Rogelio Singson has resigned from the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), the independent body created by President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr., tasked with investigating anomalous infrastructure projects over the past 10 years.Rogelio Singson has resigned from the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), the independent body created by President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr., tasked with investigating anomalous infrastructure projects over the past 10 years.

A flurry of resignations

“Stressed Singson quits ICI,” the Philippine Star headlined on Dec. 4.

Rogelio Singson has resigned from the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), the independent body created by President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr., tasked with investigating anomalous infrastructure projects over the past 10 years. “As a former Public Works secretary, he has a good idea of where the bodies are buried,” Mr. Marcos said of Singson in September. “That will give us an immediate advantage when the commission is doing this.”

In mid-September, Mr. Marcos created the ICI and appointed Mr. Singson, who had served as the secretary of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) from 2010 to 2016 under the late former President Benigno Simeon Aquino III, and SGV Country Managing Partner Rossana Fajardo as members, and retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Andres Reyes, Jr. as chair. Baguio Mayor Benjamin Magalong was the special adviser and investigator to the Commission. The ICI took over the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee’s initially assumed lead role in investigating the infrastructure projects — which were suspected of being anomalous — that exacerbated the damage of the unabating typhoons of the season.

At his fourth State of the Nation Address on July 28, President Marcos Jr. criticized corruption in flood control projects, revealing that a preliminary probe had found a small number of contractors had monopolized over P100 billion in contracts. Public outrage rose over the worst-ever systemic corruption that engulfed the country. Reported anomalies in flood control projects, including incomplete or substandard work and alleged ghost projects, unleashed widespread angry criticism of the government. Public discontent escalated calls for transparency and accountability, demanding the incarceration of the corrupt and the restitution of stolen wealth to the people.

Amidst the mounting public panic, political overlays on the investigative spadework built up conspiracy theories cemented by misleading inputs from suspects and even among the investigators themselves. The livestreamed Senate Blue Ribbon Committee hearings that first interrogated the contractors and DPWH personnel suspected of participating in, or orchestrating the infrastructure project scams unabashedly bared the opposing political factions in the Blue Ribbon that pushed discussions to a blame game.

On Oct. 6, Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” Lacson resigned as Blue Ribbon committee chairman, citing the dissatisfaction of fellow senators on the “direction” of the legislative inquiry on the alleged anomalous flood control projects for his resignation. GMA News aired Mr. Lacson’s gripe that some senators “publicly and secretly pursue the narrative that [he is] zeroing in on several of my colleagues while purportedly protecting those members of the Lower House perceived to be the principal actors in the budget anomalies related to the substandard and ghost flood control projects.”

Okay lang, because just when the Senate Blue Ribbon had lost its glam (because of the political infighting), the “independent” ICI that President Marcos Jr. envisioned was establishing itself as the true, the one and only, investigator for the flood control projects, with recommendatory powers to the Ombudsman, who would have the final say on those who should face the justice system.

The politics of the ICI seemed to have been balanced: Mr. Singson was President Aquino III’s DPWH Secretary; Andres Reyes, Jr. was appointed Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeals (2010-2017) by then-President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, then Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (2017-2020) by then-President Rodrigo Duterte; Rosanna Fajardo had just been appointed country managing partner on July 1 this year by Sycip, Gorres, Velayo & Co. (SGV), “the largest multidisciplinary professional services firm in the country since 1946.” Mayor Benjamin Magalong’s immediate previous appointment was by then-President Duterte to the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF-EID), after his retirement from the Philippine National Police (PNP) as Deputy Chief of Operations in 2016.

But why did Mr. Magalong resign from the ICI on Sept. 26, after just 11 days on the job? He was doing very well, going around the provinces, inspecting and pointing out on live news, unfinished but fully paid-for infrastructure projects, substandard and ghost projects which were also fully paid to that select group of some 15 favored contractors already identified in previous Blue Ribbon hearings and initial ICI panels. Was he over-zealous and too “OC” (obsessive-compulsive) in the performance of his job? Was he a publicity freak?

Mr. Magalong said he resigned as a special adviser to the ICI following the remarks of Palace press officer Clare Castro at a press conference on Sept. 26: “Magalong was designated as a special adviser and not lead investigator or in any other form of investigator, while reminding him that he holds no authority over the Philippine National Police or the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group.” It was also insinuated that since Mr. Magalong was holding two concurrent official positions — mayor of Baguio City and chief security adviser to the ICI — did he have enough time and energy so that one job would not suffer less attention and care than the other? “I can blend both jobs,” Mr. Magalong said.

