The post OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. national banks have been passed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to enable their customers perform instant crypto trades with no risk. This decision has cleared a significant obstacle in the way of banks that desire to be part of the expanding digital assets market. Banks Receive Clarity on Crypto Trading Authority  Interpretive Letter 1188 states that a bank can be an intermediary in crypto transactions without having digital assets in its possession. The OCC clarified that one client may sell a crypto asset to one bank and that bank will sell the asset to the other client at the same time. Since the two trades take place virtually at the same time the bank does not have an exposure to the market. The license provides banks with a regulated structure to provide crypto trading services. This is in line with preceding actions like enabling banks to hold major crypto assets. Another explanation that OCC provides is that the role of the bank is not to trade digital assets. Instead, the only responsibility of the bank is linking the sellers and the buyers. OCC Reinforces Bank’s Crypto Oversight The regulator mentioned that such transactions carry a limited amount of settlement risk. The decision is an update of a previous guidance that permitted crypto custody and some stablecoin transactions. The latest clarification strengthens the same allowances but indicates continued regulation of responsible crypto services in the banking space. With this, the banks are now enabled to provide customers with a secure means of accessing digital assets in compliance with federal regulations. The OCC stressed that institutions need to continue having robust risk controls, such as cybersecurity controls and compliance programs. Hence, all their operations can be safe and in line with current rules. How Institutions Might… The post OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. national banks have been passed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to enable their customers perform instant crypto trades with no risk. This decision has cleared a significant obstacle in the way of banks that desire to be part of the expanding digital assets market. Banks Receive Clarity on Crypto Trading Authority  Interpretive Letter 1188 states that a bank can be an intermediary in crypto transactions without having digital assets in its possession. The OCC clarified that one client may sell a crypto asset to one bank and that bank will sell the asset to the other client at the same time. Since the two trades take place virtually at the same time the bank does not have an exposure to the market. The license provides banks with a regulated structure to provide crypto trading services. This is in line with preceding actions like enabling banks to hold major crypto assets. Another explanation that OCC provides is that the role of the bank is not to trade digital assets. Instead, the only responsibility of the bank is linking the sellers and the buyers. OCC Reinforces Bank’s Crypto Oversight The regulator mentioned that such transactions carry a limited amount of settlement risk. The decision is an update of a previous guidance that permitted crypto custody and some stablecoin transactions. The latest clarification strengthens the same allowances but indicates continued regulation of responsible crypto services in the banking space. With this, the banks are now enabled to provide customers with a secure means of accessing digital assets in compliance with federal regulations. The OCC stressed that institutions need to continue having robust risk controls, such as cybersecurity controls and compliance programs. Hence, all their operations can be safe and in line with current rules. How Institutions Might…

OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions

2025/12/10 07:46

U.S. national banks have been passed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to enable their customers perform instant crypto trades with no risk. This decision has cleared a significant obstacle in the way of banks that desire to be part of the expanding digital assets market.

Banks Receive Clarity on Crypto Trading Authority 

Interpretive Letter 1188 states that a bank can be an intermediary in crypto transactions without having digital assets in its possession. The OCC clarified that one client may sell a crypto asset to one bank and that bank will sell the asset to the other client at the same time.

Since the two trades take place virtually at the same time the bank does not have an exposure to the market. The license provides banks with a regulated structure to provide crypto trading services. This is in line with preceding actions like enabling banks to hold major crypto assets.

Another explanation that OCC provides is that the role of the bank is not to trade digital assets. Instead, the only responsibility of the bank is linking the sellers and the buyers.

OCC Reinforces Bank’s Crypto Oversight

The regulator mentioned that such transactions carry a limited amount of settlement risk. The decision is an update of a previous guidance that permitted crypto custody and some stablecoin transactions.

The latest clarification strengthens the same allowances but indicates continued regulation of responsible crypto services in the banking space. With this, the banks are now enabled to provide customers with a secure means of accessing digital assets in compliance with federal regulations.

