The post Apple, Google, Samsung defend Indian smartphone users from state surveillance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. India’s telecom industry has presented a proposal requesting that smartphone companies enable satellite location tracking that users can not turn off. The implementation of the proposal involves using A-GPS technology, which functions with both satellite signals and cellular data. The Indian government is considering a telecom industry proposal that would require all smartphones to have satellite-based location tracking permanently enabled, with no option for users to turn it off. Apple and Google reject India’s telecom industry proposal   The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel presented the proposal. According to Reuters, referencing to internal government emails from June, telecom companies want precise user locations provided through A-GPS technology, which uses both satellite signals and cellular data and can allow tracking accurate to within about one meter.  Currently, authorities can only use cellular tower data that can only estimate location within several meters.  India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government was forced to withdraw an order requiring all smartphones to come with a state-run cyber safety app already installed on it, with no option to delete it. However, activists and politicians raised alarms about potential government snooping, which led to the policy’s quick reversal, according to reporting by Cryptopolitan. Apple, Samsung, and Google also told the Indian government not to force the installation of the app. The India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), representing both Apple and Google, sent a confidential letter to authorities in July arguing that the proposal has no precedent anywhere in the world and would constitute “regulatory overreach.” The tech companies stated that A-GPS network services are “not deployed or supported for location surveillance” in their letter. They warned of significant “legal, privacy, and national security concerns,” noting their user base includes military personnel, judges, corporate executives, and journalists who… The post Apple, Google, Samsung defend Indian smartphone users from state surveillance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. India’s telecom industry has presented a proposal requesting that smartphone companies enable satellite location tracking that users can not turn off. The implementation of the proposal involves using A-GPS technology, which functions with both satellite signals and cellular data. The Indian government is considering a telecom industry proposal that would require all smartphones to have satellite-based location tracking permanently enabled, with no option for users to turn it off. Apple and Google reject India’s telecom industry proposal   The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel presented the proposal. According to Reuters, referencing to internal government emails from June, telecom companies want precise user locations provided through A-GPS technology, which uses both satellite signals and cellular data and can allow tracking accurate to within about one meter.  Currently, authorities can only use cellular tower data that can only estimate location within several meters.  India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government was forced to withdraw an order requiring all smartphones to come with a state-run cyber safety app already installed on it, with no option to delete it. However, activists and politicians raised alarms about potential government snooping, which led to the policy’s quick reversal, according to reporting by Cryptopolitan. Apple, Samsung, and Google also told the Indian government not to force the installation of the app. The India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), representing both Apple and Google, sent a confidential letter to authorities in July arguing that the proposal has no precedent anywhere in the world and would constitute “regulatory overreach.” The tech companies stated that A-GPS network services are “not deployed or supported for location surveillance” in their letter. They warned of significant “legal, privacy, and national security concerns,” noting their user base includes military personnel, judges, corporate executives, and journalists who…

Apple, Google, Samsung defend Indian smartphone users from state surveillance

2025/12/06 22:39

India’s telecom industry has presented a proposal requesting that smartphone companies enable satellite location tracking that users can not turn off. The implementation of the proposal involves using A-GPS technology, which functions with both satellite signals and cellular data.

The Indian government is considering a telecom industry proposal that would require all smartphones to have satellite-based location tracking permanently enabled, with no option for users to turn it off.

Apple and Google reject India’s telecom industry proposal  

The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), representing major carriers like Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel presented the proposal.

According to Reuters, referencing to internal government emails from June, telecom companies want precise user locations provided through A-GPS technology, which uses both satellite signals and cellular data and can allow tracking accurate to within about one meter. 

Currently, authorities can only use cellular tower data that can only estimate location within several meters. 

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government was forced to withdraw an order requiring all smartphones to come with a state-run cyber safety app already installed on it, with no option to delete it. However, activists and politicians raised alarms about potential government snooping, which led to the policy’s quick reversal, according to reporting by Cryptopolitan.

Apple, Samsung, and Google also told the Indian government not to force the installation of the app. The India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), representing both Apple and Google, sent a confidential letter to authorities in July arguing that the proposal has no precedent anywhere in the world and would constitute “regulatory overreach.”

The tech companies stated that A-GPS network services are “not deployed or supported for location surveillance” in their letter. They warned of significant “legal, privacy, and national security concerns,” noting their user base includes military personnel, judges, corporate executives, and journalists who handle sensitive information. 

Permanently enabled location tracking could compromise their security.

“This proposal would see phones operate as a dedicated surveillance device,” Digital forensics expert, Junade Ali, from Britain’s Institution of Engineering and Technology, said. 

Cooper Quintin, a security researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, called the idea “pretty horrifying” and said he had not heard of any similar proposal elsewhere.

Apple recently sent cyber threat notifications to users in 84 countries on December 2, warning them they may have been targeted by state-backed hackers. Apple has now notified users in over 150 countries about potential surveillance threats. 

Why do India’s telecom companies want this change? 

India’s Modi administration has expressed frustration for years that government agencies cannot obtain precise locations when making legal requests to telecom firms during investigations. The current cellular tower system can only provide estimated area locations, which are less efficient for surveillance operations.

Smartphone makers worsen the issue by displaying pop-up messages alerting users that “your carrier is trying to access your location.” 

The COAI believes the message alerts the target to the fact that they are being tracked by security agencies. The telecom group is urging the government to order phone makers to disable these notification features entirely.

Apple and Google’s lobby group argued in their July letter that these notifications “ensure transparency and user control over their location.”

India’s home ministry scheduled a meeting with top smartphone industry executives for Friday to discuss the matter, but it was postponed. At this point, no policy decision has been made by India’s IT or home ministries. 

India is the world’s second-largest mobile market and had 735 million smartphones as of mid-2025. Google’s Android powers more than 95% of these devices, with Apple’s iOS accounting for the remainder. Any policy decision would affect hundreds of millions of users and set a potential precedent for government surveillance capabilities worldwide.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community – limited to 1,000 members.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/defending-india-users-from-surveillance/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40