The post Do Kwon Faces 12-Year Sentencing Request After Terraform’s Collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. prosecutors have recommended a 12-year prison sentence for Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon, arguing that the financial damage linked to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem exceeds the combined losses seen in the cases of Sam Bankman-Fried, Alex Mashinsky, and Carl Sebastian Greenwood. The request was submitted to the New York District Court four months after Kwon pleaded guilty to two fraud charges. Prosecutors insist that his actions not only accelerated Terraform’s downfall but also contributed to the broader onset of the “crypto winter.” They also called for full forfeiture of any income tied to his conduct. Defense Seeks Leniency as Global Legal Pressures Mount Kwon was indicted in the United States in 2023 on charges that included securities fraud and money laundering. After Terra’s collapse, he went into hiding before being arrested in Montenegro on unrelated offenses and later extradited to the U.S. Now, the court must determine his final sentence. Judges are not bound by the prosecution’s request — meaning the punishment could be shorter or significantly longer than 12 years. Defense Cites Harsh Consequences in South Korea Kwon’s legal team is pushing for a sentence of no more than five years, arguing that once his U.S. sentence is served, he will be deported directly to South Korea, where he faces up to 40 years in prison. They emphasize that Kwon will not be eligible for release between the two proceedings. When determining his punishment, the judge will weigh both sides’ arguments and compare similar cases. Sam Bankman-Fried: 25 years Alex Mashinsky: 12 years Carl Sebastian Greenwood: 20 years for OneCoin As reported earlier, Bankman-Fried has claimed that his own case involved judicial bias and has requested a review. The final sentencing of Do Kwon is expected to set one of the most significant precedents in crypto-related… The post Do Kwon Faces 12-Year Sentencing Request After Terraform’s Collapse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. prosecutors have recommended a 12-year prison sentence for Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon, arguing that the financial damage linked to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem exceeds the combined losses seen in the cases of Sam Bankman-Fried, Alex Mashinsky, and Carl Sebastian Greenwood. The request was submitted to the New York District Court four months after Kwon pleaded guilty to two fraud charges. Prosecutors insist that his actions not only accelerated Terraform’s downfall but also contributed to the broader onset of the “crypto winter.” They also called for full forfeiture of any income tied to his conduct. Defense Seeks Leniency as Global Legal Pressures Mount Kwon was indicted in the United States in 2023 on charges that included securities fraud and money laundering. After Terra’s collapse, he went into hiding before being arrested in Montenegro on unrelated offenses and later extradited to the U.S. Now, the court must determine his final sentence. Judges are not bound by the prosecution’s request — meaning the punishment could be shorter or significantly longer than 12 years. Defense Cites Harsh Consequences in South Korea Kwon’s legal team is pushing for a sentence of no more than five years, arguing that once his U.S. sentence is served, he will be deported directly to South Korea, where he faces up to 40 years in prison. They emphasize that Kwon will not be eligible for release between the two proceedings. When determining his punishment, the judge will weigh both sides’ arguments and compare similar cases. Sam Bankman-Fried: 25 years Alex Mashinsky: 12 years Carl Sebastian Greenwood: 20 years for OneCoin As reported earlier, Bankman-Fried has claimed that his own case involved judicial bias and has requested a review. The final sentencing of Do Kwon is expected to set one of the most significant precedents in crypto-related…

Do Kwon Faces 12-Year Sentencing Request After Terraform’s Collapse

2025/12/06 22:26

U.S. prosecutors have recommended a 12-year prison sentence for Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon, arguing that the financial damage linked to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem exceeds the combined losses seen in the cases of Sam Bankman-Fried, Alex Mashinsky, and Carl Sebastian Greenwood.

The request was submitted to the New York District Court four months after Kwon pleaded guilty to two fraud charges. Prosecutors insist that his actions not only accelerated Terraform’s downfall but also contributed to the broader onset of the “crypto winter.”

They also called for full forfeiture of any income tied to his conduct.

Defense Seeks Leniency as Global Legal Pressures Mount

Kwon was indicted in the United States in 2023 on charges that included securities fraud and money laundering. After Terra’s collapse, he went into hiding before being arrested in Montenegro on unrelated offenses and later extradited to the U.S.

Now, the court must determine his final sentence. Judges are not bound by the prosecution’s request — meaning the punishment could be shorter or significantly longer than 12 years.

Defense Cites Harsh Consequences in South Korea

Kwon’s legal team is pushing for a sentence of no more than five years, arguing that once his U.S. sentence is served, he will be deported directly to South Korea, where he faces up to 40 years in prison. They emphasize that Kwon will not be eligible for release between the two proceedings.

When determining his punishment, the judge will weigh both sides’ arguments and compare similar cases.

  • Sam Bankman-Fried: 25 years
  • Alex Mashinsky: 12 years
  • Carl Sebastian Greenwood: 20 years for OneCoin

As reported earlier, Bankman-Fried has claimed that his own case involved judicial bias and has requested a review.

The final sentencing of Do Kwon is expected to set one of the most significant precedents in crypto-related criminal cases.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/12914/prosecutors-push-for-12-years-as-do-kwon-faces-his-toughest-judgment

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40