The post Supreme Court Hears Case On Trump Firing Officials Today—What To Know. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will consider Monday whether to give President Donald Trump increased power to fire federal officials as it hears oral arguments in a landmark case that could overturn a 90-year-old precedent. President Donald Trump receives the FIFA Peace Prize at John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on December 5 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Court will hear oral arguments Monday in Trump v. Slaughter, a case that challenges Trump’s firing of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and more broadly asks the court to reconsider its precedent in the 1935 ruling Humphrey’s Executor v. United States. In Humphrey’s Executor, the Supreme Court ruled presidents can only fire federal executives who serve on independent boards—like the Federal Trade Commission—for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” and do not serve at the pleasure of the president. Trump has repeatedly challenged that precedent in his second term, firing Slaughter and numerous other independent board members at the National Labor Relations Board, Merit Systems Protection Board and Consumer Product Safety Commission, among others. The court will decide whether to keep the Humphrey’s Executor precedent and restrict Trump’s ability to fire officials, or overturn it and give Trump more authority. Trump has also asked the Supreme Court to rule that presidents can fire officials without court interference, meaning if Trump fires someone in the future, it could not be challenged in court and the president’s decisions would have to stand. What To Watch For Hints on Monday on how the court will rule. Justices will hear oral arguments and will rule in the coming months, sometime before their term ends in late June 2026. The court has previously blocked a court ruling against Slaughter’s firing, meaning she cannot serve as a Federal Trade Commissioner while the… The post Supreme Court Hears Case On Trump Firing Officials Today—What To Know. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Supreme Court will consider Monday whether to give President Donald Trump increased power to fire federal officials as it hears oral arguments in a landmark case that could overturn a 90-year-old precedent. President Donald Trump receives the FIFA Peace Prize at John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on December 5 in Washington, DC. Getty Images Key Facts The Court will hear oral arguments Monday in Trump v. Slaughter, a case that challenges Trump’s firing of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and more broadly asks the court to reconsider its precedent in the 1935 ruling Humphrey’s Executor v. United States. In Humphrey’s Executor, the Supreme Court ruled presidents can only fire federal executives who serve on independent boards—like the Federal Trade Commission—for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” and do not serve at the pleasure of the president. Trump has repeatedly challenged that precedent in his second term, firing Slaughter and numerous other independent board members at the National Labor Relations Board, Merit Systems Protection Board and Consumer Product Safety Commission, among others. The court will decide whether to keep the Humphrey’s Executor precedent and restrict Trump’s ability to fire officials, or overturn it and give Trump more authority. Trump has also asked the Supreme Court to rule that presidents can fire officials without court interference, meaning if Trump fires someone in the future, it could not be challenged in court and the president’s decisions would have to stand. What To Watch For Hints on Monday on how the court will rule. Justices will hear oral arguments and will rule in the coming months, sometime before their term ends in late June 2026. The court has previously blocked a court ruling against Slaughter’s firing, meaning she cannot serve as a Federal Trade Commissioner while the…

Supreme Court Hears Case On Trump Firing Officials Today—What To Know.

2025/12/09 00:02

Topline

The Supreme Court will consider Monday whether to give President Donald Trump increased power to fire federal officials as it hears oral arguments in a landmark case that could overturn a 90-year-old precedent.

President Donald Trump receives the FIFA Peace Prize at John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on December 5 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images

Key Facts

The Court will hear oral arguments Monday in Trump v. Slaughter, a case that challenges Trump’s firing of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and more broadly asks the court to reconsider its precedent in the 1935 ruling Humphrey’s Executor v. United States.

In Humphrey’s Executor, the Supreme Court ruled presidents can only fire federal executives who serve on independent boards—like the Federal Trade Commission—for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office,” and do not serve at the pleasure of the president.

Trump has repeatedly challenged that precedent in his second term, firing Slaughter and numerous other independent board members at the National Labor Relations Board, Merit Systems Protection Board and Consumer Product Safety Commission, among others.

The court will decide whether to keep the Humphrey’s Executor precedent and restrict Trump’s ability to fire officials, or overturn it and give Trump more authority.

Trump has also asked the Supreme Court to rule that presidents can fire officials without court interference, meaning if Trump fires someone in the future, it could not be challenged in court and the president’s decisions would have to stand.

What To Watch For

Hints on Monday on how the court will rule. Justices will hear oral arguments and will rule in the coming months, sometime before their term ends in late June 2026. The court has previously blocked a court ruling against Slaughter’s firing, meaning she cannot serve as a Federal Trade Commissioner while the court deliberates.

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/08/should-trump-have-more-power-to-fire-federal-officials-supreme-court-hears-issue/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

The post “I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “I am NOT building a new financial system. I built a casino.”This stark admission from Ken Chan, former co-founder of derivatives protocol Aevo, has been reverberating across Asian crypto communities this week. What began as a post on X has now crossed linguistic borders, been introduced to Chinese communities by local news media, and been widely shared among Korean traders, accumulating millions of views along the way. Sponsored Sponsored From Ayn Rand to Disillusionment: A Libertarian’s Journey Through Crypto Chan’s confession is not merely a critique—it is the unraveling of a personal ideology. He describes himself as a “starry-eyed libertarian” who donated to Gary Johnson’s 2016 presidential campaign after being radicalized by Ayn Rand’s novels. The cypherpunk ethos of Bitcoin spoke directly to this worldview. “Being able to walk across the border with a billion dollars in your head is and always will be a powerful idea to me,” he writes. Yet eight years of industry experience eroded that idealism. Chan recounts how the Layer 1 wars—the flood of capital into Aptos, Sui, Sei, ICP, and countless others—produced no meaningful progress toward a new financial system. Instead, it “literally torched everyone’s money” in pursuit of becoming the next Solana. His verdict is unsparing: “We do not need to build the Casino on Mars.” According to his LinkedIn profile, Chan departed Aevo in May this year. His personal website indicates he is now working on KENSAT, a personal satellite project. It is scheduled to launch aboard a Falcon 9 in June 2026. His confession arrives six months after his departure. It comes as AEVO token trades at roughly $45 million in fully diluted market cap—down approximately 99% from its peak. Chan’s central metaphor—that crypto has become “the biggest, online, multi-player 24/7 casino our generation has ever concocted”—cuts through technical complexity with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 11:04