A news item said Mr. Magalong was “insulted” that Malacañang ordered a review of his appointment following questions over a possible conflict of interest — St. Gerrard Construction, owned by contractors Curlee and Sarah Discaya, who were under investigation, built the controversial P110-million tennis court and parking facility at the Baguio Athletics Bowl, a project that faced issues like water leaks, flooding, delays, and questions about its bidding and completion. But Mr. Magalong had questioned the independence of the commission after irregular transactions in his city’s public works surfaced amid the ICI probe, the Inquirer pointed out on Dec. 4.

Mr. Magalong’s exit was controversial, as he was believed to have “struck some nerves” during his two-week tenure at the commission, philstar.com noted. On the other hand, Mr. Singson’s resignation was hard to fathom.

When Mr. Singson announced his resignation from the ICI, the Makabayan bloc questioned the president’s seriousness in investigating and punishing those involved in the flood control mess. “What prompted Singson’s resignation? Did he encounter political interference in the investigation? Was he prevented from going after the big fish? What really transpired inside the ICI?” ACT Teachers party-list Rep. Antonio Tinio, Gabriela Women’s Party Rep. Sarah Elago, and Kabataan party-list Rep. Renee Louise Co said in a joint statement.

ICI chair Andres Reyes, Jr. hastily proffered “health reasons” to explain the ICI “star player’s” sudden exit. Mr. Singson said at a press conference on Dec. 4 that his “resignation was not because he no longer hoped to serve the commission, but because the work’s stress had led to multiple hospital visits and medical conditions he never had before.”

According to DPWH Secretary Vince Dizon, Mr. Singson resigned because he would like to be involved directly in the implementation of DPWH projects, specifically in the “80 major river system master plan” that he started during his term as DPWH secretary under President Aquino. The DPWH is now working closely and cooperatively with the local government units (the mayors) on projects for the LGUs (The Financial Express, Dec. 3).

Mr. Singson took the opportunity to air his “last wishes” before officially leaving the ICI on Dec. 15. Beyond his current health issues, he said the body still has a long way to go in effectively investigating flood control anomalies and corruption among high-ranking officials. Without more powers like the ability to subpoena, the ICI has no legal ammunition to compel important resource persons to testify.

“The burden of this project cannot rely solely on ICI. We need the strong support of the Office of the President. We need the strong support from both houses of Congress, otherwise, on its own, without the necessary powers, [the investigation] won’t move as fast as we want to,” Mr. Singson said, urging lawmakers to pass the measure strengthening the ICI before the year ends (philstar.com, Dec. 4).

“What a waste, he’s very credible. Sad and unfortunate,” Mr. Magalong lamented. Mr. Singson’s resignation comes as the public remains ambivalent toward the commission. A WR Numero survey released yesterday found that 37% trust the commission, while 32% do not (Ibid.).

Rep. Leila de Lima (ML Party-list) called Mr. Singson’s resignation “a major blow” to the effort to strengthen the independent body and ensure a transparent and comprehensive investigation into the corruption scandal hounding infrastructure projects. His resignation should give the president even more reason to certify the Independent Commission Against Infrastructure Corruption (ICAIC) bill as urgent, which House Speaker Bojie Dy already promised to prioritize before the year ends (Ibid.)

House Bill Nos. 4453 and 5699, currently pending in the House of Representatives of the Philippines, both aim to establish an ICAIC. The goal of these bills is to grant more authority to the existing ICI to investigate and prosecute corruption in flood control and other infrastructure projects.

What’s keeping our leaders and lawmakers from doing the right things to truly stop systemic corruption that thrives with impunity in our ravaged country? Enough with competitive politics and the insatiable greed of those in power.

It looks bad that the few good men in government are resigning, giving up on our country…

Amelia H. C. Ylagan is a Doctor of Business Administration from the University of the Philippines.

[email protected]

