Galaxy Digital NAKA stock dropped more than 98% from its peak, and that level of decline matches wipeouts seen… The post Galaxy Says Crypto DAT Firms Are Entering A “Darwinian Phase” As Premiums Expire appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin treasury firms have entered a Darwinian phase as equity premiums collapse, leverage turns risky, and survival depends on liquidity.   Bitcoin treasury firms have moved into a so-called “Darwinian phase” after equity premiums collapsed across the board.  This trend has changed how these companies grow, borrow and survive. Once easy gains disappeared, risk rose fast. As of writing, Bitcoin treasury firms now face a strict test of balance sheets and strategy. Bitcoin Treasury Firms Enter Darwinian Phase Bitcoin treasury firms built their model on a simple idea. Most of them started out with their stock trading above the value of their Bitcoin holdings. That gap allowed them to issue new shares and buy more Bitcoin, and this worked well while prices climbed. That cycle has now reversed. Bitcoin fell from near $126,000 in October to lows near $80,000. Liquidity dropped, risk appetite weakened and on October 10, a major deleveraging event wiped out large futures positions.  Market depth fell and issuance stopped working as a growth tool. DATs have suffered stronger drawdowns than Bitcoin itself | source: Galaxy Digital Galaxy Research described this period as a Darwinian phase. So far, DAT survival now depends on discipline and liquidity. Bitcoin Treasury Firms See Stocks Flip to Discounts Bitcoin treasury firms once traded at strong premiums, which created a powerful flywheel of growth. Now, most of these stocks trade at discounts to the Bitcoin they hold. Companies like Metaplanet and Nakamoto show this clearly. Both companies bought large amounts of Bitcoin near market highs. As of writing, their average entry price sits above $107,000.  Now with Bitcoin well below that level, unrealised losses keep rising. Metaplanet’s unrealised PnL has declined | source: Galaxy Digital NAKA stock dropped more than 98% from its peak, and that level of decline matches wipeouts seen…

Galaxy Says Crypto DAT Firms Are Entering A “Darwinian Phase” As Premiums Expire

2025/12/06 20:37

Bitcoin treasury firms have entered a Darwinian phase as equity premiums collapse, leverage turns risky, and survival depends on liquidity.

Bitcoin treasury firms have moved into a so-called “Darwinian phase” after equity premiums collapsed across the board. 

This trend has changed how these companies grow, borrow and survive. Once easy gains disappeared, risk rose fast. As of writing, Bitcoin treasury firms now face a strict test of balance sheets and strategy.

Bitcoin Treasury Firms Enter Darwinian Phase

Bitcoin treasury firms built their model on a simple idea. Most of them started out with their stock trading above the value of their Bitcoin holdings. That gap allowed them to issue new shares and buy more Bitcoin, and this worked well while prices climbed.

That cycle has now reversed. Bitcoin fell from near $126,000 in October to lows near $80,000. Liquidity dropped, risk appetite weakened and on October 10, a major deleveraging event wiped out large futures positions. 

Market depth fell and issuance stopped working as a growth tool.

DATs have suffered stronger drawdowns than Bitcoin itself | source: Galaxy Digital

Galaxy Research described this period as a Darwinian phase. So far, DAT survival now depends on discipline and liquidity.

Bitcoin Treasury Firms See Stocks Flip to Discounts

Bitcoin treasury firms once traded at strong premiums, which created a powerful flywheel of growth. Now, most of these stocks trade at discounts to the Bitcoin they hold.

Companies like Metaplanet and Nakamoto show this clearly. Both companies bought large amounts of Bitcoin near market highs. As of writing, their average entry price sits above $107,000. 

Now with Bitcoin well below that level, unrealised losses keep rising.

Metaplanet’s unrealised PnL has declined | source: Galaxy Digital

NAKA stock dropped more than 98% from its peak, and that level of decline matches wipeouts seen in risky token markets. 

This event hit harder because Bitcoin itself fell only about 30%, while Bitcoin treasury firms declined much more.

Why the Bitcoin Treasury Firms Model Broke

Bitcoin treasury firms operate like liquidity derivatives. The model depends on stock trading above net asset value, and when that premium holds, the company can issue shares and buy more Bitcoin without hurting existing owners.

Once stock falls below asset value, issuance becomes harmful. Each new share reduces the Bitcoin per share and growth turns into dilution.

Lower Bitcoin price triggered a lower net asset value and equity premiums compressed across the board. Issuance stopped helping, and the loop flipped.

Galaxy Research warned about this pattern months before it happened. And as of writing, the prediction has proved itself correct.

Related Reading: Strategy’s Bitcoin Buys Have Slowed Down Amid Bear Market Jitters

Drawdowns Reveal the Depth of the Problem

Drawdowns across major Bitcoin treasury firms currently show clear stress. Companies like Strategy, Metaplanet, Semler Scientific and Nakamoto all suffered large declines.

Metaplanet once showed more than $600 million in unrealized gains, but that number has swung to around $530 million in unrealised losses. 

In all, Bitcoin treasury firms no longer represent pure upside trades. Instead, they now behave more like complex instruments and each move depends on how and when managers acted.

Investors are now studying balance sheets more closely. Liquidity buffers attract attention, while debt levels raise caution.

This being said, the Darwinian phase will not end quickly. Soft market conditions could last months, and only companies that planned ahead will stay steady.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/galaxy-says-crypto-dat-firms-are-entering-a-darwinian-phase-as-premiums-expire/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40