Tokenisation can lower barriers to owning assets like New York real estate, but it does little to fix how hard those assets are to sell, according to Securitize co-founder and CEO Carlos Domingo. Speaking in an interview, Domingo said early experiments with tokenised real-world assets showed that putting assets on-chain does not change their basic […] The post Securitize CEO: Tokenisation Doesn’t Magically Make Illiquid Assets Liquid appeared first on Crypto News Australia.Tokenisation can lower barriers to owning assets like New York real estate, but it does little to fix how hard those assets are to sell, according to Securitize co-founder and CEO Carlos Domingo. Speaking in an interview, Domingo said early experiments with tokenised real-world assets showed that putting assets on-chain does not change their basic […] The post Securitize CEO: Tokenisation Doesn’t Magically Make Illiquid Assets Liquid appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Securitize CEO: Tokenisation Doesn’t Magically Make Illiquid Assets Liquid

2025/12/08 13:36
  • Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo stated that tokenisation does not magically make illiquid assets liquid, as the underlying market profile of the asset remains the same.
  • He stressed that providing liquidity is as important as accessibility, noting that tokenising illiquid assets failed to create liquidity as many investors had assumed.
  • Domingo called stablecoins the “most successful” use case of tokenisation, as they apply blockchain rails to assets (like cash) that are already highly liquid.

Tokenisation can lower barriers to owning assets like New York real estate, but it does little to fix how hard those assets are to sell, according to Securitize co-founder and CEO Carlos Domingo.

Speaking in an interview, Domingo said early experiments with tokenised real-world assets showed that putting assets on-chain does not change their basic market profile. If the underlying asset is hard to trade quickly without taking a large discount, the tokenised version will behave the same way.

“Providing liquidity to the asset class is as important as providing accessibility,” he said, adding that many investors assumed tokenisation would automatically turn illiquid assets into liquid ones. “That didn’t happen, because an illiquid asset is illiquid whether you tokenize it or not.”

Read more: Ripple CEO Predicts Bitcoin Will Hit $180K by 2026, Citing Regulatory Momentum

Stablecoins as the “Most Successful” Use Case of Tokenisation

Domingo said the industry has responded by shifting away from illiquid markets and toward assets that are already easy to trade, such as cash and US Treasuries. In his view, the most successful tokenisation use case so far is the US dollar in the form of stablecoins, where blockchain rails amplify existing liquidity instead of trying to create it from scratch.

Tokenisation is the process of turning real-world assets (RWAs) into a digital token, giving certain benefits like fragmented ownership, higher liquidity, and lowering the barriers to entry for markets.

Recently, in a SEC Investor Advisory Committee meeting, tokenisation was the main topic among crypto founders and Wall Street executives, including BlackRock and Citadel. They discussed how tokenisation should be regulated and help the SEC to build proper frameworks for this particular sector of the industry.

Related: Ethereum’s Fusaka Upgrade Goes Live, Ushering In Next Phase of Network Scaling


Interestingly, an October report by Standard Chartered projected tokenised RWAs to climb from US$35 billion (AU$54.2 billion) today to over US$2 trillion (AU$3.1 trillion) by 2028. 

The post Securitize CEO: Tokenisation Doesn’t Magically Make Illiquid Assets Liquid appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The post The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. From encrypted chats to decentralized messaging Encrypted messengers are having a second wave. Apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Signal made end-to-end encryption (E2EE) a default expectation. But most still hinge on phone numbers, centralized servers and a lot of metadata, such as who you talk to, when, from which IP and on which device. That is what Vitalik Buterin is aiming at in his recent X post and donation. He argues the next steps for secure messaging are permissionless account creation with no phone numbers or Know Your Customer (KYC) and much stronger metadata privacy. In that context he highlighted Session and SimpleX and sent 128 Ether (ETH) to each to keep pushing in that direction. Session is a good case study because it tries to combine E2E encryption with decentralization. There is no central message server, traffic is routed through onion paths, and user IDs are keys instead of phone numbers. Did you know? Forty-three percent of people who use public WiFi report experiencing a data breach, with man-in-the-middle attacks and packet sniffing against unencrypted traffic among the most common causes. How Session stores your messages Session is built around public key identities. When you sign up, the app generates a keypair locally and derives a Session ID from it with no phone number or email required. Messages travel through a network of service nodes using onion routing so that no single node can see both the sender and the recipient. (You can see your message’s node path in the settings.) For asynchronous delivery when you are offline, messages are stored in small groups of nodes called “swarms.” Each Session ID is mapped to a specific swarm, and your messages are stored there encrypted until your client fetches them. Historically, messages had a default time-to-live of about two weeks…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:40