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94%

Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94%

BitcoinWorld Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94% The financial world is buzzing with a significant development: the probability of a Fed rate cut in October has just seen a dramatic increase. This isn’t just a minor shift; it’s a monumental change that could ripple through global markets, including the dynamic cryptocurrency space. For anyone tracking economic indicators and their impact on investments, this update from the U.S. interest rate futures market is absolutely crucial. What Just Happened? Unpacking the FOMC Statement’s Impact Following the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement, market sentiment has decisively shifted. Before the announcement, the U.S. interest rate futures market had priced in a 71.6% chance of an October rate cut. However, after the statement, this figure surged to an astounding 94%. This jump indicates that traders and analysts are now overwhelmingly confident that the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates next month. Such a high probability suggests a strong consensus emerging from the Fed’s latest communications and economic outlook. A Fed rate cut typically means cheaper borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, which can stimulate economic activity. But what does this really signify for investors, especially those in the digital asset realm? Why is a Fed Rate Cut So Significant for Markets? When the Federal Reserve adjusts interest rates, it sends powerful signals across the entire financial ecosystem. A rate cut generally implies a more accommodative monetary policy, often enacted to boost economic growth or combat deflationary pressures. Impact on Traditional Markets: Stocks: Lower interest rates can make borrowing cheaper for companies, potentially boosting earnings and making stocks more attractive compared to bonds. Bonds: Existing bonds with higher yields might become more valuable, but new bonds will likely offer lower returns. Dollar Strength: A rate cut can weaken the U.S. dollar, making exports cheaper and potentially benefiting multinational corporations. Potential for Cryptocurrency Markets: The cryptocurrency market, while often seen as uncorrelated, can still react significantly to macro-economic shifts. A Fed rate cut could be interpreted as: Increased Risk Appetite: With traditional investments offering lower returns, investors might seek higher-yielding or more volatile assets like cryptocurrencies. Inflation Hedge Narrative: If rate cuts are perceived as a precursor to inflation, assets like Bitcoin, often dubbed “digital gold,” could gain traction as an inflation hedge. Liquidity Influx: A more accommodative monetary environment generally means more liquidity in the financial system, some of which could flow into digital assets. Looking Ahead: What Could This Mean for Your Portfolio? While the 94% probability for a Fed rate cut in October is compelling, it’s essential to consider the nuances. Market probabilities can shift, and the Fed’s ultimate decision will depend on incoming economic data. Actionable Insights: Stay Informed: Continue to monitor economic reports, inflation data, and future Fed statements. Diversify: A diversified portfolio can help mitigate risks associated with sudden market shifts. Assess Risk Tolerance: Understand how a potential rate cut might affect your specific investments and adjust your strategy accordingly. This increased likelihood of a Fed rate cut presents both opportunities and challenges. It underscores the interconnectedness of traditional finance and the emerging digital asset space. Investors should remain vigilant and prepared for potential volatility. The financial landscape is always evolving, and the significant surge in the probability of an October Fed rate cut is a clear signal of impending change. From stimulating economic growth to potentially fueling interest in digital assets, the implications are vast. Staying informed and strategically positioned will be key as we approach this crucial decision point. The market is now almost certain of a rate cut, and understanding its potential ripple effects is paramount for every investor. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)? A1: The FOMC is the monetary policymaking body of the Federal Reserve System. It sets the federal funds rate, which influences other interest rates and economic conditions. Q2: How does a Fed rate cut impact the U.S. dollar? A2: A rate cut typically makes the U.S. dollar less attractive to foreign investors seeking higher returns, potentially leading to a weakening of the dollar against other currencies. Q3: Why might a Fed rate cut be good for cryptocurrency? A3: Lower interest rates can reduce the appeal of traditional investments, encouraging investors to seek higher returns in alternative assets like cryptocurrencies. It can also be seen as a sign of increased liquidity or potential inflation, benefiting assets like Bitcoin. Q4: Is a 94% probability a guarantee of a rate cut? A4: While a 94% probability is very high, it is not a guarantee. Market probabilities reflect current sentiment and data, but the Federal Reserve’s final decision will depend on all available economic information leading up to their meeting. Q5: What should investors do in response to this news? A5: Investors should stay informed about economic developments, review their portfolio diversification, and assess their risk tolerance. Consider how potential changes in interest rates might affect different asset classes and adjust strategies as needed. Did you find this analysis helpful? Share this article with your network to keep others informed about the potential impact of the upcoming Fed rate cut and its implications for the financial markets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94% first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:25
Jett Nisay, endorser of Marcos impeach complaint, is a public works contractor

Jett Nisay, endorser of Marcos impeach complaint, is a public works contractor

Nisay is also among the 215 lawmakers who backed Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment in 2025
Share
Rappler2026/01/19 11:06
Trump's Greenland Acquisition Odds Swell On Crypto Prediction Market In 2026 As Dispute Grows Into Potential US-EU Flashpoint

Trump's Greenland Acquisition Odds Swell On Crypto Prediction Market In 2026 As Dispute Grows Into Potential US-EU Flashpoint

The odds that the U.S. takes control of Greenland have spiked on prediction markets since the year began as President Donald Trump intensifies push to annex the
Share
Coinstats2026/01/19 11:06