Downside liquidity clusters near $140 suggest volatility ahead as Solana (SOL) trades around $132 after a 16% monthly drop. The post Solana Liquidity Reset: Treasury Firm Reveals No New SOL Purchases, Will Prices Recover? appeared first on Coinspeaker.Downside liquidity clusters near $140 suggest volatility ahead as Solana (SOL) trades around $132 after a 16% monthly drop. The post Solana Liquidity Reset: Treasury Firm Reveals No New SOL Purchases, Will Prices Recover? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Solana Liquidity Reset: Treasury Firm Reveals No New SOL Purchases, Will Prices Recover?

2025/12/06 19:48

DeFi Development Corp (DFDV), the Nasdaq firm built to accumulate Solana (SOL), said in its November update that it made no new SOL purchases through the month. Its total SOL reserve held steady at 2,195,926, valued at about $293.2 million.

As per the announcement, the supply locked in its dfdvSOL product stood at 530,286.72. DFDV also said that Q3 unrealized gains surpassed $74 million with an 11.4% return from SOL operations.

DFDV SOL statistics | Source: DFDV

DFDV SOL statistics | Source: DFDV

Senior executives Parker White and Dan Kang said that the company took advantage of the market pullback by buying DFDV shares from the open market.

Treasury Data Shows Strength

DFDV’s full recap placed focus on its latest SEC filing, revenue of $4.6 million, and on-chain yield generation supported by validator work and DeFi deployments.

The firm said its Solana per share ratio stood at 0.0700 at month‑end, with 31.39 million shares in circulation. It also noted that warrant trading under ticker DFDVW now gives holders optional upside exposure tied to future treasury growth.

DFDV signed a Letter of Intent with Loopscale to add stablecoin yield tactics beyond staking. The step aims to expand its capital‑efficiency model during a period when broader Solana liquidity sits near reset levels.

Liquidity Cycle Mirrors Past Bottom Phases

Altcoin Vector said that Solana is now under a full liquidity reset that resembles the base‑building phases of earlier cycles. Its liquidity index chart shows sharp resets followed by ignition periods that triggered multi‑week upward trends.

The firm said that forced seller pressure appears near completion and that the ecosystem is cleaning out internal excess before a new cycle forms.

If the pattern mirrors the April setup, liquidity ignition may form within four weeks, placing early January as a possible turn point. However, the firm said a quicker shift remains possible.

Downside Liquidity Clusters Form Near $140

Analyst Ted Pillows said that most of the downside liquidity beneath SOL has been taken. His heatmap shows stacked liquidity around the $140 level, a zone he said is likely to be cleared next.

Such moves often accompany volatility spikes before trend direction becomes clear. The broader market backdrop has kept SOL under pressure, with the token trading near $132 at press time.

While prices have dropped more than 16% in the past month, analysts maintain that SOL remains one of the best crypto to buy in 2025.

next

The post Solana Liquidity Reset: Treasury Firm Reveals No New SOL Purchases, Will Prices Recover? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40