The real question, they argue, is far more fundamental: What exactly is Bitcoin supposed to be in a portfolio? Bitcoin’s […] The post Bitcoin’s Biggest Problem Isn’t Its Price – It’s Its Purpose appeared first on Coindoo.The real question, they argue, is far more fundamental: What exactly is Bitcoin supposed to be in a portfolio? Bitcoin’s […] The post Bitcoin’s Biggest Problem Isn’t Its Price – It’s Its Purpose appeared first on Coindoo.

Bitcoin’s Biggest Problem Isn’t Its Price – It’s Its Purpose

2025/12/07 23:21

The real question, they argue, is far more fundamental: What exactly is Bitcoin supposed to be in a portfolio?

Bitcoin’s steep reversal from its peak this year has reignited that discussion, forcing investors to re-evaluate assumptions that many had treated as settled.

Key Takeaways
  • Bitcoin’s pullback has forced analysts to revisit the question of whether it truly behaves like a store of value.
  • Nate Geraci says Bitcoin has shown conflicting behavior during market stress and needs much more time to mature.
  • Most crypto assets continue to trade like high-risk tech plays, leaving Bitcoin in a category of its own.

A Store of Value — or Just Another Risk Asset?

For more than a decade, Bitcoin supporters have pitched it as a digital alternative to gold. The comparison is appealing: gold protects portfolios when markets fall, and its behavior is mostly independent from stocks. Bitcoin, in theory, should eventually behave the same way.

But practice hasn’t matched the narrative.

Nate Geraci, who heads NovaDius Wealth Management, says the crypto market still doesn’t have clear evidence that Bitcoin can fill that role. Speaking on CNBC’s “ETF Edge,” he explained that Bitcoin has shown moments of independence, but those moments have been inconsistent and short-lived.

The issue isn’t price performance, he said — it’s reliability.

Two Very Different Stress Tests Produced Two Opposite Results

Geraci points back to the spring, when President Donald Trump’s announcement of sweeping global tariffs triggered a sharp equity sell-off. During that event — quickly nicknamed the “tariff tantrum” — Bitcoin rose instead of falling. That brief decoupling attracted attention because it looked like Bitcoin was finally behaving like a defensive asset.

But the pattern didn’t hold.

When tech stocks slumped months later, Bitcoin fell even harder than the equity market. Instead of being a safe-haven, it behaved like a high-volatility growth asset. According to Geraci, these contradictions make it difficult to argue that Bitcoin has fully stepped into the “digital gold” role investors want it to play.

A Teenager in Asset-Class Terms

The long-term view, Geraci says, requires patience.

Gold’s reputation was built over thousands of years; Bitcoin has existed for barely half a generation. Comparing the two today, he argues, is like comparing a high school student to a seasoned adult.

He believes that as the market matures — through broader ownership, deeper liquidity, and repeated macro cycles — Bitcoin could eventually settle into a more stable behavioral pattern. But for now, it is still too young, too reactive, and too intertwined with risk assets to be considered a true store of value.

Volatility Remains Part of the Story

The past few months illustrate that point clearly. Since October’s peak, Bitcoin has dropped more than 25%, and measuring from high to low, the drawdown approaches 35%. Yet despite that tumble, Bitcoin is still more than double its value from early 2024 — a reminder of how wild its performance can be on both ends of the spectrum.

READ MORE:

Cardano News: Input Output Moves Into New Tech Sectors

Part of the recent sell-off came from extremely stretched positioning. Leverage had built up throughout the year, and Geraci believes the latest correction was partly “a cleansing event” that flushed out excess risk.

Meanwhile, spot Bitcoin ETFs have pulled in roughly $22 billion year to date, even after several weeks of outflows — another sign that institutional interest hasn’t disappeared, even if conviction is being tested.

Why Bitcoin Stands Alone in the Crypto Asset Class

Geraci also distinguishes Bitcoin from the rest of the market.

While he sees potential for broad crypto-index ETFs — products that spread exposure across many tokens — he argues that most crypto assets behave nothing like gold and nothing like Bitcoin. Their price action looks far more similar to high-growth tech stocks whose futures depend on adoption curves: stablecoins, tokenized assets, decentralized finance, and other emerging use cases.

In that sense, Bitcoin may eventually be the only cryptocurrency to graduate into the “store of value” category, while everything else follows a growth-asset trajectory.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Bitcoin’s Biggest Problem Isn’t Its Price – It’s Its Purpose appeared first on Coindoo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case

The post House Judiciary Rejects Vote To Subpoena Banks CEOs For Epstein Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline House Judiciary Committee Republicans blocked a Democrat effort Wednesday to subpoena a group of major banks as part of a renewed investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties. Congressman Jim Jordan, R-OH, is the chairman of the committee. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images Key Facts A near party-line vote squashed the effort to vote on a subpoena, with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is leading a separate effort to force the Justice Department to release more Epstein case materials, voting alongside Democrats. The vote, if successful, would have resulted in the issuing of subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing and Bank of New York Mellon CEO Robin Vince. The subpoenas would have specifically looked into multiple reports that claimed the four banks flagged $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein. The failed effort from Democrats followed an FBI oversight hearing in which agency director Kash Patel misleadingly claimed the FBI cannot release many of the files it has on Epstein. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Crucial Quote Dimon, who attended a lunch with Senate Republicans before the vote, according to Politico, told reporters, “We regret any association with that man at all. And, of course, if it’s a legal requirement, we would conform to it. We have no issue with that.” Chief Critic “Republicans had the chance to subpoena the CEOs of JPMorgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of New York Mellon to expose Epstein’s money trail,” the House Judiciary Democrats said in a tweet. “Instead, they tried to bury…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:02
Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over

Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over

The post Standard Chartered: Bitcoin Halving Cycles Are Over appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Banking giant Standard Chartered believes that Bitcoin’s four-year cycles are already over.  Historically, Bitcoin price movements have been strongly tied to “halving” events (when the block reward for mining Bitcoin is cut in half, roughly every 4 years). Typically, prices would peak about 18 months after a halving. However, Standard Chartered argues that this old logic no longer reliably predicts price cycles following the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S.  The rationale is that ETFs make Bitcoin more accessible to mainstream investors. For this new dynamic to be proven, BTC would need to break its current all-time high of $126,000. They expect this breakout could happen in the first half of 2026.  Standard Chartered has also lowered its BTC price predictions for the following years (from $200,000 to $100,000 in 2025, from $300,000 to $200,000 in 2026, from $400,000 to $225,000 in 2027, and from $500,000 to $300,000).  You Might Also Like Bitcoin is currently changing hands at $90,397, according to CoinGecko data.  On the same page  Apart from Standard Chartered, there are quite a few analysts and market watchers who argue that the traditional Bitcoin halving cycle is no longer relevant.  In a recent research note, Bernstein analysts assert that the traditional four‑year halving cycle is effectively over due to Bitcoin ETFs dominating the scene. CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju also claims that the flagship cryptocurrency no longer follows four-year cycles, citing institutional buying power.  That said, it remains to be seen whether BTC will be able to reclaim its current all-time high next year.  Source: https://u.today/standard-chartered-bitcoin-halving-cycles-are-over
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 02:46