The OCC stressed that institutions need to continue having robust risk controls, such as cybersecurity controls and compliance programs. Hence, all their operations can be safe and in line with current rules.

How Institutions Might Respond To OCC’s Crypto Guidance 

The decision generated multiple responses from industry analysts. According to one of them who identifies as VanQish, the decision is a big change for banks to venture into digital assets markets.

VanQish stated that this explanation would make it easier for institutions to provide a pathway for crypto transactions. This move follows an earlier shift when the OCC opened industry entry to crypto bank Erebor, backed by billionaire Peter Thiel.

Another point raised by VanQish is that the OCC considers crypto brokerage as equal to the well-established banking operations. He also stated that the description of the settlement risk in the letter is similar to derivatives and forex.

Source: https://coingape.com/occ-confirms-banks-can-facilitate-no-risk-crypto-transactions/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

The post “I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “I am NOT building a new financial system. I built a casino.”This stark admission from Ken Chan, former co-founder of derivatives protocol Aevo, has been reverberating across Asian crypto communities this week. What began as a post on X has now crossed linguistic borders, been introduced to Chinese communities by local news media, and been widely shared among Korean traders, accumulating millions of views along the way. Sponsored Sponsored From Ayn Rand to Disillusionment: A Libertarian’s Journey Through Crypto Chan’s confession is not merely a critique—it is the unraveling of a personal ideology. He describes himself as a “starry-eyed libertarian” who donated to Gary Johnson’s 2016 presidential campaign after being radicalized by Ayn Rand’s novels. The cypherpunk ethos of Bitcoin spoke directly to this worldview. “Being able to walk across the border with a billion dollars in your head is and always will be a powerful idea to me,” he writes. Yet eight years of industry experience eroded that idealism. Chan recounts how the Layer 1 wars—the flood of capital into Aptos, Sui, Sei, ICP, and countless others—produced no meaningful progress toward a new financial system. Instead, it “literally torched everyone’s money” in pursuit of becoming the next Solana. His verdict is unsparing: “We do not need to build the Casino on Mars.” According to his LinkedIn profile, Chan departed Aevo in May this year. His personal website indicates he is now working on KENSAT, a personal satellite project. It is scheduled to launch aboard a Falcon 9 in June 2026. His confession arrives six months after his departure. It comes as AEVO token trades at roughly $45 million in fully diluted market cap—down approximately 99% from its peak. Chan’s central metaphor—that crypto has become “the biggest, online, multi-player 24/7 casino our generation has ever concocted”—cuts through technical complexity with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 11:04
Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

The post Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has warned that Bitcoin developers must prepare for a potential quantum computing breakthrough that could render the network’s current security measures outdated. Summary At the All-In Summit, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko reignited debate over Bitcoin’s long-term security. There’s a “50/50” chance that quantum computers could break its cryptographic defenses within five years. Rapid advances in AI show how quickly theory can become reality. The question is not just if Bitcoin must migrate to quantum-safe cryptography—but when. According to Yakovenko, who was speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, there is a “50/50” probability that within five years, quantum computers will be strong enough to crack the cryptographic safeguards protecting Bitcoin wallets. The concern centers on quantum machines running algorithms like Shor’s, which could crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm currently protecting Bitcoin (BTC) private keys. This would allow attackers to forge transactions and compromise wallets, creating an existential risk for the network. Yakovenko argued that “we should migrate Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant signature scheme” before such technology becomes viable. Skeptics like Blockstream’s Adam Back downplay immediacy of threat The Bitcoin community remains divided on the urgency of quantum threats. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, estimated that the technology is still relatively far away and argued that making Bitcoin quantum-ready is “relatively simple.” Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd dismissed current quantum computers as non-existent, stating that “demos running toy problems do not count.” Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Core contributor, suggested quantum threats pose less immediate danger than spam transactions and developer corruption issues the community currently faces. Bitcoin’s design complicates any quantum upgrade. A migration to post-quantum cryptography would require a hard fork, a highly contentious and technically complex process needing widespread network support. Yakovenko countered skepticism by pointing to quick AI advances as evidence of how…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 01:33