The global non-fungible token market is currently facing its toughest times since the beginning of the year. In recent days, non-fungible tokens have fallen to [...]The global non-fungible token market is currently facing its toughest times since the beginning of the year. In recent days, non-fungible tokens have fallen to [...]

Saylor Proposes Bitcoin-Backed Banking Products That Could Attract $50T As Strategy Buys $962M BTC

2025/12/09 13:45

Strategy Executive Chairman Michal Saylor has proposed the creation of Bitcoin-backed digital banking products that could attract up to $50 trillion as his firm buys another $962 million worth of BTC.

That’s as Bitcoin slipped more than 1% in the past 24 hours to trade at $89,907.39 as of 1:08 a.m. EST, according to data from CoinMarketCap. 

Bitcoin-Backed Digital Banking System Could Offer Clients Higher Yields

Speaking at the Bitcoin MENA event in Abu Dhabi, Saylor said that countries could use overcollateralized BTC reserves and tokenized credit instruments to create regulated digital bank accounts, which he says will be able to offer higher yields than traditional deposits. 

The Strategy Executive Chairman noted that bank deposits in Japan, Switzerland, and Europe offer little to no yield to account holders. Meanwhile, euro money-market funds pay roughly 150 basis points, and US money-market rates are closer to 400 basis points, he added. 

Saylor argued that those low yields are the reason investors are turning to the corporate bond market, which he says wouldn’t even exist if “people weren’t disgusted with their bank account.” 

He went on to outline a structure in which digital credit instruments make up roughly 80% of a fund, combined with 20% in fiat currency and a 10% reserve buffer to help reduce volatility. 

Saylor said that if such a product were offered through a regulated entity, depositors may end up sending billions of dollars to institutions to get access to the higher yields on offer. 

Should a country offer such an account, Saylor predicted that the move could lead to “$20 trillion or $50 trillion” in capital flows. He also argued that a nation adopting the model could see it become the “digital banking capital of the world.” 

Proposed BTC-Backed Accounts Mirror Strategy’s Own Offerings

Saylor’s pitch of a high-yield, low-volatility digital bank product is similar to some of Strategy’s own offerings. 

In July, the company introduced its STRC offering, which is a money-market-style preferred share with a variable dividend rate of approximately 10%.

While the product has grown to about $2.9 billion in market cap, it has been met with some skepticism.

That’s mainly because Bitcoin’s unpredictable short-term volatility has led to questions around the viability of BTC-backed, high-yield credit instruments. 

Strategy Adds More BTC To Its Reserves

Strategy is the largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally. The company started purchasing BTC back in 2020 as part of a digital asset treasury plan. Over the years, the firm has consistently added BTC to its reserves.

Strategy’s most recent purchase was announced yesterday. Saylor said on X that his company bought 10,624 BTC for around $962.7 million last week. 

The latest Bitcoin buy has pushed the company’s reserves to 660,624 BTC, data from Bitcoin Treasuries shows. 

Strategy BTC holdings (Source: Bitcoin Treasuries)

Strategy’s continued BTC accumulation comes even as the company’s share price has traded in a downtrend in recent months. Data from Google Finance shows that Strategy’s stock (MSTR) has plummeted more than 53% in the past six months. 

The company also faces a potential removal from MSCI, which could trigger billion-dollar outflows for MSTR, analysts warn. A decision will be made on Jan. 15.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch

Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch

The post Vitalik Buterin Suggests Ethereum Security Intact Amid Recent Glitch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum remains secure despite a recent network glitch caused by a Prysm client bug that temporarily halted block finalization. Vitalik Buterin emphasized that this does not undermine the network’s core security, as blocks continue to be produced and executed, behaving like Bitcoin’s probabilistic model during such pauses. Vitalik Buterin assures that temporary loss of finality does not compromise Ethereum’s overall security model. The glitch primarily impacted secondary systems like bridges and Layer 2 solutions, not the base chain. Experts compare Ethereum’s response to Bitcoin’s, where probabilistic finality prevents chain rewrites while allowing continued operations. Ethereum secure despite recent glitch: Vitalik Buterin explains why the network’s resilience shines through temporary finality pauses. Discover key insights on blockchain reliability. Stay informed on crypto updates—read more now. What Did Vitalik Buterin Say About Ethereum’s Security After the Recent Glitch? Ethereum remains secure even amid the recent network disruption, according to Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder. He clarified that the Prysm client bug, which briefly interrupted block finalization, does not pose a threat to the protocol’s integrity. Instead, it highlights the network’s design for graceful degradation, where core functions persist without deterministic certainty. How Does Ethereum Behave During Finality Pauses? During the incident, Ethereum temporarily shifted to a probabilistic security model similar to Bitcoin’s, as noted by blockchain researchers. Fabrizio Romano Genovese, an Oxford PhD and Ethereum protocol specialist, explained that many blockchains, including Bitcoin, rely on growing difficulty in rewriting history rather than instant finality. In Ethereum’s case, blocks kept being created and executed, preventing any chain halt, though secondary services like cross-chain bridges experienced delays. This behavior underscores the network’s robustness, with no risk of approving incorrect transaction histories. Genovese added that such events reveal the need for better fallback mechanisms in dependent infrastructure, ensuring smoother operations in future occurrences. Statistics from the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 16:40